Preview

Same Sex Marriage

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Same Sex Marriage
Same-Sex Marriage Are We All Equal
Same sex marriage is bad for society according to Jocelyn Floyd whose a special counsel for the Thomas More Society. In her article, Jocelyn talks about the definition of marriage, why the government shouldn’t be involved and how children will get emotionally hurt.
First and foremost, Floyd claims that “without children, we have no future”. In order to have children, a couple consisting of two opposite sex individuals should have sexual intercourse. Same sex couples cannot create children and therefore, will end the future sooner.
Floyd questions, “why is the government involved in marriage?”. Think about it, the government doesn’t recognize anybody’s love for their best friend according to Floyd. But, after Illinois got sued by a small group of people for discriminating on the basis of one’s sexual orientation and ability to get married by law in the state of Illinois, per Floyd Judge Hall had to redefine the meaning of marriage in the Illinois marriage law.
Floyd tells us that we should “focus on protecting children and ensuring their right to be raised by their mother and their father”. Is difficult to play the role of a mother and father and single parents have proven that. Same sex marriage will cause children to lose out on the mother/father parent love. That is why Floyd has suggested for “Illinois to focus on protecting and strengthening it, not undermining”
I say Smith has made good points when explaining his point of view towards same sex couples living together, what they are known for, and why is okay as long as marriage doesn’t get redefine.
First premise in the argument with which I agree, “I have no problem with same sex couples living together”.
Second premise in the argument with which I agree, “We normally call them good friends or roommates”.
Third premise in the argument with which I agree, “ If you want to equalize estate planning or medical benefits for same sex couples, then change civil

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, I believe in same-sex marriages, however, I don’t agree with them raising children’s. Same-sex marriages don't offer a decent atmosphere for raising kids while marriage between distinctive genders endorses the established conviction of the marriage…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is still skepticism from opinions that range in a form of discrimination because neglect is present. Their demand to be able to enjoy the benefits and recognition of being married are irrelevant showing an effect on the family as a whole. Because it is so controversial it gives way to confusion in establishing the fact, that it is indeed a marriage that same-sex couples share with one another. In my opinion they have put same-sex couples as second class status and deemed there is little room to recognize their form of long term relationship. Same-sex couples have been denied the benefits that heterosexual couples are given. The mode of acceptance in society has not improved, even though there are indications that this change in opinion, will prove to be beneficial for all society today. Repetition of inequality of rights through past history has shown its devastations of cruelty on society or have we forgotten this…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ham and Cheese with Koko

    • 1205 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Common Argument #3: The purpose of marriage is to procreate, and same-sex couples can’t have children.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage." The Tech (M.I.T.) February 20th, 2004: "Homosexual relationships do nothing to serve the state interest of propagating society, so there is no reason to grant them the costly benefits of marriage. [...] When a state recognizes a marriage, it bestows upon the couple certain benefits which are costly to both the state and other individuals. Collecting a deceased spouse's social security, claiming an extra tax exemption for a spouse, and having the right to be covered under a spouse's health insurance policy are just a few examples of the costly benefits associated with marriage. In a sense, a married couple receives a subsidy. Why? Because a marriage between to unrelated heterosexuals is likely to result in a family with children, and propagation of society is a compelling state interest. For this reason, states have, in varying degrees, restricted from marriage couples unlikely to produce…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeff Jordan Parity Thesis

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeff Jordan has made two theories revolving rights of same-sex marriage. They are called the parity and difference thesis. The parity thesis supports same-sex marriages, and the difference thesis opposes it. He has made assumptions that makes him believe it is acceptable to discriminate against homosexuals because of their sexuality. In means of the parity thesis, we should only discriminate homosexual behavior if it is done in public. His entire focus on the claim that homosexual behavior is only acceptable in private because if done publicly can involve an unwilling participant.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koppelman refutes this view by showing that “gay households have stable loving households of their own and are raising children very competently.” Koppelman’s fifth premise is the there is not enough evidence to show that legalizing gay-marriage will destroy the world’s view of the word marriage and family. In Summary, Koppelman shows why he believes same sex marriage should be…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doma Unconstitutional

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to same-sex marriage, I hold a very staunch position in supporting it and I claim to be an advocate for it. My opinion when it comes to same-sex marriage is that they are not harming anyone or anything by getting married and in fact I see that several same-sex couples that tend to be better parents then heterosexual married couples, such as my parents who divorced when I was in 11th grade because my mom was no longer in love my dad after 20+ years. Yet we have same-sex couples who never marry but stick by each other through the thick and the thin for as long as married couples. According to the book “Discrimination is an action—unfair treatment directed against…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same-sex marriage has been an on-going battle for many years. California’s opposition to same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, barely passed in the 2008 election. Same-sex marriage has been a news-worthy topic since 1997 when Hawaii passed a Domestic Partnership policy which triggered other states to change policies as well. This issue started a state-to-state debate of whether same-sex couples should have the same rights that heterosexual, married couples have. This debate between states has reached a Congressional level. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases surrounding this on-going debate. The cases the Court will hear are related to allowable benefits for same-sex partners, and California’s ban on gay marriage.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marriage and Individuals

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In both essays, Wolfson and Sullivan expressed that same sex couples have been mistreated by our society, especially on the right to be married. According to Wolfson, “No matter how long they have been together as a couple, no matter how…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who is to say who we can and cannot marry? The main issue is that homosexuals cannot explore the chance of marrying the one the love, while heterosexuals can marry freely. This action of not being allowed to being married is an act of being inferior than others, and dehumanizing. Sullivan and Bennett aren’t the only ones with beliefs on gay marriage; there will always be an opinion of gay marriage. Now that gay marriage is a possibility across America, people have become more open minded, time is changing. Who knows maybe gay marriage will be accepted as straight…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent years gay marriage has become among the most debated topics. Many books, blog posts, editorials, and articles have been written by advocates of both sides of the argument. Andrew Sullivan, in his article “For Gay Marriage,” supports the idea of marriage for homosexuals. He believes that the idea of marriage is constantly evolving and will eventually grow to accommodate homosexuals. The counterpart of the article, “Against Gay Marriage” written by William J. Bennett, argues that gay marriage will be too drastic of a change for the fundamentals of marriage. The article continues to state that changes that have already occurred need to be undone because the basic ideas of marriage are being destroyed. Sullivan and Bennett both share the definition of marriage in their articles, but each illustrates his own interpretation of the definition.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Writing Project three

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legalization of same-sex marriage is fought strongly by both sides. Those against same-sex marriages fear legalizing them would diminish traditional marriages, along with having other concerns. The main view of those for same-sex marriage legalization is that they see it as a right to gays and lesbians. The question is which side is right? Would the legalization of same-sex marriages take away from traditional marriages or is it a right not being honored? The question of same-sex marriage brings with it the question why. Is it important for same-sex marriages to be legalized considering that same-sex couples can live in cohabitation even in the states where same-sex marriages are illegal? These are a few of the age old questions pertaining to the issue of same-sex marriage legalization. While many American’s view on marriage is that they are between a man and a woman, there are still several who believe same-sex marriages should be legalized.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This issue is important because the governments as well as citizens have been battling around whether it should be prohibited or legalized. The definition of marital union has been controversial for many years in politics and in regards to the constitution. I believe that marriage is a human right to openly express themselves to someone they truly love and would like to have a full life with, and someone’s sexuality should not be a factor in the matter of if they can get married.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics