Preview

Ross Douthat The Marriage Ideal Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
834 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ross Douthat The Marriage Ideal Analysis
Keneshia Estime
Homosexual Rights
Professor Rowland

"I do" is the simplest complete sentence in the English language that most people in love yearn to hear. "I do" epitomizes one of the most universal desires of mankind;marriage. Traditionally to most, marriage is the union between a man and woman with the intentions of procreating and rearing of children in a family. However, there is no such thing as a traditional marriage. For a plethora of centuries, marriages were arranged for the woman's benefit, love was omitted, and polygamy was normal. To a man born in the 18th century, a monogamous marriage between a man and a woman could be unnatural, but that is not how time has evolved. Today in America and many other countries, marriage is just an emblem of love. Hence the reason two people of any sex should have the right to marry.
…show more content…
In the 15th century, some people vowed together for political reasons. King Henry VII of England married Elizabeth of York with the hopes of appeasing both rival dynasties. In the past, marrying at fourteen was acceptable; today in the twentieth century that is irrational and proves traditions have been revolutionized and everyone has the right to marry. In Ross Douthat's "The Marriage Ideal", she emphasized the fact that "traditional marriages" is no longer an accepted term. "There is no such thing as traditional marriage. Given the prevalence of modern and ancient examples of family arrangements based on polygamy, communal child-rearing, the use of concubines and mistresses and the commonality of prostitution, heterosexual monogamy can be considered "unnatural” in evolutionary terms" (Douthat, NY

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sex and Marriage

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marriage has been one of the most fundamental principals of human society since the beginning of time. Traditionally understood marriage is restricted to two people, particularly a women and a man. Since the nature of marriage is changing with modern times and people are marrying for love not just social needs should the notion that is reviewed by society and this long- confirmed definition be reconfigured and opened in order to make same-sex marriage suitable in society or refuse same-sex marriage? More than half of all people in the United States oppose gay marriage, even though three fourths are otherwise supportive of gay rights. This means that many of the same people who are even passionately in favor of gay rights oppose gays on this one issue (Bidstrup). Many moral controversies revolve around gay marriage such as, marriage is an institution between one man and one woman and gay relationships are immoral. John Corvino rejects the view that homosexuality is immoral in his article, “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex? A Defense of Homosexuality.” He responds to two arguments against homosexual sex, that it is unnatural and harmful. Unnatural refers to that which deviates from the norm, from what most people do. Corvino distinguishes various senses of “unnatural” and his overall conclusion in this regard is that homosexual sex is not unnatural in any morally relevant sense. He defends the practice of homosexuality against the charge that is harmful. He takes issue both with the claim that the practice of homosexuality is harmful to those who engage in it and with the claim that others are threatened by it (Mappes). Many people believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman because that is the view installed throughout the Bible. One major notion commonly heard is, God made Adam and Even and that is what binds marriage and morality. Many believe same-sex marriage is immoral but who is permitted to determine the morality of…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.”(Pride and Prejudice 1.1-2). Simply put, marriage is an agreement between two people to be joined together for the rest of their lives, but as shown in two passages from novels, Pride and Prejudice with Mr. Collin’s proposal along with Our Mutual Friend and Mr. Headstone’s proposal, there can always be added twists and turns to each marriage. The proposal of Mr. Headstone to his respective woman is more rhetorically effective than Mr. Collin’s proposal to his cousin due to Mr. Headstone’s display of his strengths and minimal weaknesses, in contrast to Mr. Collin’s proposal.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many reasons for Henry’s marriages. For example, one of the reasons was to create a political alliance. An alliance is a union or association formed for mutual benefits, especially between two countries. It was important for England at the time because they were still a developing country despite the money and power they had. An alliance would…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Stephanie Coontz discusses the change marriage has made among the different cultures around the world and how it went from being an act that was necessary to something that was done for personal joy and fulfillment.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “The Radical Idea of marrying for Love,” Stephanie Coontz voices her opinion on George Shaw theory, the expectations of love and how it has changed over time. Shaw believes that marriage is “an institution that brings together two people under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions (Coontz 378). Marriage overtime had different variations depending the time frame in which it was in, and the culture that influenced it.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holland, Karen. "What We Can Learn from Sitcom Relationships." Marriage Counseling Denver. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Feb. 2014.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    purpose. No ideology can erase from the human spirit the certainty that marriage exists solely…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    xvi. Interrelated or interactive categories of social experience that affect all aspects of human life…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is an important aspect of our society and has been a recurring theme throughout the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stephanie Coontz’s essay on “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” shows her opinion that the expectations of marriage are unrealistic based on different societies around the world in different time periods. For example in George Bernard Shaw’s theory, he believed that married was “an institution that brings together two people under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions” (qtd. I’m Coontz 378). In our history all of the world marriage has been said to be a tool of survival. Emotional love played a small part in marriage and was even sometimes discouraged. Even in today’s world love is still no seen as a necessity of marriage.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article” The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love “the author gives a global interpretation of what marrying for love means to different cultures. While Americans strive to focus on the love connection before marriage, the writer of the article Stephanie Coontz points out that other countries practice the total opposite. Although marriage is an institution that brings two people together, Coontz describes this as being “under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions” and are required to feel excited about each other every day for the rest of their lives until death do them apart.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that 30% of marriages are arranged marriages? William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is a famous play about “a pair of star-crossed lovers” who endures moments full of drama, love, and excitement. There are many rivals and disagreements that make this play what it is known for today. It’s the differences and similarities between the Capulet’s and Montague’s that make Romeo and Juliet’s love so dangerous and conspicuous. Romeo, Juliet, and the Capulet’s impulsive behaviour led to very irrational decisions and actions that contribute to the tragic ending of the play.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marriage Ethics Paper

    • 2488 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just because someone doesn’t love the same way as you do does not make them wrong or make them crazy, it makes them unique. Majority of people around the world feel that marriage should be between a man and a woman and that gays should not have that right because they believe being gay is morally wrong. If being gay is morally wrong then why are their gay people? That is like saying being white is morally wrong. People honestly who believe this don’t really stop and think outside the box and think that what is in the bible is right. If you look at the ethical reason behind why people believe that gay marriage is wrong, it is purely due to discrimination. There are no real reasons why gay marriage should not be allowed, there are only reasons based on opinions, and one's own bias reasoning.…

    • 2488 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Informal Logic

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the United States marriage laws are not supposed to discriminate, yet many people believe that marriages are clear religious and official vows, between a man and woman, which include the ultimate expression of love. The traditional belief does not claim a specific sexual orientation for homosexuals in this country who are Americans, and have the right to marry. This essay identifies specifically to the question; “Should homosexuals be able to marry.” Some people say “yes” and some say “no. Therefore, an evaluation of the marriage laws for the United State that allows homosexuals marriages, and the fact that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Constitution claim that homosexuals are equal, and have the same rights and limits as heterosexuals.…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marriage continues to be a popular institution in the United States. Although looking at the statistics in regard to marriage today you can see how commitment to marriage is faltering. Due to over half of all marriages ending in divorce, the institution of marriage and what it represents is continually coming into question. In researching different theories in Sociology, the central idea of symbolic interactionism, and how we attach meanings to symbols, is the key to understanding how we view the world and communicate with each other. This theory was researched by sociologist Herbert Blumer. In this theory human beings respond to things based on the meanings that those things carry for them. The interpretation of what the meanings are is part of our historical social interaction. Marriage and the symbols they use to represent that commitment are lost in today’s society. Part of the reason that people don’t hold marriage to such high regard as they once did, is the symbolic interactionism that represents the sanctity and commitment of marriage has changed…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics