By Anita Asare
The ancient Roman society was filled with such a complex system based on traditions, power, and wealth. Roman citizens held on to their pride and their standards of living quite well. Their means of living were quite distinctive compared to other ancient cultures. Some of their traditions greatly equipped American families’ lives in many fashionable ways, including their values. Their ways of life really inspired many elements in the American society.
The Roman society grew from out of a settlement of Latin shepherds and farmers on the Palatine Hill to a strong confederation of united peoples. It greatly exhibited such profound family rituals and respected values. The family was the most important and sacred bond throughout Rome. They had dependent clients and slaves that submitted under the chief’s authority. The leader or chief of the family was the father (paterfamilias). He was the supreme ruler of the entire family. The father was in charge of performing religious rituals and rites concerning the burning fire. The ancient Roman families build strong esteem upon their ancestors and looked upon them with such honor. The families were obliged to worship them as long as they lived because their ancestors brought them together (Morey, Ch.3). In ancient Rome (27B.C-1453A.D), the two main social groups were the patricians and the plebeians (History on the Net Group). The patricians associated with the equestrians and the senate officials making up the Roman upper class. The plebeians associated with the freed people, Latins, foreigners, women in the lower class, and slaves. All together these groups made up the Roman lower class. The middle class was non-existent. These classes were divided based upon economic, political, and military status or power (Talmor Media).
The upper class, which was represented by the patricians descended from powerful noble families. These types of people possessed land and lived in large eloquent homes with their families. Their powers were represented in the Roman Senate greatly compared to the lower class, who hardly had any say in their government. The wealthy patricians isolated themselves from the poorer and non-wealthy groups, by only marrying and doing business with their own members of the upper class (History on the Net Group). This class was made up of extremely well-educated males which had the power to hold certain officers. Since the acquiring of power was not hereditary, it was greatly enforced that in order to achieve power, one must be educated well enough and fight to get the throne. If the members of the Roman class were rich enough, they could enroll as equestrians (Talmor Media).
Plebeians, as well as the freed people, Latins, foreigners, women in the lower class, and slaves we held underneath the upper class (Talmor Media). They were totally deprived of their political rights. Plebeians consisted of artisans and peasants who worked on the plantations of wealthy landowners. There homes were small apartments and they did not possess any huge businesses at all (History on the Net Group). “They offered their services in return received the protection of the head of the patrician family, who became their patron” (qtd. in History on the Net Group).
The society of the Roman people greatly coincides with the American society in many ways, such as family values and traditions. Today in America, the father is the head of the home and they are the breadwinners of the family. The Roman Republic was a strong confederation of states, just like the United States of America. Like, the U.S. Rome beginnings were involved in loose, isolated settlements. The people were not as unified in the past (Morey). In addition, their social classes are similar with the social classes in the United States. The Roman Republic’s classes of society shows the basic elements of the classes found in America, although the Romans did not have a middle class in particular. The poor people in the U.S as well as in ancient Rome were not very popular in society and hardly ever rose into governmental affairs ( Talmor Media). The rich Roman people on the other hand are somewhat like the ones in America, possessing acres of land, businesses, money and a greater opportunity in running in government offices (History on the Net Group). This is the way Roman society was like in the old times.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Rome’s classical period was distinguished by its belief in the laws: imperial law, God’s law and church laws. Rome also believed in human love and forgiveness. The latter…
- 945 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The rich Romans lived a life of luxury. They would host giant parties with lots of food. Also most of the food that the government gave out to the poor’s came from rich Romans homes. The richer Romans were know for there feast they would often serve meat such as partridge or wild boar. On special occasions they would serve flamingo or ostrich. For a special dessert they would have dormouse cooked in honey. Normally during the feast they would have some type of entertainment.…
- 323 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…
- 488 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the Roman Republic there were two classes of people, the Patricians and the Plebeians. Each citizen was born into their role, which means that they could be rich but still be considered a plebeian. Plebeians made up 95% of the population and patricians only made up 5% (Hunt, 149). This strict division between the classes led to many conflicts. This conflict is known as the Struggle of Orders.…
- 670 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Shelton, Jo-Ann. As the Romans Did: A Sourcebook in Roman Social History. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.…
- 1263 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
hierarchy. But in contrast, the Romans were more benign on the one affecting the family’s hierarchy,…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
3) Babylonia had social classes, starting from the top of the social classes consists of free landowning class, which consists of nobles, people of royalty, officials, warriors, commanders, priests, merchants, and some artisans and shopkeepers. Next in the social classes group, are the common people, who usually work as dependent farmers and artisans, whose legal attachment to royal, temple, or private estates made them the primary rural work force in society. The lowest class in the social hierarchy was the slaves, who were…
- 722 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
3. What is the difference between the Plebeians and the Patricians? Plebeians were the poor citizens that were looked at as a filler to the population, hence their nickname pleabs meaning to fill up. Patricians were the wealthy upper class. Other than class distinction, the Patricians had more upper hand: Plebeians always had less rights to property and social rights, then were not even allowed to vote.…
- 775 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
University of Phoenix Material The Roman Republic and Imperial Rome Matrix Complete the matrix below by entering cultural, political, and economic developments that had lasting effects or that are significant of each civilization. The table includes one example.…
- 856 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The roman republic and the roman empire were similar in the structure of their social hierarchies. The social divisions of the roman republic were highly based on economics and consisted of two main groups, the patricians and the plebeians. Descending from the original senators the patrician class was the richer of the classes. The patricians made up the senate and were the only ones who could be consuls and other magistrates. Plebeians made up a larger part of…
- 899 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Analyzing the Roman Society can undergo into these different kinds of perspectives, namely, Functionalist, Conflict, and Symbolic Interaction Perspective. First up is the Functionalist Theory. A Functionalist Theory explains phenomena through functions. It has two elements which are the view from the society as a system of interrelated parts that are interdependent and the general values among society members. So how can we relate Functionalist Theory to the Society? There is only one word for that – Change. Change plays a big role to Functionalist Theory. Society is seen as integrated whole. A change in one part of a society leads to change in other parts as well. Society may change over time, but functionalist believe that…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In her article “The Hellenistic Family,” Dorothy J. Thompson seeks to demonstrate the ways in which changes in the Hellenistic family structure mirrored and influenced overarching societal trends. Additionally, she endeavors to illuminate the limited usefulness of applying generalized family models to the diverse and multicultural environment of the post-Alexandrian Hellenistic world. Through her implementation of a variety of primary sources (i.e., histories, stone inscriptions, papyri, ect.), Thompson presents a balanced and enlightening depiction of the Hellenistic family, which is both firm in its claims and cognizant of its limitations. By assessing the general arch of Thompson’s argument, this review will seek to illuminate both the successes…
- 1629 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Even though some people are on the bottom class and think they are left out they are still a part of a class which mean they do belong somewhere. For all of the groups men had more power and did more important jobs as women took care of the family and did household work. The North Americans had their social rankings dependent on gender and age. The West Africans had their social classes based on their family structure. They also believed that the older you are the more power you had. The Europeans based their social class on Monarchs and nobles held most of the wealth and power at the top of the hierarchy. At the bottom labored the peasants, who constituted the majority of the people. The nobility offered their peasants land and protection. In return, the peasants supplied the nobles with livestock or crops—and sometimes with military service. Within the social structure, few individuals moved beyond the position into which they were born. Most of the social classes are based on the family…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The structure of Roman daily life is quite complex. Considering class systems are involved in the Romans society. The Roman family is called a familia, it was somewhat different than the modern-day idea of a family. The familia included parents and their children as well as grandchildren, in-laws, slaves, clients, and property holdings. The person in charge of this entire household was the paterfamilias.Many over look the Roman way of life including their meals and way they dress, their education style, and the harsh class system of the community.…
- 894 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Ancient Rome had two recognized classes of people living amongst the populace, the patricians and the plebeians. A patrician was described as a person of nobility or someone of noble origin. They had wealth, influence and political power over the plebeians. The plebeians were the commoners of the time, simple farmers and workers who considered second-class citizens and could not be part of the political system.…
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays