Preview

Role Of Sri Sharanaru

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role Of Sri Sharanaru
Social development which means human development. A social reformer is anyone who advocates for reform of a certain area of society. "Crusader" and "Meliorist" are used as general synonyms for social reformers. Similarly we may observe one of the social reformers in Chitradurga, of Karnataka state. The world famous ‘Sri Murugha Math’. Dr. Sri Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru is the present president of the Math, The purpose of this Sangama is to find solutions to the contemporary problems of society and to know how best we can adopt these preaching’s in our daily life. Sharanaru thinking about equality, liberty, concepts. . He give a suggestions to politicians about development works of society. Like drinking water, housing, self employment, education, …show more content…
As a representative of Lord Basva principles:- The Sharanaru as a representative of Lord Basava he was social reformer during 12th century. Sharanaru has dedicated himself and the math to propagate the preaching’s of basavanna and other sharanas.The principles of Basava popular by Dr. Sharanaru, equality, liberty, work,[kayaka] rights so and so.. Now-a-days the sharanaru appointed different swamijies to different Maths they belong to different depressed class. Because once upon a time the role of Swamiji reserved for the particular caste only, but the Murugha Math Sharanaru introduced so many swamijies from deferent depressed class. He has given up the suffix “Swamiji” and substantiated it with “Sharana” one who has submitted himself to god. Who make service to uplift of that class. This is one of the most popular principles of equality. He has organized Basava Kendras- Basava Centers- through out the state and country. He has traveled abroad to spread out the message of the Sharanas globally. He has sworn to work for the emancipation of mankind from the materialistic way of …show more content…
Thinker about classless society:- ‘Nobody owns anything but everybody owns everything’ [Karl Marx] Dr.Sharanaru said there are three types persons in our society, such as some are creator of nothing, [vacuum] some are filling the nothing, [vacuum] & some are come out from nothing [vacuum]. So all are belong to nothing, which means all are equal in the view of world. But some ignored persons fighting against property, money, status, power, position etc.. But the society provides equal facilities to all, but in that some vested interests oppressed on delicate & poor peoples. The Sharanaru thinking about equality, liberty, concepts. He has removed all discriminations, propagation of classless, casteless, religious less, society. 13. Philosopher of future life:- No rights to live without labour to anybody.[KARL MARX] Work is worship [BASAVANNA], if you earn the gain in proper way, that is support to development of personality. According to Sharanaru, do something do not sit like a lazy, because the work is support to earning for leading of life, but the laziness support to loss of is your personality. Sahaja Shivayoga has inspirited to maintenance of equality between mind, body and senses. [Vijayavani-1/4/17]. The family members must adopt the harmony nature in family, little bit problems are common between husband and wife, but the conflicts do not know to outside. The male persons must far away from anti social activities. [Group marriage

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels believed that Capitalist society, which is based on the right of each individual to own private property, is the cause of the main class divides evident in today's society. That the basic right to own property results in the ruling class, the bourgeoisie, becoming obsessed with the accumulation of possessions and, as a consequence, becoming slaves to commodities; Commodity fetishism. This resulted, they argued, in the widening of class divisions. Capitalist society is described by some as protecting freedom and individuality. However, it also, undeniably, encourages self-interest, greed and - as Marx argued - an obsession with private property. It is a society whose basis lies in the fundamental need to accumulate property. The people within this society who do not have the means to amass material possessions are pitied, considered the underclass. They are seen to be lacking in something, incomplete, and are encouraged to 'make something' of themselves. To acquire qualifications, a job that pays well, to set themselves up so that they too can begin to accumulate material goods. This, society argues, is what everyone should strive for.…

    • 2330 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is possible to create a classless society between individuals. Pol Pot was a political leader whose communist Khmer Rouge government led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979, he created his Utopia vision of a classless society by bring great destruction and terror to his country and to his people. Pol Pot brought devastation to Cambodia through the use of a group called Khmer Rouge which controlled and instilled fear into the people of Cambodia. He began to forcefully take children from their parents and turning them into soldiers. He destroyed all Cambodia’s political, economic and social aspects.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classism is a big dilemma in several parts of the world such as North America. The word Classism was derived from Class and -ism; the word Class descended from a French word, Classe, and a Latin word Classis. The word was originally created by Servius Tullius in one of the six orders into which he used to divide the Roman people for the purpose of taxation. Those words together make the word Classism which means a biased or discriminatory attitude based on distinctions made between social or economic classes ("classism." Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. 20 Jan. 2012. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/classism>). In this essay I will enlighten why Classism should be abolished due to its differential treatment based on social class or perceived social class. I will prove this by explaining in the following paragraphs about the types of classes & rights in the 20th, 21st and the 22nd century, Urbanization and its effects on class, Social power and rights, and general day to day life.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic system of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, “They have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite” (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits workers who are unfairly treated, he asserts that the proletarians should become the ruling class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, “Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation” (470). This means that no private property should be allowed, and no one has even a less or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would enhance greed, and ambition to win in the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are the rich and there are the ones who are not rich: the ones who are in control, and the ones who are subjugated. According to Karl Marx, the “history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” The clashes and conflicts between these people have shaped all of history.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inequality In Australia

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Class generates inequality- the unjustifiable distribution of opportunity and power and the chance of a good life in a demonstrably unfair society. (McGregor,…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DD102

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The identity of ‘class’ is often called the ‘unspeakable identity’. The reason for this may be that class refers to inequalities based on a small group of people that occupy a greater position within society. Class identity can therefore be defined as ‘a group or collective identity that links economic inequality and social differences, including superior or inferior status and differences of family background and lifestyle’ (Open University, 2015). Inequalities of class are part of British social history with famous theorist Karl Marx being one of the first social scientists to focus on social class. According to Marx there are two classes of people within society, these being the bourgeoisie and the proletariats, or in other words the employers and the workers.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society there are many different factors which divide us and result in social inequality. In this essay, I will be covering social class. Karl Marx believed that in society, there are two major social classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. The bourgeoisie are basically the upper class; in order for you to be classed as a part of them you must own the means of production such as factories etc. In order for these factories to run, they would need workers, which is where the proletariats come in. The proletariat only owns their labour force which they sell in order for a wage. Karl Marx stated that the proletariats are exploited through low pay and poor work conditions, but due to capitalism, we deal with it as were tied down to the economy.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aware that money or capital also has a large role in the distribution of power, Weber discusses how economic status relates to class. To determine class he used the following three principles: "when (1) a number of people have in common a specific causal component of their life chances, in so far as (2) this component is represented exclusively by economic interests in the possession of goods and opportunities for income, and (3) is represented under the conditions of the commodity or labour markets"(p. 104). Simply put, a person's class is determined by what choices that person or community has in order to sustain comfortable means of living and property is the basic category that Weber believes defines class situation. Class is created through the economic situation of different portions of society, but for Weber, it is an abstraction and can perform no actions of its own; this is where status and party groups come into play.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This ideology has evolved slowly through time and Capitalism was the current species. Although Marx and Engels did not agree with the class rolls and oppression that Capitalism brought with it, they knew it was necessary in order to reach the final goal, Communism. A Capitalistic society brought with it a natural spirit of competition in its markets. This created social “superiors” that forced those lower into a submissive state of mind. The only way a classless society could be reached was through the overthrow of the capitalists (business owners) by the proletariat (working class). Once political power had been seized by the proletariat, a socialist society could be formed that would act almost like a Commonwealth for the proletariat which, in turn, would finally lead to Communism. Erasing all classes would require an astounding change in the traditional way of life. This is why Marx considered the Communist revolution to be “the most radical rupture” seeing as “Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things”. Private property was one of the largest materialistic values held throughout the bourgeoisie class and in Communism, any materialistic value that could separate one man from another on the social ladder had to be removed. Whatever work one was able to input, they were given the same…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominate the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, therefore their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frued vs Marx

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx believes that man is naturally good, but the ownership of property has brought about aggression and selfishness. In other words, over time private property and money have corrupted man. Marx points out that throughout history, classes have existed, but were based on "feudal, patriarchal, and idyllic relations." Tradition and family relations determine a person's class. In the capitalistic society, however, only the ownership of property, the "naked self-interest… cash payment," determines one's class. Marx describes the continuous conflict as an ongoing trend of class struggles. When many take a look at society they notice that with in classes there's always the oppressors and oppressed in continuous hostility towards each other. However, when this phenomenon ends it is normally a rebellious way.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class In America

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe,” said by Frederick Douglass. What is class? Class in today's society can mean anything. Class is something one can have, one can be a part of or one can be limited to. Class as a whole isn't just about where you stand financially but it is where you're placed in society. Class has everything to do with your foundation. This paper talks about the lower, middle and upper class but it also address other issues as to being degraded and discriminated against because of where you stand in civilization.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles," meaning that during and throughout history there is always a constant oppression between the oppressor and oppressed. Each time the fight ends in either a revolutionary reconstruction of society, including a destruction of a particular class.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics