Preview

Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Presented by:
Ibrahim M. Conteh; Ruby Proctor Garcia; Kathleen M. Parry;
Joseph M. Schmerling; Jaime Ulloa
Auditing Theory and Practice
0902 ACCT422 4021
Due: April 29, 2009
Table of Contents
Page Number
What is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002? 3
Why was SOX established? 4
When did SOX take effect? 5
What companies were affected and how? 6
What does SOX compliance require? 9
Conclusion 11
References 13
What is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002?
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – its official name being “Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002” – is recognized to be the most significant U.S. federal disclosure and corporate governance legislation since the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), and, the provisions of the Act are significant enough that it is considered by many to be the most significant change to federal securities laws in the U.S. since the New Deal.
It is best understood, however, not as a piece of legislation centered on a new concept of regulation, but as a process which mandated that many major reforms be implemented as soon as possible (in some cases, within 30 days) on the precise schedule specified by Congress. In that sense, the Enron and WorldCom debacles provided the impetus of public outrage that forced into effect some of the most readily available reform proposals for publicly traded companies, many of which had existed for years without sufficient political imperative to be enacted.[1]
The Act provides for new levels of auditor independence; personal accountability for CEOs and CFOs; additional accountability for corporate Boards; increased criminal and civil penalties for securities violations; increased disclosure regarding executive compensation, insider trading and financial statements; and certification of internal audit work by external auditors.[2]
Why was



References: CIO magazine. “SEC/Sarbanes Oxley Changes to Give Small Public Firms a Break.” December 11, 2006. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.cio.com/. Kochems, Alane. “Who’s on First? A Strategy for Protection Critical Infrastructure. May 5, 2005. Accessed April 9, 2009 from: The Hertiage Foundation website at http://www.heritage.org/research/homelandsecurity/bg1851.cfm. The Institute of Internal Auditors. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Effect on Audit Committees at Publicly Traded Companies.” January 2004. Assessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.theiia.org/. The Institute of Internal Auditors. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Effect on Audit Committees at Organizations Not Publicly Traded.” January 2004. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.itaudit.org/. The National Council of Nonprofit Organizations. “Learning from Sarbanes-Oxley: A Checklist for Nonprofits and Foundations”. June 2004. Assessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.councilofnonprofits.org/. PCAOB. “Auditing Standard No. 3 – Audit Documentation.” June 9, 2004. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.pcaobus.org/. PCAOB. “Conforming Amendments to PCAOB Auditing Standards: Amendment to Auditing Standard No. 3 resulting from Auditing Standard No. 5.” August 25, 2004. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.pcaobus.org/. The U.S. General Accounting Office. “Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Consideration of Key Principles Needed in Addressing Implementation for Smaller Public Companies.” GAO-06-361, April 13, 2006. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.gao.gov/. Wright, George W. “Postal Service readies for Sarbanes-Oxley Act.” February 4, 2008. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=3348921. [2] The Institute of Internal Auditors. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Effect on Audit Committees at Organizations Not Publicly Traded.” January 2004. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.itaudit.org/ [3] CIO magazine [4] The Institute of Internal Auditors. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Effect on Audit Committees at Organizations Not Publicly Traded.” January 2004. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.itaudit.org/ [5] The Institute of Internal Auditors [6] The National Council of Nonprofit Organizations. “Learning from Sarbanes-Oxley: A Checklist for Nonprofits and Foundations”. June 2004. Assessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.councilofnonprofits.org/ [7] Wright, George W. “Postal Service readies for Sarbanes-Oxley Act.” February 4, 2008. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=3348921. [8] Kochems, Alane. “Who’s on First? A Strategy for Protection Critical Infrastructure. May 5, 2005. Accessed April 9, 2009 from: The Hertiage Foundation website at http://www.heritage.org/research/homelandsecurity/bg1851.cfm [9] PCAOB [10] Kochems, Alane. “Who’s on First? A Strategy for Protection Critical Infrastructure. May 5, 2005. Accessed April 9, 2009 from: The Hertiage Foundation website at http://www.heritage.org/research/homelandsecurity/bg1851.cfm. [11] The U.S. General Accounting Office. “Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Consideration of Key Principles Needed in Addressing Implementation for Smaller Public Companies.” GAO-06-361, April 13, 2006. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.gao.gov/. [12] CIO magazine. “SEC/Sarbanes Oxley Changes to Give Small Public Firms a Break.” December 11, 2006. Accessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.cio.com/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ACC 290 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) originated on July 29, 2002 due to fraudulent bookkeeping practices and misleading financial reports from large corporations. These practices created a number of accounting scandals, which resulted in this in the government creating such an act. The purpose was to prevent and punish corporate corruption and, along the way, try to repair investor confidence. The law was passed by congress after well-known companies (Enron, Peregrine Systems and Tyco International, to name a few) caused great humiliations to its investors, which in result cost them billions of dollars. The share prices of the affected companies collapsed, which shook public confidence in the nation’s securities markets.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress responded by enacting the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), which became effective on July 30, 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley makes many changes in the securities regulation process to improve corporate governance and reporting. It imposes harsh penalties on violators, creates an elaborate system for governing and regulating auditors for public companies, and requires the securities industry’s self-regulatory organizations to adopt rules to prevent conflicts of interest and enhance the independence of securities analysts. Even casual observers of the political reaction to the stunning disclosures about Enron, WorldCom and Tyco’s deceitful financial practices might have predicted some such legislative response (Jennings, 2010, p. 212).…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Executive Summary: Financial reporting has been dissected over and over again by legislation. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hold the key to providing protection and integrity when companies are submitting their financial statements. Although their mission is to provide order and efficiency for financial markets, insidious plans are still developed by companies which ultimately result in turmoil to the economy. To provide a safeguard to investors, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed by congress in 2002, which was constructed because of fraudulent acts of well-known companies such as Enron. Before the SOX was inaugurated, two sets of accounting rules were used as guides for CPA firms.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Prepared For Up and Coming Accountants Prepared By February 16, 2008…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 4123 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Ibrahim 3 Introduction The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, is a federal law enacted in response to corporate and accounting scandals that led to bankruptcies and severe stock losses. Corrupt corporations, particularly Enron, WorldCom and Tyco, were acting unethical by committing accounting errors and fraudulent practices by management which led to scandals in 2001. The scandals impacted investors, who lost billions of dollars when the stock prices plummeted, and the public lost confidence in the capital markets. The main supporters of the law are Representative Michael Oxley and Senator Paul Sarbanes, both who combined their respective law to form the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The goal was to improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. The law was quickly passed to correct the corporate scandals involving companies such as Tyco, WorldCom…

    • 4123 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: • Six Years of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Are We Better Off? By Dodwell, William J: The CPA Journal, August 1 2008…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mr Zhang

    • 42353 Words
    • 170 Pages

    Fraud questions are now specifically identified with a fraud triangle The introduction of Sarbanes-Oxley issues has been accomplished in two ways. First, case content has been altered to include Lakeside’s consideration of financing expansion through an initial public offering, and the resulting impact such a decision would have on Lakeside and on Abernathy and Chapman, CPAs. Second, the discussion questions and exercises have been expanded to include consideration of Sarbanes-Oxley and new auditing and independence standards, both by adding a section in the end-of-chapter material and by reference in the other questions where appropriate. The following list includes all the questions with the location of the question and a brief learning objective.…

    • 42353 Words
    • 170 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Frank ACC291 Accounting II September 26, 2012 Gary Connelly…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002, after accounting fraud at Enron and WorldCom, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley to establish a system of federal oversight of corporate accounting practices in response to corporate accounting scandals, and restore stakeholders’ confidence. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that corporations take “greater responsibility for their decisions and to provide leadership based on ethical principles”. For instance, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act makes the CEOs and CFOs personally liable for the credibility and accuracy of their companies’ financial statements.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). "Our Mission."http://www.pcaobus.org/PCAOB. "PCAOD Issues Guidance on Audits of Internal Control."http://www.pcaobus.org/News_and_Events/News/2005/05-16.asp. May 16, 2005.…

    • 4791 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act Research Project Brielle Lewis MBA 315 March 6, 2014 I. Abstract The purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities law, and for other purposes. (Lander, 2004) The Act created new standards for public companies and accounting firms to abide by. After multiple business failures due to fraudulent activities and embezzlement at companies such as Enron Sarbanes and Oxley recognized a need for the revamping of our financial systems laws, rules and regulations. Thus, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was born.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 340 Week 5 Individual Assignment Sarbanes Oxley Act Article Analysis • Use the Electronic Reserve Readings, the University Library, the Internet, or other credible resources to locate an article that examines the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.• Write a 700- to 1,050-word summary of this article addressing the following:…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Scenario

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: “The Sarbanes Oxley Act” (2002), William J. Carney, (2004), Engles, Hayes and Wang,(2005) The Sarbanes Oxley Act and Firms going private, Qian, Strahan, and Zhu, (2009), UOP, (University of Phoenix) , Public Law, 107-204…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sox Article

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Small and Large Firms Regulatory Costs: The Case of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act By James A. Millar and B. Wade Bowen…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Auditing Special Assignment

    • 3054 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Theresa Golding BA 418 – Auditing Dr. Charles Pineno April 25, 2010 PART 1: “Small Firms May Face Audit Music” (published in The Wall Street Journal on April 19, 2007) addresses the ending of the delay in applying portions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to smaller companies. At the time of the article, some 6,000 smaller public companies had yet to be required to “make an annual assessment of their internal financial-reporting controls with further review by the company’s outside auditor of these systems designed to help prevent accounting mistakes and fraud.” The delay arose from complaints that compliance was overly costly and time consuming for larger companies. According to Mr. Cox, the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) are close to making less burdensome for all companies which would end the need to further exempt the smaller companies. The proposed changes would make realization of compliance in 2008 possible. Delays could again result if the new standards are not issued soon enough to meet the current deadlines. The chairman of PCAOB, Mark Olson, has blamed the high cost of complying on what is viewed as an overly cautious approach. PCAOB reports that progress is being made but there is still a way to go as some auditing firms still have not fully integrated an audit of the company’s financial statements with an audit of the company’s internal controls which are interrelated.…

    • 3054 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays