Preview

Rousseau and individualism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1947 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau and individualism
Forced to be Free Ever since the fall of feudal societies, all men have shared an obsession with individualism. Even in the days of fierce nationalism during WWI, the idea was still seen as the individual’s endorsement of the state rather than the state’s imposition of an idea. This obsession with individualism reaches not only politics, but art, culture, and even religion (the protestant reform); these ideas shape our modern world and are a driving force in the way each of us think in our daily lives. During the time of Rousseau these ideas we just taking off, with thinkers like Hobbes and Locke were carrying the idea forward. However, what Rousseau provided in his works, in particular piece The Social Contract challenged those notions of individualism, highlighting holes in reasoning as well as exposing the inherent flaws that lie in a hyper-individualist society. Rousseau sought to counter previous notions of not only primitive man, but of the way man should be ruled in a society. Of his theories, which are many, there exists one idea above them all and serves as the cornerstone upon which Rousseau frames most of this later works: The General Will. These ideas of common good and “general will” stand alone, but also serve as a foundation for thinkers like Marx and it is in many ways to communism what Locke is to capitalism. It is important to note that Rousseau does not reject the notion of the individual, in fact, Rousseau endorses the notion that individuals control the real power in a society; the difference arises in the way these thinkers deal with the individual vis-à-vis The State. This fissure on ideas finds its roots in how Locke and Rousseau differ in their imaginations of primitive man and the state of nature. For Locke, a man’s primary value is freedom. A freedom then cannot be infringed upon, lest the individual return to the state of nature to seek his full level of freedom – man in the state of nature is essentially the same man under a state,


Cited: Gildin, Hilail. Rousseau 's Social Contract: The Design of the Argument. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1983. Print. Huffmen, James. About Japan: A Teacher 's Resource. Japan Society, 21 Apr. 2008. Web. 30 Oct. 2013. Johnson, Merwyn S. Locke on Freedom: An Incisive Study of the Thought of John Locke. Austin, TX: Best Print., 1978. Print Locke, John. Two Treaties of Government. New York: Legal Classics Library, 1994. Print. Noone, John B. Rousseau 's Social Contract: A Conceptual Analysis. Athens: University of Georgia, 1980. Print. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Lester G. Crocker, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The Social Contract ; And, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. New York: Washington Square, 1967. Print. Works Consulted Viroli, Maurizio. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the "well-ordered Society" Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    00-Sep-2016 Asma Ahmed Bham Shaping Modernity - Essay Assignment “In what way does Burke’s speeches before Parliament reflect some of the ideas articulated by Rousseau in The Social Contract?” The social contract is about people exchanging their political freedom for protection from their ruling body. Going back to initial idea of the social contract by Thomas Hobbs, who talks about the relationship between the ruler and those they rule, says that there is an exchange between these two parties- freedoms for protection.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in his Social Contract, argued that in every country the sovereign voice of government…

    • 3293 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau describes the conception of inequality in A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by asserting, “there is hardly any inequality in the state of nature, all inequality which now prevails owes its strength and growth to the development of our facilities and the advance of the human mind…” (Rousseau, p. 116). Within the state of nature, Rousseau explains “equality might have been sustained, had the talents of individuals been equal…but, as there was nothing to preserve this balance, it was soon distributed…” (Rousseau, p. 94). Eventually, property rights “gave rise to the first rules of justice…” (Rousseau, p. 94) and “[man] perpetually employed in getting others to interest themselves in his lot…[and] find their advantage in promoting his own” (Rousseau, p. 95-96). He further explains that this inequality is made “permanent and legitimate by the establishment of property and laws.” (Rousseau, p. 116). Rousseau contends that the rich in society began to…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His theories severely degrade philosophies regarding divine right and emphasize natural as well as manual labor. In Émile, Rousseau makes this quite clear by stating that of all the trades "which can furnish substance to man, that which most nearly approaches to the state nature is manual labor...do not work from necessity, work for glory. Lower yourself to the splendor of the artisan in order to be above your own" (Rousseau 232-233). Although his beliefs regarding the government 's role in society could be considered by some as oppressive or totalitarian, Rousseau 's writings played an incredibly important role in Europe 's individual rights…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Morton, W. S. & Olenik, J. K. (2005). Japan: It’s History & Culture (4th Ed.). McGraw-Hill.…

    • 4502 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is amour-propre? What role does it play, according to Rousseau, in the Discourse on Inequality?…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Spark Notes, Editors. "The Social Contract." Spark Notes. N.p., May . Web. 19 May 2012. <http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/socialcontract/section2.rhtml>.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scruton, Roger. "Rousseau & the origins of liberalism." New Criterion 17.2 (1998): 5. Biography in Context. Web. 29 May 2014…

    • 2581 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau describes the state of nature and the origin of chance events that gave birth to a civil state, where men build social relationships and developed reason. His description of state of nature is very different from that of Locke and Hobbes, as he believes that state of nature is actually better than the civil society. According to Rousseau, civil state is the culprit behind destroying the rudimentary man. It is surprising to note that Rousseau prefers state of nature over civil state, where savage humans live amicably. Rousseau indirectly criticizes Hobbes’ way of examining original man’s traits that developed because of living in a society. Through his thought experiment, Rousseau tries…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Is Slavery Justified

    • 1971 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Locke, John. The Selected Political Writings of John Locke, Ed. Paul E. Sigmund. New York: Norton Paperbacks, 1999.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frankenstein

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Bertram, Christopher. "Jean Jacques Rousseau." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Standford: 2012. Web. 25 Feb. 2013…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In ancient times all men lived in a state of nature until hardships and the necessity to form a civil society between one another became eminent. Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract,” analyses the steps and reasoning behind this transition. In Rousseau’s work he focuses on several key terms in order to define this transition clearly, they include: state of nature, social contract, civil society, general will, and the sovereign.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    asignment

    • 1343 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Social Contract is one of the single most important declarations of the natural rights of man in the history of Western political philosophy. A social contract is an implied agreement between the governed and the government. It introduced in new and powerful ways the notion of the “consent of the governed” and the inalienable sovereignty of the people, as opposed to the sovereignty of the state or its ruler(s). The concept is based on the theoretical idea that governments or rulers are legitimate if they have the consent of the governed. Therefore, a social contract is the agreement whereby a government is granted authority by its people to govern them. Social contract theory has been a dominant political theory in the modern history of the West, which was first explained thoroughly by Thomas Hobbes and further explained and modified by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. It has been acknowledged repeatedly as a foundational text in the development of the modern principles of human rights that underlie contemporary conceptions of democracy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics