Preview

Savulescu And Momeyer's Conceptuality: Article Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Savulescu And Momeyer's Conceptuality: Article Analysis
Julian Savulescu and Richard W. Momeyer, wrote an article expressing their theories on informed consent being based on rational beliefs. The article constructed around Jehovah Witness beliefs causing its followers to reject blood transfusions, and how it is theoretically irrational. Both pressed the reason for irrational behavior due to the fear of violating biblical principles according to their interpretation of the scripture. Thus leading to Savulescu and Momeyer’s concussion, Jehovah Witnesses are not fully autonomous in their decision making, due to their belief system rooted in religion, rather than medical science. This suggests when patients act on their autonomy while regarding medical care, it must derive from rational beliefs as defined by commonly accepted medical practice, or it will be considered false …show more content…
I believe denying patient autonomy due to opposed opinion of the norm to be unjust, and to disregard the meaning of autonomy. Autonomy is defined as “self-government, free from control”, and does not stipulate it be constrained to only rational persons. While patient autonomy does require health care providers to inform patients, it does not mandate a patient use the information. If a patient denies health care, it is their right to do so, no matter the reason. By infringing on their rights, would be to deny patient autonomy entirely. Ultimately doctors may attempt to correct what they suppose as irrational, such as refusing a potentially lifesaving blood infusion, however they cannot ignore the patient’s final decision on the matter. Doctors are not infallible; they do make mistakes which is why Malpractice suits exist. Furthermore, medical treatments are not always straightforward and Doctors sometime disagree with the proper course of action. The ultimate choice must remain with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first legal issue in this case is patient consent. To perform any medical intervention or move ahead with a given treatment doctors need the authorization of the patient or his legal guardian. If doctors perform the treatment without this consent they could be charged for battery or negligence. In this case, Mr. Jones verbalized he do not want any intervention and that he wants his body intact then doctors cannot undertake the proposed treatment. However, Mr. Jones daughter disagrees.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hhi135 Unit 4 Assignment

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A patient has the right to physical privacy and the right to the Healthcare provider to maintain confidentiality of patient information. The patient’s right to physical privacy is the right to be left alone. If they are competent they have the right to say they do not want to be examined; however then the physician or medical facility has the right to tell the patient to leave if they do not want to be examined or treated. In addition weather the patient is competent or not medical staff needs to respect the patient’s right to privacy; by keeping the patient information confidential by not releasing information to press, family and friends who are not…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with your statement that we can cause harm as a result of not acknowledging autonomy. I think that assisting patients to a position of maximum autonomy involves providing them with unbiased information about their health status and pros/cons of their treatment regimen. According to Canther (2001), providing value-free information includes staff being ready to engage in debates that include awareness of the interpretation which their own values and beliefs unavoidably impose on the evidence (Canter, 2001). Furthermore, Brinchmann (2002), explains that nurses must be ready to work collaboratively with patients and within the multidisciplinary team to enable patients to express their own point of view, commensurate with their desired…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Dax's Case

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page

    I think that the respect of patient's autonomy in today's policy and values is sufficient enough. In Dax's case, there were less respect of patient's autonomy relative to today's world where people say "do what you do" is more common and more respected. I think that there will always be a clash between family members, doctors, and the patients themselves. I, a person who has an Asian background, probably had the typical problem with dying family, specifically my grandfather. My grandfather was in hospital for months and the hospital bill just keeps mounting. So, my grandfather decided to go home and just take the necessary medications until he died soon after he got out of the hospital. But, my grandmother and mother did not want him to go…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state's main goal is to preserve human life, regardless the opinion. In the case of Jehovah’s Witness cases, the state would take steps to override their religious belief, to better the chance of life. His statement is that whether a state can order a person to receive medical treatment when the family does not wish it, when it overrides evidence about the wishes of the patient, and the state has no justification besides their general interest in life. He also concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment protects the liberty of individuals, whether conscious or unconscious, from such invasion of the state.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An analysis of Robert Schwartz “Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine” reveals that physicians are not required to give patients treatment that has been proven to be effective, and they are not morally obligated to provide treatment that is not in-line with practice of medicine. Schwartz explains although our autonomy is respected, there are limitations on our request.…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Does the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment? Why or why not? Yes the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment because he has the choice to make the decision himself and on top of that he does not believe in modern day cancer treatments.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article present a case in which the patient and the family made a decision in favor of resuscitation that ran contrary to the physician’s medical judgement. The author argues that, where a patient request for treatment in conflict with physician’s responsibility to provide what he or she believes to be good medical care, a resort to autonomy alone is insufficient. The principal of autonomy, which allow patient to refuse any procedure or choose among different beneficial treatment, does not allow them to demand nonbeneficial and potentially harmful procedure. This is important because CPR should not be considered an alternative to be offered by physicians in such cases. Instead, the physician should have listened to the patient’s hopes and fears, reassured him that the physician should would continue to be there and provide appropriate therapy, and, if necessary, refer the patient to psychiatric personnel or clergy.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It should be noted that the core values pertaining to healthcare ethics require the healthcare staff to adhere to the four principles of autonomy, beneficence, justice and nonmaleficence. Autonomy or independence revolves around honoring the right of patients to make their decisions, whole nonmaleficence revolves around doing no harm. Beneficence underlines the requirement that the patient is assisted to advance his own good, while the principle of justice requires all patients to be treated in a similar and fair manner. In essence, it goes without saying that the healthcare institution was acting in violation of the same principles that it is supposed to adhere to in the provision of healthcare services to patients. Of course, it could be argued that the healthcare institution was operating within the established laws of the state and possibly the country at large. However, it should be noted that the key right of the patient and, in fact, every other citizen in the country is to ensure that no harm is caused to the patient and that the autonomy and independence of the citizen and patient to make decisions pertaining to his or her life is nonnegotiable. Indeed, scholars have…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As adults and human beings we have certain inalienable rights to make decisions regardless of whether they are deemed as poor or inappropriate by others. One must take into consideration the level of understanding and competence a patient possesses to assure they are informed of all options and repercussions; the other must be whether the individual is harming anyone other than themselves by making said decision. Once those issues have been taken into consideration there must be an allowance for an individual to make their own well-informed choice, even though as a practitioner, we may feel it is not in their best interest.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Autonomy is demonstrated in the ability I have to control my actions. Situations have arisen where I do not agree with a choice my patient has made. My first instinct would be…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion vs. Medical Care

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As Mrs. Johnson waits in the doctor’s office, she hopes to finally hear after two years of trying to conceive that she is expecting. A very successful twenty eight year old woman feels enthusiastic about her possibility of being pregnant, after four years of marriage. Dr. Neil enters the room and began to inform her that she has stage three ovarian cancer and he would like to start treatment as soon possible. Mrs. Johnson looks at the doctor and says,”No treatment, I know my faith in God will heal me.” Mrs. Johnson believes that God and her faith will heal her body, because it is a temple that God has made. The beliefs of different religions can lead to unnecessary pain, restricted care, and possible death.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should doctors be able to refuse demands for "futile" treatment? "Futile" treatment is when there is no medical benefit from the treatment they are receiving, and that there will be no improvement if they are in a permanent vegetative state. Although the concept of medical futility dates back in the Ancient Greek days with physician Hippocrates, it has only recently (in the past 40 years) become a controversial topic. The issue of medical futility is important because it deals with many issues such as patient-physician relationship, financial resources, and most importantly it deals with lives of people. The issues are controversial because it has alarmed many people that physicians may be taking it a step too far being able to pull the plug on a person with an incapacitating condition. The debate is over who has the right to make this decision - the patient 's family or physician. There are two sides to this debate; the "Yes" side says that the physician is more qualified and is following what the patient 's want to receive while the "No" side says that it should not be up to the physician to decide if the life is worth keeping or not.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Greynolds v. Kurman case, I agree with the court’s decision. “There was sufficient evidence to support a finding of lack of informed consent” (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 339). When I read the case it seemed like the physicians did not put any effort in explaining the complete picture, including the Greynolds options, and letting them decide what they wanted. By law, “when there is doubt as to a patient’s capacity to consent, the consent of the legal guardian or next of kin should be obtained” (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 337). Mrs. Greynolds was readily available to sign consent if that is what she decided to do. “There are a variety of consent forms designed to more specifically describe the risks, benefits, and alternatives of…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays