Scientific Method and Sir Karl Popper

Topics: Scientific method, Falsifiability, Science Pages: 4 (1407 words) Published: November 28, 2009
Sir Karl Popper, challenging the status quo, inspiring generations to ponder on the meaning of science, the methods to find truth, is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. Of particular importance to scientific methods of inquiry is the brawl between the development of theory and the criteria for science. In Popper’s own words, it is in this brawl that Popper decided to “grapple with the problem: When should a theory be ranked as scientific? or Is there a criterion for the scientific character or status of a theory?” (Popper 1957), p. 1). Born just after the turn of the century in 1902 (my Great Aunt was 4 at the time), in London, England, Popper began grappling with the brawl between “when is theory scientific” and “what is the criteria for the scientific character of theory” in the fall of 1919 (p. #). The thing that troubled Popper most he stated is “When is theory true?” (Popper 1957), p. 1-2). Born from the thing that was troubling Popper most originated his philosophy of Science as Falsification. First, it may be dangerous to proceed any further in this discussion without bringing into light perspectives about the time when Popper toiled on the naissance of falsification. In 1919, when Popper began to labor about potential for truth in theory, social turbulence was epidemic in Europe. The period between 1914 and 1989 can be viewed as a “protracted European Civil war” (Williams 2005). World War I (WWI) is well underway while communism extends beyond German idealists and the Russian Comintern into Hungary and Italy. Greek forces occupy Turkey’s Aegean coast for territorial ambitions. Over 20 million people are dying of a flu epidemic sweeping across China, Europe, and into the Americas. Social principles shift in the United States with laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol and granting women the right to vote. Social disturbance, disorder is the standard, not the exception of the time when Popper inaugurates a quest to find ‘truth’...

References: Aiken, Henry David (1947), "Review: [Untitled]," The Journal of Philosophy, 44 (17), 459-73.
Klemke, E.D., R. Hollinger, D. Rudge, A. (Eds) Klein, and A. (David) Klein (1998), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science: Prometheus Books.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1963), "Proofs and Refutations (2, 3, 4)," The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14 (54), 120-39.
Popper, K. R. (1952), "The Nature of Philosophical Problems and Their Roots in Science," The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3 (10), 124-56.
Popper, Karl (1957), "Science as Falsification," ed. Cambridge University Peterhouse, London: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Williams, Hywel (2005), "Cassell 's Chronology of World History," in Cassell 's Chronology of World History, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 767.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Karl Popper Essay
  • Karl Popper Essay
  • What is science and a scientific theory according to Karl Popper? Essay
  • Essay on Philosophy of Science
  • The Scientific Method Research Paper
  • Scientific Method Essay
  • Scientific Method Research Paper
  • Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn 2 Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free