Most of Roman law, although dated back to the previous Roman Republic not the actual empire, is still significant because it remained in affect throughout their entire civilization. The Twelve Tables marked the beginning of a distinguished history of Roman law, which extended down to the Justinian code of the sixth
. . .
The Roman Senate had executive power, while Han emperors presided over a centralized, bureaucratic government headed by a prime minister. As time progressed, empires became mixtures of previous empires� aspects of civilization.
Religion within the two empires seemed to be on two totally different views. While the Roman Empire performed prayers, vows, sacrifices, acts of purification and atonement to appease their gods, the Han Empire didn�t have gods they worshiped because their beliefs relied on philosophy. Roman ports saw a constant flow of textiles, grain and other foodstuffs, metals such as gold, silver, copper, tin, lead, and iron, manufactured goods like glass, pottery, jewelry, and paper, and luxury items like silk, ivory, precious gems, and spices. Because of this, economy was one thing that the two empires shared.
The three aspects of civilizations mentioned above made the empires who they were. Roman religion and beliefs were shaped by foreign influences in such that they were polytheistic. Roman religion remained constant throughout their empire�s existence, whereas, the Han shifted from philosophy to philosophy; Confucianism to Taoism to Buddhism. Both empires� ideal was, however, the citizen soldier. Han religion, on the other hand, was shaped around the previously established philosophies including Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. During the time of the Roman and Han empires, there was more than enough written documents made to make them easily classified among other empires. Because Roman trade was all over the Mediterranean world including Arabia, India, and China, it is evident that items such as pottery, silk, and precious gems like jade, were exchanges between the Roman and Han Empires.
Bibliography:
Wikipedia, Han Dynasty
Wikipedia, Roman Empire
Bibliography: Wikipedia, Han Dynasty Wikipedia, Roman Empire
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…
- 315 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
From 206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E., the Han dynasty, in China, accumulated many political control methods, as did Imperial Rome reigning from 31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E. However, there were more differences than similarities between the two empires/dynasties. Two main differences were China and Rome’s territorial expansion and their political philosophies (mandate of heaven and monarchy). A similarity between these two empires would be their centralized government adopting bureaucracy.…
- 276 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Bureaucracy was founded on roman law and classical learning local officials. The Roman Army was considered the best trained and best fed, and Augustus was their set model for emperor established principate. Their laws were established by the “Twelve Tables” and they believed in citizenship. The Rome empire government believed in slave labor, while Han China’s emperor was considered the “son of heaven”. Their bureaucracy was founded on Confucian ideas and traditions used by local officials. The Han China Emperor proclaimed laws, as well as military and civilian conscription, and they used confucian scholars as government officials. The Han China empire had no idea of what citizenship was, and their laws were proclaimed by their emperor. While there were quite a few differences between the empires when it came to their government systems, the similarities included both having extensive road systems for the military which doubled as the spread of commerce and culture, due to enemies on their borders, while also emphasizing territorial…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Rome’s political method is centered around polytheism. Han China’s political method is centered around Confucianism during the beginning of the dynasty, and then around Daoism after political changes were made. . Confucianism is defined as more of a philosophy than a religion. Confucius taught philosophical and ethical ideas, that shaped the traditional Chinese culture. Han China, after change in authority, transformed from Confucianism to Daoism. Imperial Rome was centered around polytheism, the worship of many Gods. It is very different than Daoism. Daoism is based upon philosophy and nature, but polytheism is based upon gods. Han China and Imperial Rome express different political methods of control through religion. Imperial Rome and Han China had different ways in which their leaders were chosen. In Han China, rule was gained through ancestors into a centralized bureaucratic authority. In Imperial Rome authority began through certain elements of democracy, not through ancestral…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
- The Greeks and the Romans had a very different religious system compared to Han China that had more of a national philosophy then a religion.…
- 1080 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…
- 935 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
e west and the east, empires dominated the world from the 2nd century BC to the 2nd century AD. The main one in each area being the Roman Empire in the west, and the Chinese empire, or specifically the Han dynasty, in the east. While these two empires are thousands of miles apart and nearly one hundred years, there are many similarities between the two. The most significant difference between the two empires is the basis of government ideals.…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The religion in Rome was much more thorough than the Han religion. Roman rulers organized the state religion while the Han emperors were more earthly. The Han emperors acknowledged the existence of the gods and participated in ceremonies, but didn’t really have much concern for them. Both Empires focused on rituals that would bring loyalty to the empire, but neither of them were extremely spiritual. The Han Empire used Confucian thought as their primary ideology.…
- 75 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In Rome, the emperors resorted to threats and promises, where as in Han China, the emperors relied mostly on the Mandate of Heaven institution and tributes/gifts from the citizens. Both rulers had a slightly different role as well. The Emperor of China was judge, jury, and executioner, whereas the Emperor of Rome could not act without the senate's approval. With military expedition and empire expansion, the methods were quite different. When the Romans conquered a new region, they would enforce soldiers in that region until the tax was collected. After the tax was paid, the Romans allowed the conquered peoples to keep their cultural ways. This also applied to religion. Conquered peoples could remain with their religion as long as they followed the system. In fact, in 212CE, Rome offered citizenship to conquered peoples in exchange for adopting Roman culture. This offer was extended to all free people of the conquered region, and citizenship for them meant they had the right to hold office, serve in legions, and others. However, becoming a citizen did not erase their other identities like religious views. Rome also collected many foreign religions, making the entire empire a college of religious views. Unlike Rome, Han China forced Confucian beliefs upon their conquered areas. When the Han invaded and conquered Korea and Vietnam, they…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The first reason that the Roman Empire and the Han were so powerful is because both had strong central governments. While they were able to do this, each had varying methods of…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays