Preview

Sartre's Argument Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
107 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sartre's Argument Analysis
Many philosophers have their own unique viewpoints on the subject at hand. Jean-Paul Sartre, a French philosopher, suggests that we, as human beings, experience ourselves as free, so believing in determinism is, at most, an effort to avoid responsibility for ourselves. American philosopher, Harry Frankfurt, proposes that the primary differential feature between human beings and animals is our capability to consider our ambitions and opinions, and form desires and judgments regarding them. Finally, David Hume, a Scottish philosopher, is recognized for offering the utmost leading statement for the compatibilist position of the free will debate. He states that freedom and moral responsibility can be reconciled with determinism.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jean Paul Sartre No Exit Analysis
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jean Paul Sartre No Exit Analysis

    The Rationale of this task was to create a dramedy of three stereotypes created in society to bump heads in one another, as based off of Jean-Paul Sartre’s No Exit. Three characters, President Bill Clinton, Marilyn Monroe, and Dana were selected to all fit into one enclosed space, an Art-Deco themed elevator, as a different representation for Hell. For this instance, the characters were all representations of stereotypes the 20th and 21st century had developed, in hopes that each opposite would create an interesting dynamic. Bill Clinton was selected to provide the face of the stereotypical perverted-politician. His language of modern patronization towards the two other females with sexual lingo, and simple southern vocabulary created his…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. Carnegie's Argument Analysis
    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mr. Carnegie's Argument Analysis

    Carnegie has inspired women and men to use their funds to their communities. Although he advised other wealthy to use their money to benefit the communities and help in the preservation of the political system and America economy. I believe Mr. Carnegie’s argument is persuasive and is still relevant today. The wealthy, as well as small business owners, are the job creators in our society today. Their vision and leadership help to support the lower class in earning a decent living while allowing them to realize their own potential. The lower class today has more opportunities that were not available to them generations ago. While government is there to provide a safety net for those less fortunate, it is the wealthy and job creators that…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Tierney Do You Have Free Will Summary
    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Tierney Do You Have Free Will Summary

    a controversy between whether or not a person has free will. He states that a determinist,…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard's Argument Analysis
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Beard's Argument Analysis

    For decades, historians have debated the purpose of the United States Constitution. Some, such as Charles Beard claim that the constitution is an economic document meant to secure power in the hands of the wealthy. Others, most notably Henry Commager have challenged Beard’s analysis and claim that the Constitution was drafted with political motives instead. To make his point, Beard primarily discusses the writers of the constitution, and only assumes what the document itself will say. Commager makes a more convincing argument since he uses both the Constitution itself and the framers’ words as evidence.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Necessity In David Hume's Definition Of Determinism
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Necessity In David Hume's Definition Of Determinism

    Determinism is defined as “the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. ”, there have been many cases where philosophers determine that determinism implies that beings that have no free will, cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. David Hume’s definition of necessity is similar to the definition of determinism because it shows that what is necessity is constant or always necessary, plainly put his definition states that necessity is the “constant conjunction of objects and the inference of the mind from one object to the other“ William James thought was that his will was free so he was considered a indeterminism. James believed that each being held moral responsibility…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tim Wise's Argument Analysis
    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tim Wise's Argument Analysis

    Tim Wise had a different childhood than most, he was raised by the phrase "Race matters." As a pre-schooler he was sent to a mostly black school and learned to respect black authority figures. This resulted in him being more racially aware while growing up. His main argument was that racial inequality still exists today. As he went through college, he became very involved in a group that advocated for better rights for people in Africa. Several weeks later, he was asked what he had done to address racism in his own city, New Orleans. He then realized he hadn't done anything in his own town. He began working for the next twenty years to advocate for racial equality still exists. The argument is made that white people are blind to their advantages and privileges. According to Wise, white privileges is built into our system and has helped us without us knowing. White people in the US have had many more privileges compared to people of color, it's just built into the foundation of our…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Critically Examine the Claim That Free Will and Determinism Are Incompatible
    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Critically Examine the Claim That Free Will and Determinism Are Incompatible

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Chisholm And Compatibilism Essay
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chisholm And Compatibilism Essay

    Harry Frankfurt (living philosopher) is a compatibilist who trusts that both freedom and determinism are…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roderick Chisholm on Freedom of the Will
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roderick Chisholm on Freedom of the Will

    There is much debate over the issue of whether we have complete freedom of the will or if our will caused by something other than our own choosing. There are three positions adopted by philosophers regarding this dispute: determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Determinists believe that freedom of the will does not exist. Since actions are events that have some predetermined cause, no actions can be chosen and thus there is no will to choose. The compatibilist argues that you can have both freedom of the will and determinism. If the causes which led to our actions were different, then we could have acted in another way which is compatible with freedom of the will. Libertarians believe that freedom of the will does exist.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's Argument Analysis
    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nietzsche's Argument Analysis

    Nietzsche argues that we can never know reality because our intellect is only a tool for survival. Intellect, he says, is “given only as an aid to the most unfortunate, most delicate, most evanescent beings in order to hold them for a minute in existence” (Reader, 1). The main use of intellect is to create stimulations of reality, which we are “acting a role before others and before oneself” (Reader 2). With respect to understanding our world, Nietzsche acknowledges the role that senses play in forming concepts. Sensory informations leads to words that in turn organize and describe a concept. He introduces the origin of a concept as we “equate what is unequal”(Reader 5). Information from different experiences are all categorized into one “arbitrary…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Jean Paul Sartre Use Metaphor In No Exit
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Jean Paul Sartre Use Metaphor In No Exit

    With the thought of Hell comes the spine-chilling red devil with instruments of torture, shrill screams of pain, and an encompassing, sweltering heat. Jean Paul Sartre proves in his play, No Exit, that Hell is not this petrifying scenario that is so popularized, but that Hell is simply other people. He uses metaphors to prove that the characters lose their sense of selves in hell, and have no other way to look at themselves except through the other people present.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bartholomae Argument Analysis
    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bartholomae Argument Analysis

    At first read of this article, I realize how important this essay is for understanding the complexities of how many students must negotiate when writing for the first time. Not only in an academic community in general – but also in the different departments of the academic community such as; English, Philosophy, Biology, Psychology, etc.. After my second read of this article, I realize that Bartholomae’s audience is for teachers, in that, Bartholomae raises awareness for a need among composition and writing scholars to be very specific in the demands they make on students. However, even though many students are very much aware of the demands of the academic community, many are still lacking the power to live up to the expectation and engage,…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unger And Descartes Argument Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unger And Descartes Argument Analysis

    There are always two sides of the same coin, and the coin is the subject of existence. To go against Unger’s, I Do Not Exist, I will use Descartes view of dualism and the fact that, according to him, humans do exist. Yes, there are other views of existence that could go against both of these philosophical views, but Unger and Descartes really counterbalance each other. As mentioned before, Unger explains he doesn’t exist due to anything which exists having a finite amount of small parts. If these parts were continually taken away, one could exist until at one point it would not, due to losing all their parts. In respect to Unger, his argument is correct when dealing with objects such as “tables or chairs, rocks or stones or ordinary stars,”…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis Of Gary Gutting's Article: What Makes Free Will Free
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Analysis Of Gary Gutting's Article: What Makes Free Will Free

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary and Critique of Argument
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary and Critique of Argument

    In “if you assign my book don’t censor it’’ published in Kernersville, N.C on November 28, 1999, Mark Mathabane argues the high school that assign his novel ‘’Kaffir Boy’’ should not censor chunks of his book that contributes to the meaning of the novel. This novel is about Mathabanes childhood, living in Africa during the during the apartheid period. There is mature scene and language in this novel that parents would disagree with, but all with reason and purpose. He argues that those parts censored teach lessons, not to take everyday things like food or freedom for granted, to utilize education as a tool to make our society better, and to always to have the urge make the right choices in life. Mathabane uses all three logos, pathos and ethos to support his claim; he also uses his personal experiences to contribute to his argument to not censor parts in his novel that serve a great importance and lesson.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More