The gender roles within both Rome and Han China were similar. For example, both civilizations were patriarchal. The male was placed in charge because he was the closest to his ancestors, maintained the well-being of the household, and made sure to continue the family’s sense of honor. A difference between Rome and Han China included the family structure. The people of Han China believed that the way an individual acted would reflect upon the whole family and their hierarchy; in contrast, Rome was more lenient on the individual affecting the family’s hierarchy. The reason for the Romans’ lenience was that there was no equivalence of Confucianism in Roman society. Roman hierarchy did not completely rely on an individual’s code and conduct. Although these two civilizations do not relate in their family structure, they are comparative within their method of economical production.
Both Rome and Han China’s civilizations applied the same method of economical production. Agriculture was the main factor within the Roman and Han Chinese economies . During annual harvests both empires received a certain percentage of revenue which funded government activities. The class structures included in the Rome and Han China civilizations were very different from one another. An opportunity for improvement of an individual’s economic and social status was very limited in China; whereas in Rome, it was not so limited. Trade and the lack of interference from the Roman government resulted in more economic mobility within the hierarchy. Additionally, Rome and Han China also compared in their agriculture.
Another similarity that the Roman and Han civilizations shared was architecture. Roads were originally built to assist the journey of the military troops; however, these same roads were later used to spread trade and culture throughout each empire. Rome and Han China had different styles of religious practice. In Han China, Buddhism came to be the leading religion, while in Rome the leading religion was Christianity. Unlike Christianity which maintained its original viewpoints, Buddhism was willing to adapt to the Chinese traditions and beliefs.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Between Han China in 206 BCE- 220 CE and Imperial Rome in 31 BCE-476 CE they had many similarities and differences about political control. The key similarities being how they both had one ruler, and passing on titles; the key differences being how Rome was slightly more democratic than China and how the Roman Church had more power.…
- 461 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial administration in Imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E and Han China from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. had both their similarities and differences. Similarities include general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. One major difference is the method of political control with religion, and the way their leaders were selected.…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China was one of the longest dynasties in Chinese history, however, the Imperial Roman empire lasted even longer. Han China and Imperial Rome share many similarities as well as many differences. Although Han China and Imperial Rome had many similarities (patriarchy, expansion), the differences (recruitment, system of who is in authority) in methods of political control outweigh the similarities because of they had little interaction with each other.…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout history, the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire have both been through periods of great success, but they seem like two totally different civilizations. While this may be true in some cases, the two periods of peace were also very much alike in many ways. During Pax Romana (Roman Peace) and Pax Sinica (Chinese Peace), the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire strived with a centralized government (both civilizations ruled by an emperor) and a similar economy (the way they traded), but differed in the fact that they had very different religions (Confucianism vs. Polytheism), and technological developments (mainly inventions vs. engineering achievements).…
- 692 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences of the control and management of both regions may be attributed to the philosophical ideas and belief systems that existed at the time, influencing political structure in similar ways with only a few minor differences that set the two cultures apart.…
- 957 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The roman and Han Empire were different in their political and governmental control through the use of the monarchy and the republic system. The monarchy of the Han Empire was a method of political control because it really strengthened the power of the government to really crackdown on the citizens to make sure that there were no protests or any riots. This control also showed the kinds of beliefs that they had in Han China. Also another type of political control that they used was the filial piety. Filial piety is the respect for your father and elders. This kept the people in check because they had to respect all their elders and the people that were above them. In the Roman Empire the republic method was more based on keeping the society happy then using political authority power. They would hold bread circuses and different events such as the gladiatorial games to keep them happy and prevent riots. The effectiveness of the system in Rome is demonstrated by the explosion of art, giving credit to people that…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There was a myriad of factors that led to the collapse of classical China and Rome including: different types of political decay, large impersonal forces, and cultural factors.…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Consolidating the Roman and Chinese Empires 1. both empires defined themselves in universal terms 2. both invested heavily in public works 3. both claimed supernatural sanctions a. deceased Roman emperors as gods (imperial cult) i. persecution of Christians for nonparticipation in cult b. Chinese emperor as Son of Heaven i. rule by Mandate of Heaven ii. dependent on just rule iii. heavy ritual duties to maintain relationship between earth and heaven iv. moral government spelled out by writings of Confucius and his followers The Han Dynasty was heir to the Qin state that had unified China in 221 BCE. The first ruler of the Qin established the title of “emperor.” The power of a Chinese emperor was absolute; however, he was subject to various checks on his authority by both high officials and imperial family members. The Romans practiced emperor worship solely in the case of dead emperors. In addition, only certain emperors were accorded divine honors, and always after death. In other parts of the Empire, however, local customs merged with Roman ones. In Egypt, for instance, emperor worship was practiced more widely. This was because the Roman office of emperor combined with the Egyptian notion as Pharaohas-sun-god. Chinese emperors were not considered divine beings. The emperor was called the “Son of Heaven” and was responsible for conducting sacrifices to both Heaven and Earth. The word “Heaven” referred more or less to what we would call “nature”: the succession of day and night, and the motions of the stars and planets. During the first millennium BCE, the concept of the “Mandate of Heaven” was applied. If an emperor oppressed the people, Heaven could withdraw a dynasty’s right to govern.…
- 3046 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
Compare and Contrast the Fall of the Han Dynasty with the Fall of the Roman Empire.…
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han China developed cultural syncretism by using different methods of spiritual beliefs and the gods they worshiped, but developed in similar ways on how they both used methods of family hierchy and also how they structure their government to create more control which was used to build up both societies with similar rule, all of these contributed to making cultural syncretism.…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
China and Rome were astonishing civilizations that managed to advance technology and civilations. Both civilizations were rapidly growing and making changes to the world. The two cultures were pretty similar, yet very different. Their religions were something to be modest about. When it came to religion it helped the decline of both societies, by religion changing. When it came to technology though, its change is what caused the societies to flourish. As for education the both leaders of China and Rome worked on making it easier, evident from the letters, for common people to gain knowledge. Changing things in their kingdom clearly took time. With politics being something of a fight in many respects; came as part living in an ancient society. Peaceful changes in power was a rare occasion in Rome but, highly common in China. Both societies treated each other differently, no matter if it was regarding slaves, or women. The underclass was not treated well not out of hate but out of a well beaten attitude that whoever they were, somehow they were always better. Both societies were similar yet highly different it’s surprising how it came about. When two societies emerge like the Romans and Chinese, we would expect conflict, yet none came about, here is a look into both societies as truly empires.…
- 1381 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were two of the most powerful civilizations to rule…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…
- 369 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays