The Old Rwanda vs. The New Rwanda
For the past two thousand years, civilizations, empires, and countries frequently have issues dealing with misunderstandings between ethnic groups. The American Civil War, the Spanish Civil War, the French War of Religions and the Roman Civil Wars are examples of civilizations that have gone through fights between two sides of the same people with different ideas on how to run their civilization. The wars might be gruesome, but it ultimately helped them come upon a new agreement. The 1994 genocide of Rwanda is an example of two ethnic groups trying to establish a new government that both sides agree upon. Since the 1994 Genocide of Rwanda, Rwanda has improved its status in the world by improving government stability, better economic status, eliminating social crisis, enforcing justice for those who suffered during the 1994 genocide, and receiving assist from others who want to help their situation. Many countries were criticized for not helping Rwanda, but Rwanda would possibly be more spoiled if they were helped by developed countries. The Tutsis and Hutus suffered from the selfishness of the ethnic pride, military, and government. Since the 1994 Genocide of Rwanda, Rwanda has changed the government system for the better. Once colonized by the Belgians, Rwanda is now a Republic with a multiparty government. After the independence from Belgium in 1962, it all started with a Tutsi monarchy, then a One Party military government, to today a Republic with a multiparty government. Rwanda has changed their government system multiple times, but every time they have taken a step they have somewhat improved their governmental system. What is now a Republic with a multiparty government is formatted by the head of state who is the President, the parliament and the judiciary branch. The president in Rwanda is allowed to do much of what the president of the United States is allowed to do. For example the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document