Preview

School Bully Vs. Country Dictator

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
School Bully Vs. Country Dictator
Gregory Heal
Ms. Cremin
AP English Language & Composition
16 February 2010
School Bully vs. Country Dictator There’s a thin line in what defines a bully and what defines a dictator. The same line is often crossed back and forth. By definition a bully is a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people and a dictator is a person who uses absolute, unrestricted control to rule over a group of inferior people. These two definitions are interchangeable between the two types of rulers. Both bullies and dictators are the supreme rules of the territory they’ve chosen to name theirs. They rely on and base their thoughts on Darwinist thoughts and systems of survival of the fittest.
…show more content…
Instead of being the alpha lion, a dictator is the saber tooth tiger. Just like the bully this dictator tends his pride to do as they are told in order to maintain control of his territory. The way to tell whether the person you’re looking at is a lion (bully) or saber tooth tiger (dictator) is that a dictator must be stronger. This is because he has so much more land than the bully. He has an entire country worth of land and also has a greater population in his territory compared to the bully’s school campus/minuet amount of people. The next difference that defines a dictator is that he needs more followers especially those that have more power than the average person in his country. This just ensures that he keeps the weak insecure and subservient, and the strong maintain on top of the power hierarchy. If the dictator’s followers decided to stop working and leave, dictator would cease to …show more content…
These deals with the reason that people choose to obey to them, which is fear. Why does a victim try to avoid the bully at all costs? Fear. It’s the fear of being attacked, robbed; even the simplest verbal abuse is enough motivation to obey and stay away from this tyrant. A person doesn’t rebel against a dictator is because “the last person that did vanished and was never seen or heard from again.” Unlike the school bully dictators have a tendency to take their rule and punishments a bit far and to the extremes. Instead of taking a kids lunch money when a kid looks at them a wrong way, a dictator will send him to the guillotine and put his head on the nation’s flag for all to see. Unless they’re part of these rulers’ personal inner circle of followers, they usually fear and despise them with a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of time, rulers are known as sovereigns who protect their empire as well as their people. They are required to sustain order, harmony as well as being content with their empire. Throughout history we have seen many leaders the good & the bad. Not all leaders were willing to listen to their people, as well as giving them what they want but some enforced their power and struck fear into their people. Rulers did many things throughout the course of history to show and acquire dominance across their empire, Louis XIV of France & Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are prime examples who used terror and manipulation to gain sovereignty of their empires.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the interwar period (1919-1939), many new authoritarian governments began to spring up and gain lots of popularity. For example, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Mussolini’s fascist Italy and Stalin’s communist Russia. People became dissatisfied with their democratic governments because their countries had lost recent wars and because their country’s economies were falling apart. They felt as if their government had failed them so they turned to new totalitarian governments. All three of these governments helped their countries “bounce back” economically and militarily so people were more willing to have their individual freedom’s taken away for the good of the state. This motivated authoritarian governments to take control and “redeem” their countries for past embarrassments.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An authoritarian leadership is when a leader tells you what they want you to do and you have to do it there and then without arguing. For example, in the Army when you are fighting on the front line and the sergeant tells you to get down you have to so that you don’t get shot.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As centuries pass and time continues to lapse, more and more countries are handing in their older systems of government for new ones such as democracy. Some countries, however, continue with the dictatorship model, even though logically, this system is as fallacious as it gets. In Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” and Orwell’s “Animal Farm”, there are plenty of superb examples of dictatorship leading to the downfall of entire communities. Brutus and Caesar from “Julius Caesar” and Napoleon from “Animal Farm” are three great examples of dictatorship causing problems.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This quote shows how the importance of dictatorial power in a “savage” society. Power is the most important thing when there are no boundaries to society.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The renowned Martin Luther King Jr know for being a social activist on the matter of equality of all races and ethnicities exclaims that, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people”. Through Martin Luther King Jr, one can presume that notion of oppression causes a society without tolerance and ethical diversity. Power is a quality desired by every human being, some people crave the notion of complete and utter dominance over any human being it is a sense of control that gives them a certainty of confront that no other desire can live up to it, the desire of power goes as far as committing atrocities such as murder, genocides and wars to gain absolute control over one…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Authoritarian leader makes quick, clear and precise independent decisions without any input. Even if there was, it wouldn’t affect the overall decision making as it needs to be decided quickly. The appropriate leader that would use the common traits of an authoritarian leader would be an officer in the army because usually they are loud and demanding.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However people maintain that checks and balances bend to slow the progression of governing thus preventing immediately necessary act from taking place. Though, that is the anticipated effect. Now to guard against bullying, human nature must be…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the documentary, a boy named Alex who had been bullied, said that “They [pushed him] so far that[he wanted] to become the bully ”(Bully). This shows that because Alex was exposed to this violent and cruel behavior so often, he almost wanted to become a bully as well. Dr. Tonja R. Nansel and colleagues at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development did a nationwide experiment which included “15,686 students in sixth through tenth grade in public and private schools”. They found out that children who bully and that children who are bullied are “more likely to engage in violent behaviors” rather than kids who have nothing to do with bullying. All their research has proved that “Bullies” “are not born, they are made”(Brody).When you go to school in the twenty first century, you don’t only get bullied at school, but at home too. This is because as long as you have a laptop or cellphone on you, the bullies can still reach you. This type of bullying is called cyber bullying. Cyberbullying is when you use cell phones, instant messaging, e-mail, chat rooms or social networking sites to harass, threaten or intimidate someone. This shows that bullying and war are definitely not nature, but nurture.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1984 Literary Analysis

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is it the common human nature to feel power over others? A totalitarian government seeks to utilize its message of confinement and authority to control the many aspects of life. In the novel 1984, Orwell portrays totalitarianism through psychological manipulation, physical control and the control of language.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A hated, thus unsuccessful ruler would be one that would not know his limits, and continue to use violence to obtain desired results. A wise ruler would be one who could look ahead and see when it is necessary to do harm so that he can know exactly what needs to be done, how to do it, and when to do it. Most importantly the ruler must have the ability to stop once what he has set out to do is accomplished. Violence and evil doing must be used sparingly to prevent the populous from hating…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    and were widespread in the fifth century. It is known as rule by one or that the ruling power is in the hands of an individual who has seized control, mainly by illegal means. A tyrant became known for holding onto power by cruel and abusive means. So, therefore tyranny was a response to corrupt governments that treated citizens harshly. A tyrant, who is usually a former soldier, would gain the support of the middle class by promising them a better life under his ruling. He would use the support he is getting to overthrow the government in power and seize power. They often kept their promises and did not make improvement to infrastructure while in power.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is it that brings all dictators together in comparison? Is it their ruthless actions towards others? Could it be their thirst for power? Or maybe it's the fact that all dictators use others to gain for themselves. "He [Napoleon] would only be too happy to let you make your decisions by yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where would we be?" (Orwell page 50). These examples prove Napoleon, ruler of Animal Farm, and Pol Pot, ruler of Cambodia, are indeed similar.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics