Science Against Religion

Topics: Evolution, Creationism, Theistic evolution Pages: 6 (2265 words) Published: February 25, 2013
Conflict: Science against Religion
Kimberly Abad
PHI 103
Prof. Taneshia Pugh
September 1, 2012

Conflict: Science against Religion
Throughout the ages science and religion have struggled with one another. They both are constantly striving to gain the upper hand against the other. Within this struggle both are trying to assert the fact that their ideas are accurate and how the others ideas are inaccurate. Science yearns to answer the questions of how things happen through the means of solid facts. Religion, on the other hand, seeks to answer the question of why things occur and its thought process is grounded in faith. Some believe that the two views are not in turmoil with one another. This thought process is extremely skewed because these two belief systems contradict one another consistently and believers of each view then struggle to prove their perspective is correct. Science and religion, “do not have the same viewpoints about the nature of the world or agree about how truth is perceived or confined” (Neese, 2001). These two ideologies are at war with one another. The issues between the two cannot be overlooked or brushed under the rug because there are too many opposing aspects. Because of this there is no way for these two ideologies to coexist harmoniously. When science and religion have overlapping topics that attempt to answer the same questions, conflict occurs between believers of each theory. A good example of this overlap is the Evolution theory. This theory has caused controversy from its beginnings in history. Evolution, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary, is “a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations” (Webster, 2012). The placement of this theory in high school text books has been very controversial. Multiple court cases have been fought over the theory of evolution and its existence within public schools’ curriculum. There are cases dating back from 1968 up until present day arguing about whether this theory should be taught to students (Masamura & Mead, 2001). According to religion, God made all things. This is known as creationism. Within the creationism theory there is no margin for compromise. God made man and there is no other explanation in accordance with the creationism theory. The Theory of Evolution contradicts everything that religion is based on. The Bible says that God created the animals but he also created man. The Bible speaks nothing of God creating animals and they evolving into mankind, so the idea that religious parties could agree with the evolutionary theory and accept it is ludicrous. Regardless of whether it is acknowledged or not, science is deeming what religion believes as a lie. There is no way to avoid the turmoil that it causes by attempting to prove that God didn’t make man but instead we evolved from animals. Debates regarding where mankind comes from seems to elevate tempers and leads to arguments. History shows us that people have not agreed upon these two opinions and it has led to judicial action because there could not be an agreement made about the subjects. These are not issues of the past but are still currently raging throughout society even today. It is absurd to think that the theory of creationism and the theory of evolution do not cross over into one another and create conflict. How could two views that are polar opposites possibly be agreed upon? It is a simple answer; they can and will not be agreed upon. Another argument that rages between science and religion is the argument about the approximate age of the Earth. Science believes that the Earth is billions of years old; meanwhile, religious groups believe that the Earth is approximately 10,000 years old. Scientists believe that the earth can be dated back over 4 billion years using a method of Argon-Argon dating (Robins,...

References: Abrams, M. (2007). BORN GAY?. Discover, 28: 58-83. Retrieved Friday, August 10, 2012 from
EBSCOhost database.
DIAS, P. (2010). Is Science Very Different from Religion? A Polanyian Perspective. Science &
Christian Belief, 22(1), 43-55
“Evolution”. (2012). In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved August 28, 2012, from http://www.
Fish, J. M. (2010). Science VS Religion DEBATE. Humanist,70(4), 27-31.
Fitzpatrick,L
Fossil and Radiosiotope Dating. (2011). Retrieved August 28, 2012, from http://creationscience
today.com/28-Carbon-14_Dating.html
Helden, A.V. (1995). The Galileo Project. Retrieved from http://galileo.rice.edu/bio/narrative
_7.html.
Masamura,M. , Mead, L. (2001). Ten Major Court Cases About Evolution and Creationism.
Retrieved from http://ncse.com/taking-action/ten-major-court-cases-evolution-
Neese, L. H. (2001). SCIENCE vs. RELIGION: The Challenge of Interpretation. USA Today
Magazine, 130(2674), 70
Robins, M. (2006). How We Know Earth’s Age. Discover, 27(3), 22-23. Retrieved Friday,
August 10, 2012 from EBSCOhost database.
Wade, N. (2011). Phonetic Clues Hint Language is Africa – Born. New York Times, Retrieved
from http://newyorktimes.com.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Science vs. Religion Essay
  • Science vs Religion Essay
  • Essay on Science and Religion: Two Separate Entities
  • Contemporary in Western Religion Essay
  • Essay about faith and religion
  • Essay on Life of Pi: the Correlation Between Science and Religion
  • Galileo on religion and science Essay
  • Science and Religion Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free