Preview

Rule Utilitarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rule Utilitarianism
1. Rule utilitarianism is to make sure the rule promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Rule utilitarianism sees things objectively with consequences and develops the rules. In this Nurofen case, they do deceptive advertising which sell new type of medicine with the same ingredients of drug in different package and double its pricing. This is intended to increase their company profits. But, Nurofen did not think about their brand name in the long term. After being found by ACCC, they will lose market share and people trust on their medicine. Moreover, this is not aligning with the rule utilitarianism. The rules said telling the truth is the best way to achieve utilitarianism’s goal. Also, this is not making greater

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rule utilitarianism focus on following rules rather than a case by case scenario. Rule utilitarian will look to prior history to see what actions have been taken in similar situations; therefore, there is no concern to “immediate” happiness. They are not concerned with pleasure and pain. They are concerned with long term consequences and the benefits of the whole society. They are concerned with the greatest good. A rule utilitarian will inform Arthur to not purchase the artworks. He will inform Arthur that if he was to purchase the looted artworks, the consequences will be dire. The money will go towards the terrorist organization. The terrorist will then use the money, from the looted goods, to do harm to the whole community and society; therefore, it is wrong to purchase the artworks. The rule utilitarian will also argue that by buying a stolen item is immoral and displays egoism. He will bring up the “golden rule”. Rule utilitarian do not take in any personal account. They will argue that there is order in the world. If Arthur was to purchase the items, it will mean that humanity accepts and enables theft. Given the example about starvation in the community and if murder would be a solution, rule utilitarian would vote to not kill anyone within the…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says an action is right insofar as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that "the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to analyse the ethical decisions made, it is important to assess the patient holistically. It is important to assess the impact that the symptoms may have on the patient’s quality of life. For instance, would amputating her leg immobilise her? Physically, if the patient is to remain not amputated would that increase the risk of infection or would the ulcers worsen? The risk factors should also be assessed, for instance, would amputating impact her social well being by immobilising her. If this were to be the case it would have a direct impact on her emotional and economical wellbeing, because with her unable to mobilize she may have to spend money…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rule Utilitarianism is based only on one single rule, which is utility. According to this theory, it is immaterial whether the utility provides any happiness or not. According to this theory, it is the value of the consequences of a particular act that counts while determining whether an act is morally correct or not. The value of consequences of an act is determined by the number of positive outcomes that can result for the greatest number of people.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a further division between utilitarians; Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Rule Utilitarianism, holds that one should always follow rules that tend to promote the general welfare of humans for example a rule might be not to killing people. Act Utilitarianism holds that one should always act to promote the general welfare.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism can be classified in two distinct ways, act and rule. In these ways the utility principle is applied differently. Act-Utilitarianism is concerned with treating each moral situation as unique; therefore, applied the utility principle to each act. The Fundamentals of Ethics states, “Rule-utilitarianism is the version of rule consequentialism that says that well-being is the only thing of intrinsic value” (Shafer-Landau, Russ G-6). This means rule-utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utility principle. Furthermore, rules are right if they produce greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 2 main types of utilitarianism, the first I will talk about is Rule. Rule utilitarianism has certain principles involved with it, and from these, certain actions that we commit are able to be deemed as unacceptable. The principle of utility is therefore applied to a rule so the rule will stay if it leads to greater happiness for more people. This therefore means that if you do something bad that may lead to many people being happy, it could go against a rule or principle that has been set down in Rule…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two forms of utilitarianism are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of individual actions and how those involved will be affected. The right course of action to take is the action that will produce the most overall happiness. An example of act utilitarianism would be whether or not to tell a patient they have a serious, life-threatening illness. Telling them would cause much unhappiness; therefore lying would be the right decision. While act utilitarianism concentrates on individual actions to maximize happiness, rule utilitarianism states that moral codes should be used. A set of moral codes would better distinguish what is right and what is wrong. The moral rules are used to produce overall happiness for society. This form of utilitarianism explains that we should utilize the optimal moral code to maximize happiness. The same example above can be applied to rule utilitarianism. The doctor would need to consider moral rules. As a doctor, what is morally right? In this case, telling the truth would be the right decision.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the ethical arguments that we have seen, it is clear that a form of utilitarianism is the best option, that is, we should always do what brings about the best outcome where the outcomes are rated by the amount of good they bring about. The utilitarian argument says that in any given decision, the option that brings about the most good is the right thing to do every time. That being said, the definition of good is extremely important to the soundness of the argument. In this case, the best view of what is good is that of a hedonist, that is, a thing is good if it brings about pleasure and bad if it brings about suffering. To add to this however, I would argue that the best good outcome is the outcome which…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays