Preview

Roman Citizenship Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
507 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Citizenship Dbq
Citizenship has come along way. The citizenship we know today was highly influenced by Athens and Rome. In ancient Athens, it was difficult to become a citizen only a selected amount of men were allowed to become citizens. Becoming a citizen of the Roman Republic was easier, therefore there was bigger variety in the citizenship system. Although citizenship in Athens was more cautious and demanding than the citizenship in Rome, Rome’s Citizenship was better because more people could have become citizens and their system was more organized.
Becoming a citizen of Athens was much harder than Rome. A lot of Rome’s success came from their acceptance of other people coming in into their empire and contributing in any way possible to the great Roman Empire. Athens, on the other hand, didn't really allow other people to become citizens and contribute to their society. On Document A it states that only free, native-born adult males were able to be citizens of Athens. In Rome free, native-born adult males, free, native-born adult females, free, native-born male children, female children and sons of freed slaves could have been citizens.
…show more content…
In Rome, not all citizens had the same rights. This was an advantage for the Roman Republic because the people that were conquered by Rome were accepted and put into three categories Latini, Foederati, and peregrini. It was an organization that allowed the Roman Empire to be so successful. On Document C, Emperor Claudius states, “What was the ruin of Sparta and Athens, but this, that mighty as they were in war, they spurned from them as aliens those whom they have conquered.” This quote tells us why Athens way of choosing people to become citizens was inferior to the methods of the Roman

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What Roman citizenship rights did non-Roman Italians not have? How did this situation change after 88 B.C.? Why did it change?…

    • 4160 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This written assignment will address these questions about Athens and Sparta: How did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office? What rules governed the selection of public office holders? How…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerousia Dbq

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To be considered a “citizen” in Sparta, you had to be: male, could not be a Helot, or Perioikoi, or a slave. There was an assembly of all male citizens, an elder council of men over 60, the Gerousia, and the Ephors that consisted of 5 magistrates. The Gerousia, was an elite elder council of 30 men and was the Spartan equivalent of the senate. The Gerousia was made up of the wealthier and more conservative men. When one of the 30 seats became available in the Gerousia, it was the assembly who chose the man to fill the Gerousia vacancy. The Ephors were elected each year for one, one-year term by the members of the assembly. The assembly consisted of all male Spartan citizens. Becoming an Ephor was the only way to for non-aristocratic citizens to gain political power. The assembly passed laws and was responsible for making decisions concerning war, but it was the Ephors and the Gerousia that selected which matters would be decided by the assembly and the Ephors and the Gerousia could veto the decisions made by the Assembly so the Ephors and the Gerousia generally monopolized the city-states decisions.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    only people who lived in Rome were considered citizens of Rome, eventually the title of citizen…

    • 2352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    n order to to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community in Sparta it meant that you had to be a warrior. Sparta was a Oligarchy witch means "rule of the few". In Athens in order to participate in public life and make decisions you had to be native born, male and free. In Athens your political standing depended on you wealth. The men with the highest wealth could seek the highest political offices. The next step down the ladder were men with slightly less wealth referred to as the horse men. The horse men could serve in lesser political offices and join the army. The middle class could only be elected to low level political offices. The poor and the landless could vote but not hold office or be in the army however they could row the ships. Sparta had far fewer…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The success of the Romans started with their organization within the city. Almost all citizens could vote, and after plebeians were allowed to hold office, almost anybody could be appointed to the Senate and other governmental positions. Voting created a pride in the city, as every person held a stake in the city. It created a sprit that could be seen on the battlefield. Voting also allowed for merit…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like Mesopotamia, Athens might be well known for their system of law and order. Athens saw the beginning of democracy and government like we know it today. In Athens, government now included citizens, not just representatives like in previous systems. For one of the first times in history, regular citizens could play key roles in how their community and government was…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons that allowed Rome was able to flourish was the generous giving of citizenship. That citizenship along with the factor of wealth decided a person social status. Slaves were not considered to have much worth socially. There was disparity of power between the rich and the poor. The rich were always wary of the gatherings of the poor, uneducated for fear of revolt.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Athenian democracy was guided by the principle of isonomy. Isonomy basically means that everyone in Athens is equal before the law, and all citizens have equal participation in creating the law (Breaugh, 2011). Even though citizens are equal in the political sphere, they were not equal in other areas of the polis. The lower classes in Athenian democracy were equal in the sense that they had an equal to vote on the laws, and to have a say in issues that would impact the polis, but the lower class citizens had more to lose by participation, because of pay loss (Breaugh, 2011). Therefore, until the Athenian government introduced compensation of these people, the lower class citizens would not exercise their right to equal participation. As Athenian democracy evolved, the lower classes of the polis participated equally in the assembly, and could possibly have a chance to rule. In the statement Plato says, “Dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike”. The classes were only part of what Plato meant. The people who were not citizens were also given a sort of equality, but not in the polis. Although people who were not citizens of Athens could not participate in the political life in the polis, they had a ’sort of’ equality in Athens (Breaugh, 2011). Slaves had to be treated fairly, although they had no residency rights, or the right to legal advice. Slaves were considered part of the household; they could participate in religious ceremonies, and had basic legal rights. Unlike in most areas with slaves, they could buy their freedom back in the Athenian polis (Breaugh, 2011). Metics were a very important part of the Athenian economy. The only reason that Metics were not allowed to participate was that it was believed that it was impossible to be economically prosperous, and have an active political life. Metics were equal in other aspects, including responsibilities to the polis, including military service.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall’s (1950) theory of citizenship has been discussed and criticised widely as this is where the basis of the concept of citizenship lies. He divided citizenship into three parts. Firstly the civil component, which includes the ‘freedom of speech, the right to own property and the right to justice’ (Marshall 1950 cited in Turner 2003:189). This component is necessary for the achievement of individual freedom. Secondly is the political element; ‘constituted by the rights to participate in the exercise of political power, in particular the rights to free elections and a secret ballot’ (Turner 2003:190). And finally the social component as the right to ‘a modicum of economic welfare and security to the right to share to the full in the social heritage and to live the life of a civilized being’ (Marshall 1950 cited in Turner 2003:190). Marshall further argues that tension has developed in society because of an increasing need for economic profitability, the taxation requirements and the rights of citizens to welfare provisions (Turner 1990). However his theory has been criticised by writers who argue that his argument is complacent and conservative (Roche cited in Turner 1999:192). On the other hand Taylor 2001 uses Aristotle’s notion of citizenship. Taylor maintains that Aristotle recognised that the success and fate of democracy depended upon the quality of its citizens, although…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    geographer

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. How does the birth of an Athenian male differ from the birth of a Spartan Male? (2 points)…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Citizenship Themes

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Throughout the year in Western Civilization, there have been many opportunities to become much more enlightened about the history, theology, and philosophy of the words past and present. After reading novels and readings such as Looking backwards, the Rerum novarum, and even Women on the edge of Time; there are many themes that have a direct correlation between all three. However after analyzing and going through the discussion had between each novel, it seems that the overall theme connecting the stories together is citizenship. The best way to describe citizenship is as the overall burden and commitments that are linked when being a part of society. Throughout these stories a common ideal of citizenship is how utopian work portrays the government…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The definition of a citizen is someone, who was born in the United States of America, and is guaranteed certain rights, privileges, and responsibilities. Citizenship is understood as a right to have rights, such as the right to live and work in the United States and to receive federal assistance. Being a U.S. citizen means I have the right to vote in elections, serve on juries, or hold elected office. Citizenship in the United States means that a person is a legally recognized member of the nation and has equal rights under the law.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Athens, in order to vote someone had to meet two qualifications. The first was that they had to be a citizens. In order to be a citizen in Athens at this time one must be a free man, woman, or child. Slaves were not considered to be citizens at this point in time (Packard Humanities Institute). The second qualification they had to meet was that they had to show up to the Assembly on the day that the vote was being cast. The date in which the vote would be taken was posted in advance and citizens would gather on that day when the Assembly met to cast their vote. This system allowed everyone the opportunity to vote and take part in government (Packard Humanities Institute). Once the votes had been casted they decided whom was the winner based off of majority rule. In order to be considered the winner, one must have fifty percent of the vote plus…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the laws applied to all citizens only free-born men could be the citizens so it’s kind of odd how the rule goes for women, slaves, and children all of which were incapable of being a citizen. Just out of that information it could be easily known as to why I gave Promote Rule Of Law. It was cruel, unfair, and offensive with how the people were treated. The romans had quite the way of using money in their time. When people think of the Romans, they usually think of rich, greedy, and high ranked people, but, that is not true at all. Because most people of Rome were actually farmers, believe it or not, some lived in villages and some even lived on their own farm, so as it is seen most people of Rome were not rich, greedy, or higher ranking. But even when the Romans were mostly filled with farmers, they still traded with many areas, this was so the people of Rome would have more money, food, and basically things that would benefit them. The Romans traded with all kinds of different areas, such as parts of, Europe, Asia, and Africa. All of which had very good trades with the Romans so that everything was in…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays