Preview

Sb1062 Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sb1062 Research Paper
You 're Name Here
English 90
4/2/2014
Are the people’s rights protected?
Ever since AZ SB1062 bill came into play, the media has taking a stand to cover everything from the pros and cons that similar bills like this will produce if it passes or does not pass. Many wonder why this bill has gotten too much national attention. AZ SB1062 was an Arizona bill designed to amend an existing law to give any individual or legal entity an exemption from any state law that limited or prohibited their freedom to practice their religion. If the law passed, it could mean that in the state of Arizona, individuals are essentially allowed to deny service to anyone for any reason including gays as long as they can justify that it is required by their religion to discriminate. Imagine a gay couple went to Walmart to buy a gallon of milk, the owner sees the gay couple and decides that they are not allowed to enter the store just because he or she is religious and according to his or her religion, he or she is not to serve the gay couple. If this, or similar bills like SB1062 do manage to pass, individuals or business owners would have every legal right to do that. However America is all about freedom, which is why I believe bills relating to SB1062 should not pass in order to protect individual’s right to
…show more content…
They believe that laws like this would allow discriminatory actions by businesses. For example, because In N Out is a religious based company, they can refuse to give services to anyone that claims they are gay if In N Out believes that is against their religion to serve them. Similar laws like this will also allow individuals to discriminate against whomever they want as long as they believe is required by their religion. This reasons stands because the constitution was created to protect people from discrimination on the basis of race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar to this case, Mr. Smith can argue that he is not discriminating against gays but he refuses to be involved with something that in his religion is considered “immoral and ungodly purpose.” He can also challenge California’s Unruh Act and call out the Fourteen Amendment because this law is forcing to abandon his freedom of religion. In the Fourteen Amendment, Section 1, states that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States…[and] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property”(US. Constitution, Amendment XIV, Sec 1). This means that California has no right to force him to follow a law that violates his liberty to enforce his practice of religion. Alike, Davis, for Mr. Smith, refusing to provide services to gay couples, is part of the practice of his religion. On the other hand, Adam and Steve would claim that Mr. Smith is using freedom of religion as an excused to discriminate against them because of their sexual orientation. As stated before, the Unruh Act states that all persons of the state of the California are free, equal, and cannot be denied access to business’ services because of sexual orientation, race,…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    That law often confused with Bill Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" administrative policy, clearly states that gays are not eligible to serve in uniform. The law enjoys widespread support, especially in the military, and federal courts have upheld it as constitutional several times. http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2009/06/29/allowing-gays-in-the-military-would-be-unfair-and-hurt-troop-morale…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a political atmosphere where homosexuality has become trendy, and those opposing it citing religious freedom are criticized, a debate has arisen between parties both for and against this exercise of religious freedom. Issues stem from the applications of personal religious freedom and their applications to business. This position has become increasingly difficult for courts to rule on, especially given the supreme court ruling on the legalization of same sex marriage which pushed this debate on religious freedom into the living room of America and out of court. The debate has captivated the interests of individuals in the US, even those without strong feelings for or against, given the conundrum that has arisen between the clash of religious freedom and personal expression. The question remains, should the views of an individual entitle them to discriminate when when conducting business with another, and in a union founded upon the separation between…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They wanted to appeal because they believed that the people’s rights were being infringed upon. The Supreme Court found that Connecticut law violated the “right to marital privacy” (McBride, 2007). The First Amendment has a penumbra where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). The Fourth and Fifth Amendments are described as protection against all governmental invasions "of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life” (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). Planned Parenthood asserted, “the state cannot dictate to husbands and wives what they may and may not do in their marital relations” (Stein, 2010, p. 100). The Supreme Courts stated that the state of Connecticut has to prove to the Courts that its law is "compelling" and "absolutely necessary" in order for the Supreme Court to overcome that right (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). Griswold was the a pro-marriage ruling and given the fact it was a case involving marriage and sex law, the decision strengthened the supremacy of heteronormative sexual expression (Stein, 2010, p. 29). The Oxford Dictionary defines heteronormative as Denoting or relating to a worldview that promotes heterosexuality as the normal or preferred sexual orientation (Oxford, 2015). With the Supreme Court ruling it provided married couples with privacy. The lawyer in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut mentioned, “Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives? The very idea is repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship” (Stein, 2010, p. 30). This helped set the groundwork for when other cases were brought up to the courts. Why is this court important to changing of urban sexualities in the 1960s? It is important because it provided women with the right to decide if they wanted to take contraceptive with worrying…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Instead people are outraged that it is interfering in their personal lives. It will not let them exercise there constitutional rights. Moreover they would be forced to obey or practice something that they don’t agree upon. People will not tolerate that there liberty and freedom will be in risk. Soon the similar types of entities like Hobby Lobby will be legitimizing discrimination against gays and lesbians by businesses (Salon.com, 2014). Defintly it would be unethical of doing so because what kind of an individual is having relationships is their personal right. In the name of faith and religion they will be creating barriers in there jobs and at work…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Threatening the First Amendment, private Catholic adoption and foster services in Boston, San Francisco, the District of Columbia, and the State of Illinois have been put out of business, “by revoking their licenses, by ending their government contracts, or both, because those charities refused to place children with same-sex couples or unmarried opposite-sex couples who cohabit.” (usccb). The government needs to protect the rights of private businesses to express their religious views. The First Amendment prohibits the from government to shuting down private businesses because of religious…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state in support of racism had laws that regulated where black people could live, work, and attend school. Racism and heterosexism also share the same practices such as marriage which many do not accept. So in that case the government is forced to regulate it. If marriage was normal between two straight people of the opposite gender and if it occurred naturally within racial categories there would be no need for laws against it. That is clearly not realistic nowadays so a senses of laws have been passed all designed to regulate marriage, An example of that would be how in the past the tax system has rewarded married couples with tax breaks that everyone else has been rejected to. With that being done, it was clearly a good idea to get married for your own financial reasons. Up until 1967 is when the state overturned these laws and created new ones to keep LGBT people from marrying stating “legal union between one man and one woman” (pg-237). Many might not agree with the governments decision about marriage and have petitioned against it. Marriage should be based on the love that one finds in another with no boundaries and the gender of the two should not be an issue. Over the years some states such as Conneticut and Massachusettes have actually legalized gay marrriage and the gay community couldn’t be anymore pleased. It is only a matter of time before the whole country allows gay…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    been cast as a civil liberties issue: homosexual persons seek constitutional rights and liberties that have…

    • 3601 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chick-Fil-A is well known for their stance on same-sex marriage. Dan Cathy, the president of Chick-Fil-A, has said that he “prays for God’s mercy” for a society that allows marriage equality (Stein). People may justify that just because Cathy says this doesn’t mean that is what Chick-Fil-A stands for, but Cathy has said that this view on marriage equality is what the company values (Morrison). People in the LGBTQ+ community have been discriminated against so heavily, and they fought for basic human rights for so long. Having huge companies like Chick-Fil-A come out and say that they are anti-marriage equality and justifying it by using the bible is toxic to the LGBTQ+ community and all they have fought for.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of our rights, as residents of the United States, is the freedom of choice. The freedom of choice allows us to make decisions for ourselves; it doesn’t let the government choose for us. We are allowed to choose the path of our lives. Who we marry, where we live, as well as who we become are all choices that we make…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The State of Indiana has been over ruled by Federal Courts on preventing gay marriage in the state (http://www.freedomtomarry.org/states/entry/c/indiana) pending another appeal by the state. The PDF of the article from the Wall Street Journal discussing about businesses that were refusing to cater to the business of gay marriage was the platform for this writing. I feel that I have proven the point that our world is continuously changing and like it or not people have to accept that change, as well as businesses. 50 years ago African-American people were not allowed in public places or allowed the same freedoms as whites. That is history now. Soon the banning of gay marriage and the boycott of such proceedings will be considered as…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asian American issue

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This lead to the ballet initiative 2 in 1998 in Hawaii. “Amendment to ban same sex marriage.” The yes vote was “no to gay marriage” and the no vote was “yes to gay marriage.” (Which made it a little confusing). A bunch of interest group played a big role in this. The movement to legalize same sex marriage failed in Hawaii because of how much the impacts of special interest groups. First off, JACL interest group voted no based on discrimination. The Japanese in Hawaii voted no as a block. Native Americans voted Yes on this ballet because they believed it would affect tourism and threaten sovereignty. The Gay/Lesbian voted no obviously base on their self interest discrimination. The Religious group voted yes on…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At a time where a procedural republic is present, gay marriage is an issue that does not satisfy the ideal of liberty as self-choosing and unencumbered. However, this concern has become one of the most controversial subjects today because it violates the first amendment, which is the right of the people to peaceably assemble. How are homosexuals supposed to assemble for their cause if they are threatened with violence? Homosexuality is the real problem in the eyes of many and anything relating to this topic is immediately cast down. Because homosexuals are a minority, their rights cannot be advocated because their lifestyle is not part of the dominant culture. The government is supposed to bracket morality issues and remain objective on topics like gay marriage, but for some reason this is not happening. Administrations are able to get away with using their religious and moral backgrounds to set certain laws in place, remaining unjust. The issue of gay marriage is not homosexuality in itself but an individual 's right to choose whom they want to marry.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Businesses should not be allowed to deny services, discriminate, due to sexuality or religious beliefs.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays