Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Roman System of Government

Satisfactory Essays
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman System of Government
The Romans had a very systematic government just like the U.S. has today. In the early days of the Roman Empire it was the kings who governed, but around 500 BC a new system of government was created where only male citizens were allowed to govern and take part in voting and making decisions. This system included consuls, Senate, prefects, tribunes, and an assembly. The consuls consisted of two men who controlled the army, decided cost of tax, and made the laws. The two men were also the decision makers on whether to start a war or to subside. If any change to the law or taxes was to be made, both the men had to agree. If one of them did not accede, there was no change made. The two men governed for one year and were voted out if they did not meet the expectations of the people. The consuls didn’t make all the decisions by themselves. They received advice from the Senate and usually did as the Senate advised. The Senate was made of about 600 men who were from rich families. The men from the Senate were to advise and look over the decisions of the consuls. Once a man received a spot in the Senate, he stayed in for his entire life. Most of the consuls ended up joining the Senate. Within the Senate there was a group called the Tribunes, who were people that spoke for the poor citizens. The Tribunes were allowed to deny any law or rule that would affect the poor. Then there were prefects who ran the city by maintaining meat and vegetable markets, and also by hearing cases of the citizens. The male citizens make up the last group called the assembly. They were allowed to vote on big law changes and they elected the consuls, prefects, and the Senators. This system was used for around 450 years and then was once again changed. Around 60 BC the Roman army started to conquer many different places further away from home. During 50 BC, when Julius Caesar was part of the army, the general started to take over and did as they wished without paying any attention to the Senate. After 20 years of the generals taking over, a man named Augustus wanted to make a change after realizing that the citizens were unhappy. Augustus returned the power to the consuls and Senate, but made them give him the power of a tribune for the rest of his life. He made them do this so that he could deny anything that displeased him. This system went on for the next 1500 years.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why having a combination of different governments was because it prevented a select few to have an overwhelming amount of power. The government the Romans where so successful with was a mixture of a monarchy (one key ruler), an aristocracy (rule by few privileged individuals), and a democracy (rule by the people). The Consuls (monarchs) were there to make the important decisions and exercised their power over public affairs. The Senate (aristocracy) was there to settle internal civil disputes and settle foreign conflicts. The people (democracy) were there to decide what course the country would decide to take and what laws reflect the views of the country as a whole. Together, these three “branches” kept each other in check and one couldn't do anything without the consent of the others. The ending result was union and balance in which every member of society had an important role I deciding the course of the country.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carthage government is Oligarchy system of government, since the government is in the hands of few wealthy citizens. While Roman government can be said to be more of democratic rule because the decision making is in the hands of the citizen. Further more, the relationship between Rome and Greeks is a catalyst for representative government practiced by the Rome.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Government consisted of Consuls and a Senate. Instead of having a king, the Romans chose consuls, two of them. The community elected neither of them but instead appointed by the popular assembly the Comitia Centuriata. Each consul serves one year, it's nonconsecutive, term, he could help a second or a third later. Consuls possessed supreme executive power, commanding the army, presiding over the Senate, the proposing legislation, but they could veto the others decision.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | Republican government system; Power was split within several individuals; System was based on a Senate; 3 Assemblies, and an appointed Executive Magistrate; Surrounding cities of Rome had to warfare and admit the primacy of Rome and had to serve the city whenever needed; Before the republican government came into place, kings were ruling q1…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the differences in the government of the United States and ancient Rome is the United States has a two party system, Democrats and Republicans, but Romans had an emperor. Within our two party systems a president is elected into office and the Romans chose an emperor based on their social status. Our president serves a four-year term and no more than two terms. Emperors had no term limits and served for life.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome 's great political achievement was to transcend the narrow political orientation of the city-state & to create a world state that unified the different nations of the Mediterranean world. Rome overcame the limitations of the city-state mentality & developed an empirewide system of law & citizenship. Their genius found expression in law and government, the practical, not the theoretical.…

    • 966 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman government also consisted of the three branches we are familiar with, the executive, legislative, and judicial. "From the Founding of Rome in 753 to 509 B.C. Rome was a monarchy, ruled by kings. In 509 B.C., the Romans expelled the Etruscans and established the Republic. Having witnessed the problems of monarchy on their own land, and aristocracy…

    • 1451 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From C.A. 300 CE to 476 CE Rome began a steady decline to its collapse. Some historians disagree with this and have other theories. One of the other theories is that the Roman Empire did not collapse as the Eastern Empire did not collapse until “Fall of Rome at Constantinople in 1453.” The base of this theory is that the Eastern Empire became the Byzantium Empire, however it was no longer the Roman Empire as there were no longer any Roman Emperors. Another theory by Peter Wells is “The Roman Empire “fell” only in the minds of people who had a particular and limited view of what the Roman Empire was and who understood events such as Alaric’s capture of Rome in A.D. 410 as marking its end.” Wells argues that the change was extremely gradual and continued well past 476 CE. While Wells theory is more valid, the empire still did not exist after 476 CE.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Roman Empire and the Common Good Graphic Organizer Rome had ways and arrangements that help them function. They had parts that work very well and was successful, while others were unfair and not as successful. Purpose of Government Provide public service Grade A http://historylink101.com/2/Rome/roman-aquaducts.htm Rome was very advanced, romans had public roads where carriages drove, they had public baths were a man or women could wash up by putting a special kind of mud on their whole body and washing themselves in a lake.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome had built quite the empire before, during, and after the Conflict of Orders. The million dollar question is whether or not Rome is Democratic. I believe that the Roman Republic was Democratic in most ways, but they had many flaws that needed revising.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    THis essay is to compare and contrast the United States form of government with the Roman form of government. In this, I will be exploring the ideas and procedures that the United States adapted from Rome. I will discuss the similarities and differences. Finally, I will analyze Roman ideas that would still be good for America, as well as Roman idea that America should never consider.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays