Preview

Scientific Method and Sir Karl Popper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scientific Method and Sir Karl Popper
Sir Karl Popper, challenging the status quo, inspiring generations to ponder on the meaning of science, the methods to find truth, is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. Of particular importance to scientific methods of inquiry is the brawl between the development of theory and the criteria for science. In Popper’s own words, it is in this brawl that Popper decided to “grapple with the problem: When should a theory be ranked as scientific? or Is there a criterion for the scientific character or status of a theory?” (Popper 1957), p. 1).
Born just after the turn of the century in 1902 (my Great Aunt was 4 at the time), in London, England, Popper began grappling with the brawl between “when is theory scientific” and “what is the criteria for the scientific character of theory” in the fall of 1919 (p. #). The thing that troubled Popper most he stated is “When is theory true?” (Popper 1957), p. 1-2). Born from the thing that was troubling Popper most originated his philosophy of Science as Falsification. First, it may be dangerous to proceed any further in this discussion without bringing into light perspectives about the time when Popper toiled on the naissance of falsification.
In 1919, when Popper began to labor about potential for truth in theory, social turbulence was epidemic in Europe. The period between 1914 and 1989 can be viewed as a “protracted European Civil war” (Williams 2005). World War I (WWI) is well underway while communism extends beyond German idealists and the Russian Comintern into Hungary and Italy. Greek forces occupy Turkey’s Aegean coast for territorial ambitions. Over 20 million people are dying of a flu epidemic sweeping across China, Europe, and into the Americas. Social principles shift in the United States with laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol and granting women the right to vote. Social disturbance, disorder is the standard, not the exception of the time when Popper inaugurates a quest to find ‘truth’



References: Aiken, Henry David (1947), "Review: [Untitled]," The Journal of Philosophy, 44 (17), 459-73. Klemke, E.D., R. Hollinger, D. Rudge, A. (Eds) Klein, and A. (David) Klein (1998), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science: Prometheus Books. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Lakatos, I. (1963), "Proofs and Refutations (2, 3, 4)," The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14 (54), 120-39. Popper, K. R. (1952), "The Nature of Philosophical Problems and Their Roots in Science," The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3 (10), 124-56. Popper, Karl (1957), "Science as Falsification," ed. Cambridge University Peterhouse, London: Mayfield Publishing Company. Williams, Hywel (2005), "Cassell 's Chronology of World History," in Cassell 's Chronology of World History, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 767.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alan Chalmers, a British-Australian philosopher of science and best-selling author, suggests a common view of science by which scientific knowledge is ‘reliable’ and ‘objectively proven’ knowledge that is derived from facts of experience, experimental procedure and observations. This essay aims to discuss the problems that are likely to be highlighted by a Popperian hypothetico-deductivist when confronted with Chalmers’ adverse views on the validity of the scientific method. Both Alan Chalmers and Karl Popper - renowned for the development of hypothetico-deductivist/falsificationist account of science - represent the two major, contradictory theories (falsification and induction) regarding the functionality of science. I will be structuring my argument around these two models and the several complications surrounding the inductivist’s account of science that are seemingly solved by Popper’s alternative.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hummanities 3991

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When we talk about science, many people hear the term “theory”. The definition of a scientific theory can become confusing since many people interpret the meaning differently. When a person uses the term “theory” in a sentence it is usually used in a non-scientific way. They assume that a theory is something assumed, but not proven. When the term “theory” is used in science, it means an explanation based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. It has been tested and confirmed as a general principle to explain phenomena. A scientific theory must be based on careful examination of facts. “A theory is a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has stood the test and (so far, at least) has not been contradicted by evidence” (Suplee 9).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A: The book states that in order for something to be considered scientific there must be some test or possible observation that could disprove it, if there is not a way to disprove it, and then it cannot be supported by science.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keywords Study Guide

    • 2531 Words
    • 11 Pages

    c) Poppers answer to the demarcation problem. A way to solve demarcation problem to determine science from Pseudoscience. Pseudoscience wants to…

    • 2531 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hanson N.R. (1958) Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.…

    • 3031 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hunter, Cornelius, Science’s Blind Spot: The Unseen Religion of Scientific Naturalism, Ada, MI: Brazos Press, 2007.…

    • 2863 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most people wouldn’t question that science has benefited humanity; from better health and medicine to the luxuries of technology. However, as a society we demand certainty in our scientific advances. We want to know we can treat disease without causing other illnesses, design car safety that is reliable or a computer that does not develop intelligence and take over the world. But how do scientists define this certainty? In this paper we will explore Popper’s premise for using falsificationism as the demarcation methodology for science. This will be accomplished by examining both why inductionism and verificationism are inferior methodologies and why falsificationism is superior in claiming certainty. Next I will examine Hemple’s “background assumptions” objection to falsificationism, Finally, I will debate that falsificationism will ultimately hold ground over the Hemple’s objection.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's 3 Worldviews

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Worldviews are viewed to be composed of core and peripheral beliefs. Critically assess the implications of changes in such core and peripheral beliefs (Aristotelian, Newtonian, Einsteinian), for our understanding of scientific inquiry, particularly in light of Karl Popper’s theory of falsification. Over the course of history the world has developed and taken many paths to reach where we are today. Collectively, we all influence the direction of our society, morals, views and more significantly, our belief system.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Reckoning Anew

    • 7315 Words
    • 30 Pages

    What I present here is entirely about developing a proper foundation of knowledge as to become well-learned in philosophy and its implications found within the fields of Physics, Biology, and Anthropology. Describing this proposal is accomplished by tracing through my various influences as it pertains to each subject mentioned, including: Thomas Hobbes, Stanley Salthe, Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Roland Omnès, and Jared Diamond. Prospective Curriculum Spring 2013 Epistemology: Theory of Knowledge (PHIL 3410) MW 9:05-10:45 (Brooklyn College) Classical and contemporary theories of the nature of knowledge and belief.…

    • 7315 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific revolutionaries attempted to extricate themselves from their intellectual heritage and explain man, the natural world, and the laws that governed it using calculations and experimentation, instead of just conjecture and thought. Brilliant men such as Nicholas Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, and Isaac Newton all played uniquely important roles in shaping the course of history and impacting modern science by laying its foundation centuries ago (Kreis, “Lecture…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stumpf, S.E. & Abel, D.C. 2002. Elements of Philosophy an introduction, Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw- Hill.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Scientific Revolution is the term used to describe the emergence of modern science that took place throughout the 16th to 17th centuries. There is no exact set of dates for the Scientific Revolution, but it peaked between the 16th to 17th centuries. Despite bitter opposition from both Catholic and Protestant religious authorities, the views of the astronomers and scientists didn’t change. Leading figures of the Scientific Revolution included Isaac Newton, Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, and many others.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay aims to evaluate the paradigm shift of the scientific development by contrast the “normal science”. Firstly, explain the definition and evaluate the characteristics of the Kuhn’s theory by analyses the claims of the questions. Secondly, compare the normal science and other counter-theory form the opponents by relating the problems of reality which is about the contemporary scientific development. Thirdly, to argue the barrier of paradigm which is could obstruct Kuhn’s theory developing. Lastly, to summarise the contribution of paradigm to the development of the scientific philosophy. The real magnitude of Kuhn’s theory, however, is not about the influence of his definitions but in the evidence that he independently alter the way which entertain the humans’ most organized attempt to comprehend the world. Before Kuhn, people were used to using the philosophical ideas to think about the scientific method while with a valiant romance of advances in science. On the other words, before Kuhn, there are huge knowledge about the Whig Interpretation of History of scientific history, in the past studies, theoreticians and experimenters were in long march, if not for the “truth”, then at least for the border and deeper understanding of the real world (Naughton, 2012).…

    • 1834 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stewart, D., Blocker, G. H., & Petrik, J. (2012). Fundamentals of philosophy. (8th ed. ed.). New…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays