Preview

Roman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic
Though the roman empire and the roman republic vary in their political structures they are quite common in the structures of their social hierarchy and reasoning for their downfalls. The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year. The senate was one of two legislative bodies comprised of 300 senators and 10 tribunes who were all patricians. The other body was knows as the tribal assembly and was made up of plebeians who met in a forum to vote on things such as consuls. When Julius Caesar was assassinated a civil war broke out in Rome. The senate was no longer trusted to rule Rome bringing the republic to an end and the empire to a beginning in 27 BCE. An empire is a form of government in which one person -the emperor- had all the real power. Emperors took power through force or inheritance and ruled for life, though many were assassinated. Some emperors embodied peaceful, prosperous, philosophical and basically just "great" praises. Where as others were vicious, mentally disturbed doctoral murders. The reason for the difference between the roman republic and empire is that in the republic the goal was to avoid having one person with too much power where as in the empire it was basically that due to the corruption with in the senate. The roman republic and the roman empire were similar in the structure of their social hierarchies. The social divisions of the roman republic were highly based on economics and consisted of two main groups, the patricians and the plebeians. Descending from the original senators the patrician class was the richer of the classes. The patricians made up the senate and were the only ones who could be consuls and other magistrates. Plebeians made up a larger part of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome Comparison

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though both empires had similar causes for declines, they had different political systems that caused the empires to rise to power. The Han dynasty was built on Legalism, while the Roman empire was built on a republic government. Legalism consisted of strict obedience of the equally applied law, which kept everyone, no matter political, economic or social status, in check. Because the system of the law ran the state, it created a stable political system even when the ruler was weak. Under legalism, success became based on skill and not contacts, so there were more qualified people in office. In the Roman Republic government, the Assembly (the common man) voted each year to elect two new members of the Senate ( the noble and wealthy man). This created a separation of powers that kept internal conflicts at bay. This allowed for Rome to focus more on expansions.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roman and Han Empire were different in their political and governmental control through the use of the monarchy and the republic system. The monarchy of the Han Empire was a method of political control because it really strengthened the power of the government to really crackdown on the citizens to make sure that there were no protests or any riots. This control also showed the kinds of beliefs that they had in Han China. Also another type of political control that they used was the filial piety. Filial piety is the respect for your father and elders. This kept the people in check because they had to respect all their elders and the people that were above them. In the Roman Empire the republic method was more based on keeping the society happy then using political authority power. They would hold bread circuses and different events such as the gladiatorial games to keep them happy and prevent riots. The effectiveness of the system in Rome is demonstrated by the explosion of art, giving credit to people that…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Imperial Rome both exercised political control through similar government structures and social hierarchies. There were many elites who supported Han China’s emperor, Wu di and the “mandate of Heaven.” In Han, their government hierarchies were based on confusium. The followers of this included many bureaucrats, common people, and peasants. Imperial rome had a had a very similar way of ranking these people. Rome had a main leader. Emperor Augustus Ceasar. The top class in Rome was then bureaucrats and politicians, much like Han China. Below them came merchants, common people, and peasants. Then even below them came Slaves used for labor, but this was only used in Imperial Rome. This ranking system was a major similarity between these two civilizations political structure, and structure both civilizations greatly.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Rome was an Empire under the Republic. Differences were the forms of government. In the Republic the people had voting rights and would elect the officials, the Republic was a system based on the rule of law, and a cleverly balanced constitution that was not a written document, but consisted of an accord between the 3 elements, democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy. On the other hand the Empire or Principate, a system based on an emperor. One man had total, absolute power. In the republic there was a collective form of government; in the Principate it was a one man rule (Emperor). Both the Roman Republic and Roman Empire had periods of instability which ultimately caused their demise. Interestingly, each lasted for almost the same amount of time, so it would be difficult to ascertain one as more "successful" than the other. The Roman Republic controlled most of the Italian Peninsula and soon spread into the Mediterranean, they came in conflicts and things started getting hard. Although the dying republic was ruled for a short time by the famous triumvirate; it soon collapsed with the death of Crassus and Julius Caesar became the first Roman Emperor. The Empire itself lasted no longer than the Republic, but its territorial gains were considerably more extensive. The Empire extended to Britain in the West, and to the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers in the East. It encompassed vast numbers of people and thereby spread Roman culture throughout Western Europe. The empire was brought about largely by Caesar who was a man of the people and rose on a popularist platform of protecting the citizens rights against the greed of the senate and redistributing wealth.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman and Han Comparison

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Senate had executive power, while Han emperors presided over a centralized, bureaucratic government headed by a prime minister. As time progressed, empires became mixtures of previous empires� aspects of civilization.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome a. Definition of citizenship changed over time b. Pragmatic innovation and adaptation as empire's ideals c. Common language was Latin C. Patterns of imperial expansion 1. Both consolidated their power within their environmental limits using a common legal framework 2. They had different patterns of development, types of public servants, and government practices 3.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the later part of the Roman Empire’s existence, their political and government was fraught with political corruption and incompetent leaders. The…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Roman government changed from a republic to an empire, this doesn’t seem an easy task for modern day governments. How was it that this occurred? And what impact did Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar have on this change? Julius Caesar, although not completely starting the process, this was begun be Sulla, Caesar did draw the power away from the senate and bestowed it upon himself, partaking in constant wars, instead of stabilising the republic. When he died, Rome fell back into civil war and power was regained by Julius Caesar’s heir, Augustus. Augustus continued drawing Rome away from a republic, as was his only option if Rome was to survive. He was almost completely unchallenged once he took power as his opponents were dead from the war. He began rebuilding the nation and restored it to its prior capacity and further. Caesar was the overall catalyst for the reform and Augustus simply continued with that legacy.…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's the year 509 B.C. and the Romans are finally no longer under the rule of the Etruscan king. They create a republic where they elect citizens to rule. The aristocrats or patricians dominated while the plebeians had almost no say in the government. Plebeian and Patrician were kept apart and where prohibited to marry each other. Plebeians then began electing tribunes who could veto acts passed by the senate Plebeians slowly gained more power until they were able to hold the position of consul, while Patricians still bought power using their wealth. Sometimes in emergency situations the consuls and senate would elect a temporary dictator until the crisis was over. A great example is a farmer who left his farm in a time of war, became dictator and stepped down after defeating Rome's enemies The first Roman laws written down were carved into twelve stone tablets although they would be considered harsh by today's standards. They are as follows females shall remain in guardianship even when they have…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays