Preview

Rousseau Equality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
315 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau Equality
Rousseau, your claims on the state of nature are questionable. You first claim that people equal in nature and thus are in a better state in nature. Yet, you then state that nature makes people more physically apt and that only the strong can survive. This would imply that a form of inequality, a natural prejudice would form against those not physically capable. Thus, you contradict yourself by stating that nature is equal and then imply a form of inequality in nature. In addition, it is important to raise the question: why do we even need a social contract in the first place? At some point in time in order for mankind to survive, they have to enter into a civilization. In order to for people to retain their natural equality, according to you,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By June 17, 1789, the king of France, Louis XVI, was out of money and the entire country was paying the price. The Estates General had convened, which signaled the failure of King Louis XVI to effectively manage the finances and estate system of his country. At this Estates General meeting, many representatives of the Third Estate disliked the system of voting by estates and broke off to form the National Assembly. The National Assembly of France then drafted the guiding document for the French Revolution, The “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” on August 26, 1789. The ideals of natural rights and equality for men in this document came from the brilliant political philosophy of John Locke’s “The Second Treatise on Government.” This document was also influenced by Rousseau’s ideals of acting for the general will and popular sovereignty which he detailed in his book “The Social Contract.” “The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen” is the most crucial element for the formation of a new government system in France because it used the ideals from John Locke and Rousseau to ensure equality, popular sovereignty, and freedom, which had so often been denied…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's “the Origin of Civil Society, Rousseau presents Ideas that, in his society, were considered very radical. He points out that a Society was in a natural state and that when we were that we were born free, and when we subject ourselves to a king, he must hold up certain rights and protect them, and in return they give him power, what Rosseau called the “Social Contract” . Thomas jefferson 's “Declaration of Independence” is Dirrived from Rousseau 's text about “rights” and “the Social Contract.” The ideas that Rousseau has written about are greatly applied to the ideas that Thomas…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who lived from 1712 to 1778, was a man of many things. Rousseau was a composer, philosopher, and a writer in the 18th century. His political philosophy influenced the Enlightenment in France and across Europe, as well as aspects of the French Revolution and the overall development of modern political thought. Rousseau's also had ideas about education.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After explaining how the state of nature evolved into civil society when people began to rely on each other for resources, Rousseau concluded that the social contact that made civil society possible is more important that the individuals who created it. Although civil society created inequality, it also created freedom, morality, and rationality, which make people human. On the other hand, Locke explained that the state of nature evolved into civil society because people wanted to protect their property and liberties. He concluded that civil society exists to benefit the people; if the present government fails to do so it should be overthrown.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Would you rather live in a world, where everything is equal? Every American is fully equal, meaning that no one is dimmer, uglier, weaker, and slower that anyone else, sounds good right? Non the less a world where the beauty is cast away by a mask so it won’t be distracting, the strong would be chained up in handicap and the intelligent has to wear huge ear muffs that sends loud signals to interrupt any thoughts of intelligent. In the short story, “Harrison Bergeron” written by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. that world exists of the year 2081. In that world Kurt Vonnegut, portrays the danger of total equality.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau describes the conception of inequality in A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by asserting, “there is hardly any inequality in the state of nature, all inequality which now prevails owes its strength and growth to the development of our facilities and the advance of the human mind…” (Rousseau, p. 116). Within the state of nature, Rousseau explains “equality might have been sustained, had the talents of individuals been equal…but, as there was nothing to preserve this balance, it was soon distributed…” (Rousseau, p. 94). Eventually, property rights “gave rise to the first rules of justice…” (Rousseau, p. 94) and “[man] perpetually employed in getting others to interest themselves in his lot…[and] find their advantage in promoting his own” (Rousseau, p. 95-96). He further explains that this inequality is made “permanent and legitimate by the establishment of property and laws.” (Rousseau, p. 116). Rousseau contends that the rich in society began to…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, Hobbes imagines the state of nature as what would result if humans were free from laws and societal expectations, a conception which has latent problems. Conceiving of the state of nature in this way predisposes Hobbes to imagine simply taking already-socialized human beings and freeing them of the constraints of civil society and the force of authority. In Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau argues that Hobbes, and other political theorists, have not removed the effects of society from their conceptions of natural man. Rousseau writes that his objective involves “separating what he [man] derives from his own wherewithal from what circumstances and his progress have added to or changed in his primitive state”…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equality can be hard to define. In my opinion, equality is the state of being equal or having the same rights or social status. After reading the short story, "Harrison Bergeron", I concluded that this story is an inaccurate example of equality. The government forces citizens to wear handicaps to prevent anyone from being smarter, better looking, or more talented than anyone else. I strongly disagree with this. I think that this is taking away their rights. Citizens should be able to be themselves and express themselves in any way that they choose as long as it doesn't harm anyone around them.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kurt Vonnegut’s short story "Harrison Bergeron" is set in the future (2081), when the government has supposedly made everyone “equal.” The people of this era are forced equal by technology. These people are denied individuality, and the governments have taken their freedom by enforcing laws. Vonnegut’s story is a satire because the society he depicts is not truly equal, but rather a totalitarian regime under the pretense of equality. I will examine how Vonnegut seems to be implying that in such a society, the government gains too much control and people gradually lose their individuality.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Rousseau

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rousseau and Locke both provide arguments for how they would protect their citizen’s liberty and equality. However, Rousseau’s society was more likely to protect their liberty and equality by establishing a political order, that was the Sovereign and the social contract. The Sovereign, looked over the general population and ensured that all the laws that were passed were for the general good, and the social contract would ensure that the Sovereign would not abuse their power for their own good. Locke, however, had the same idea except rather than having a social contract keeping checks on everyone, the legislative and executive branch would keep each other in check. Having people keep each other in check instead of relying on a social contract would be a more efficient way to ensure that one group could not abuse their power. Overall, however, Rousseau proposed a strategy that would protect the people’s liberty and…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Rousseau man should want to live in the natural state. Nithin Coca is a journalist who writes from Colombia University discusses Rousseau’s ideas about the Natural State by saying, “Man in his natural state had more equality and freedom from…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau states that Hobbes and Locke mischaracterize the state of nature, since man is not motivated by greed, envy or material things in a true state of nature. From Rousseau point of view man would be motivated by love to the self and self preservation. Rousseau expresses how animals does not have a need for material things and they life in a state of nature.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays