Preview

Roles Of Federalism In Canada

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1118 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roles Of Federalism In Canada
Federalism is commonly practiced and demonstrated in many countries globally. When looking into the aspect of what federalism truly is, Brooks defines it as “the constitutional authority to make laws and to raise revenue is divided between a national government and some number of regional governments” (224). With this definition in mind, it is important to understand that Canada is one of the many countries that practices and has a high regard for federalism. Not only does Canada have a separation of powers, executive and federal, it also gives opportunities for provinces to make independent decisions, displaying the traits that are sought out for a federalist government. When focusing on federalism, positives and negatives can be not only …show more content…
As federalism gives provinces the ability to make their own decisions, there is an opportunity for them to be unequal to the extent that the education levels of individuals impacts their futures considerably. When focusing on a report comparing education levels between the provinces, including, Alberta, Ontario and British Columbia, each scored an A+, while Newfoundland scored a B when comparing high school attainment (“Education Provincial Rankings”). This large gap suggests that there is an education difference between provinces. A difference as large as this implies that Newfoundland needs to encourage education on their citizens during high school years as their university attainment score is a C, compared to Ontario scoring an A (“Education Provincial Rankings”). This correlation stems from the notion that each province is responsible for education systems, and encouraging their citizens to attend. As British Columbia is the top-ranked province in Canada, and Newfoundland is ranked the third lowest, there are obvious provincial inequalities within the education system, can be attributed to …show more content…
As federalism divides its power between the provincial and federal governments, it creates opportunity for citizens to feel more regional attachment over patriotic attachment, which could result in separatist’s movements as the one seen in Quebec. Although there may be a regional divide, the separation of power is more of an advantage than a hindrance, as it ensures Canada is not ruled by an autocracy. Federalism also generates a chance for provincial inequalities on an educational stance; however, it enables possibilities for provinces to experiment with policy and learn from other provinces as a way to prosper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent did economics in Quebec lead to Québécois nationalism in the late 20th century? To assess the degree to which economics led to the unification of the French-Canadians, this investigation focuses on the events leading up to the 1995 referendum on Quebec sovereignty. The differences between the French and English Canadians, and the connections between their contrasting economies and the Québécois’s demand for reform are explored. The political aspects of Quebec nationalism, as well as events after the 1995 referendum are not assessed in this investigation.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Diefenbaker Vs Pearson

    • 923 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay seeks to compare and contrast the two administrations of John Diefenbaker and Lester B. Pearson from a historical point of view as well as shedding light on their honorable achievements. Diefenbaker was a former lawyer, while Pearson served as the second Canadian ambassador to the US, both had a military background in common. Aside from the obvious differences such as Diefenbaker representing the Progressive Conservatives and Pearson the Liberals, both Prime Ministers had different approaches to governing. The differences amongst the two governments included; the progressive Conservative focusing on the “little man” not the country as a whole while the Liberals focused on nation building having forgotten to build a relationship with their surroundings. Although they both served a term of six years as prime minister, with different political views both men strived for one major goal; maintaining Canada’s independence.…

    • 923 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sir John A. Macdonald is revered as the father figure of Canada, and in his day united various conflicting factions such as the Maritimes and French Canadians - a powerful force in creating a unified Canada. The political quagmire of the 1860s provided no encouragement for Macdonald’s unification goals, as the interests of Canada East and Canada West were paralyzed by incessant political dispute. The French and English blocs in the legislature could not agree on any matter and adding to Macdonald’s discomfort, the prospect of the Maritimes joining grew increasingly bleak. However, Macdonald’s skill as a politician allowed for him to navigate this rough political terrain - forming a strong coalition between Le Parti Bleu under George-Étienne…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Trudeau’s essay to Francois Rocher’s The Quebec-Canada Dynamic or the Negation of the Ideal of Federalism, there are both similarities and differences in their construction. Rocher, states that the interpretation of the direction of the Canadian federalism greatly depends on the origin of scholar who writes it (312). Quebec scholars, argue that the system has forgotten its designed purpose and in turn aims to centralize power within federal authority (Rocher 312). While English speaking Canadians focused on: the links between federalism and democracy in respect to reducing tyrannical behaviour, the degree to which governments have created public policies to address citizen issues (Rocher 312). Additionally, Rocher, uses specific documents…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the United States being Canada’s only neighbor, comparisons and similarities have been made regarding all forms of the two nations for many years. Seymour Martin Lipset tries to explain the difference between Canada and the United States in the 1980s through different aspects, such as religion, economy, culture and politics. However, it is a very difficult task to break down the two country’s similarities and differences through only a few pages. While I believe that Lipset’s arguments on the similarities and differences between Canada and the United States may have been effective in the 1980’s, I do not believe that the same arguments would hold the same weight today as they did back then. Factors have changed within both of the two nations…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Wanna's Analysis

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discussing the outcome of a Roundtable discussion of federalism in Australia, John Wanna reported that "...all three levels of government - Commonwealth, state/territory and local - tended to see federalism as a malaise, not as a source of effective government" (Wanna 2007: 276).…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cause for separatism also caused another reason for turbulence within the province of Quebec, as well as creates a divide within Quebecois society. “Ce discours, qui fusionne nationalisme et socialisme autour de l’idée de décolonisation, s’infiltre dans le débat qui fait alors rage au Canada français entre les nationalistes de droite ou non séparatives et la gauche antinationaliste, pour renvoyer les deux camps dos a dos” (Lapointe, 2008 pp. 299). Those who we’re anti-separatist we’re viewed as non-nationalist in the eyes of those who supported the separatist movement, and those who were against the separatist movement felt a sense of resentment towards those who viewed them as anti-nationalists. While whether or not separatism would be a necessary factor for movement is debated throughout Canada to this day, at this time, this idea was a relatively new and radical opinion. In fact the time period of the 1960s was the very beginning of the whisperings of Quebec sovereignty, with such organizations developing such as the Rassemblement pour l’Independence nationale or RIN. This invoked the development of the more radical parties such as the FLQ, which would go on to become a violent organisation that cast a darker shadow over the Quebecois separatist movement. Of…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1867, the foundations of Canadian federalism was established with colonies agreeing to be “federally united”("Intergovernmental Affairs - Intergovernmental Affairs") As a result of the agreement, Canadian federal system is divided into two levels of government, federal and provincial, with corresponding divisions in legislative responsibilities and powers (Leach 1984) The federal level of government has control over matters related to national defence, foreign policy, banking, criminal law, as well as Aboriginal affairs ("The Division of Powers") In contrast, the provincial and territorial governments oversee property and civil rights, hospitals, prisons, education, and direct taxation (“The Division of Powers). Since…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important structure of a country is its infrastructure. The infrastructure can be defined as the skeleton of the country; it keeps the country stable, connects it from region to region, and prevents it from collapsing. Divisions of the infrastructure may include things like transportation systems, communications systems, the post office, the military, and much more. In Canada, the infrastructure, even compared to other nations of the developed world is very advanced. In every city there is an efficient transportation system, everybody can go to school, our communication system allows us to talk to people across the country and among all others, Canada has a functioning government responsible to the people. The infrastructure that Canadians have provides stability to the people and in turn, creates a high living standard. The nations in the developing world that lack proper infrastructure, though, will find that their standard of living pitifully low because without school to educate their…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Country: Canada There are many different types of government in the world today with different classifications. Canada would be one of those governments. What must known about Canada before it can be classified is the county’s government based on who can participate, the Geographic Distribution of Power, and Relationship between Legislative and Executive Branches of Government. Canada is located north (next to the United States of America boarder). This county is mostly friendly to the US and other countries.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Canada's government the head of it all is the prime minister. The prime minister has the role of leading the political party in charge of the country and has the role of making laws and defines the policies of their political party. Our hearts have similar roles to the prime minister. What they do is send blood around your body. The blood provides your body with the oxygen and nutrients it needs. Canada's prime minister is like a heart because he/she has a role in all branches of the government (Legislative, Executive, Judicial). In the same way the heart controls all parts of the body pumping blood to the places the body needs it.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The advantages and disadvantages of federalism have always been up for debate by the people. Some argue that federalism’s advantages are that it promotes state loyalties by allowing Americans to feel connected or closeness with their state being that federalism with holds that connection because they have given power to its states. Another advantage of federalism is that it uses common sense, in the running of a country with such a diverse population like the United States. Power is given to state and local officials to deal with certain problems, as it is easier being that they understand the problems in the area and would know the best policy to put in place to solve any issues. Lastly, federalism…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays