Mass media plays an important role in our lives. Without mass media our lives is useless. Mass media are a pervasive part of our lives (Dominick 2013, pg31). Mass media is a type of way to help us to transfer information and receive information from the peoples. Mass media also can be describe as the extensive phrase describing television, radio, film, newspaper and magazines. For example, New Straits Times is useful and it can help to transfer more information to people who can’t afford to buy a television. This is also considered as a media transfer. On the other hand, we could take the perspective of a sociologist and look through a wide-angle lens to consider the functions performed by the mass media for the entire society that called as macroanalysis (Dominick 2013, pg31). Furthermore, there are few types of function of mass media in society such as surveillance, interpretation, linkage, transmission of values, TV &socialization and last but not list entertainment.
Mass media as “communication—whether written, broadcast, or spoken—that reaches a large audience. This includes television, radio, advertising, movies, the Internet, newspapers, magazines, and so forth.” Mass media is a significant force in modern culture. Sociologists refer to this as a mediated culture where media “reflects and creates the culture”. People are constantly bombarded with messages from a plethora of sources including Television, billboards, movies, and magazines, to name just a few. These forms of media is that they are able to promote not only products, but moods, attitudes, and a sense of what is and is not important, or socially acceptable. This creates an issue when the messages being showcased are negative ones. This relates back to my first research question, as some of the negative messages showcased by the media in regards to body image are what influence, alter, and distort society’s perception of beauty. One of the role that Mass media plays in society is that it makes possible the concept of celebrity: people could not become famous without the way that movies, magazines, and news media are able to reach across the globe on such a grand scale. Cliffnotes states that, In fact, “only political and business leaders, as well as the few notorious outlaws, were famous in the past. Only in recent times have actors, singers, and other social elites become celebrities or ‘stars’”. The current level of media prevalence has not always existed. Back in the 1960s and 1970s, television, for example, consisted of primarily three networks, public broadcasting, and a few local independent stations. The programming of these channels were primarily aimed at two-parent, middle-class families. Despite this, many middle-class households did not even own a television. In contrast, one can find a television in even the poorest of homes, and multiple TVs in the homes of most middle-class families. The availability of televisions has increased significantly, but programming has also diversified, creating shows to aim people of all ages, incomes, backgrounds, interestes, and attitudes. The internet has also increased the role of mass media in more recent days, as nearly all business and companies now make themselves available online. “Although TV and the Internet have dominated the mass media”, the article states, “movies and magazines—particularly those lining the aisles at grocery checkout stands—also play a powerful role in culture, as do other forms of media”. So what role does mass media play in today’s society? Most will agree that mass media is a permanent part of modern culture, and there are three main sociological perspectives on the role of media exist: the limited-effects theory, the class-dominant theory, and the culturalist theory.
With the evolution of digital technology, the role of mass media has been changing at a quick pace. By definition, mass media is any medium used to transmit mass communication i.e. a message created by a...
References: Andersen, Ø. (1995). I retorikkens hage. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Andersen, Ø. (red.) (1999). Dannelse, humanitas, paideia. Oslo: Sypress Forlag.
Armitage, J. (2006). From discourse networks to cultural mathematics. An interview with Friedrich A. Kittler. Theory, Culture & Society vol. 23 (7–8): 17–38.
Bolz, N. (1990). Theorie der neuen Medien. München: Fink Verlag.
Bolz, N. (1991). Eine kurze Geschichte des Scheins. München: Fink Verlag.
Bolz, N. (1993). Am Ende der Gutenberg-Galaxis. Die neuen Kommunikationsverhältnisse. München: Fink Verlag.
Brüning, J., & Knobloch, E. (Hrsg.) (2005). Die mathematischen Wurzeln der Kultur. Mathematische Innovationen und ihre kulturellen Folgen. Schaffhausen: Fink Wilhelm GmbH.
Buckingham, D. (1989). Television literacy: a critique. Radical Philosophy 51: 12–25.
Buckingham, D. (1993). Children talking television: The making of television literacy. London: Falmer.
Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy. What young people need to know bout digital media. Digital Kompetanse, vol. 1, no. 4: 263–276.
Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esposito, E. (1998). Fiktion und Virtualität. In: Krämer, Sybille (ed.) Medien, Computer, Realität. Wirklichkeitsvorstellungen und Neue Medien, pp. 269–296. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Frechette, J.D. (2002). Developing media literacy in cyberspace. Pedagogy and critical learning for the twenty-first-century classroom. Westport, Connecticut, London: Praeger.
Gentikow, B. (2007). Kringkasting. En kulturteknikk i endring Norsk Medie-tidsskrift, 14, nr. 1: 49–70.
Goody, J. & Watt I. ( 1968). The consequences of literacy. In: J. Goody (ed.) Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Havelock, E. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Havelock, E. (1976). The origins of Western society. Toronto: OISE Press.
Havelock, E. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hawisher, G.E. & Selfe C.L. (eds.) (1999). Global literacies and the World-Wide Web. London, New York: Routledge.
Holmes, D. (2005). Communication theory. Media, technology and society. London: Sage Publications.
Innis, H.A, (1950). Empire and communications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johannesen, G. (1987). Rhetorica Norvegica. Oslo: Cappelen.
Kittler, Friedrich ( 1990) Discourse networks 1800/1900. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Kittler, F. ( 1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Krämer, S. (ed.) (1998). Medien, Computer, Realität. Wirklichkeitsvorstellungen und Neue Medien, pp. 9–26. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Krämer, S. (2006). «The cultural techniques of time axis manipulation». Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, 7–8: 93–109.
Krämer, S. & Bredekamp, H. (2003) «Kultur, Technik, Kulturtechnik: Wider die Diskursivierung der Kultur». In: Krämer, Sibylle & Horst Bredekamp (Hrsg.) Bild, Schrift, Zahl, s. 11–22. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, New York: Routledge.
Lämmert, E. (1998) Der Kopf und die Denkmaschinen. In: Krämer, Sybille (ed.)Medien, Computer, Realität. Wirklichkeitsvorstellungen und Neue Medien, pp. 95–118. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
McLuhan, M. ( 1999). Understanding media. The extensions of man. Cambridge, Mass., London: The MIT Press.
Messaris, P. (1994). Visual «literacy»: Image, mind, and reality. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (1998). Multiple media literacies. Journal of Communication: 96–108.
Newhagen, J.E. & Bucy. E.K. (2004). Routes to media access. In: Bucy L.P., P. & E. Newhagen (eds.) Media access. Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use, pp. 3–23. Mahwah, N. J., London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nicolaysen, B. K. (2005). Tilgangskom-petanse: arbeid med tekst som kulturdeltaking. In: Nicolaysen, B.K. & Aase, L. (red.) Kulturmøte i tekster. Litteraturdidaktiske perspektiv. Oslo: Samlaget.
Nicolaysen, B.K. (1991). Bibliografi til historia om lesing i Noreg. Bergen: Universitetet i Bergen, Nordisk Institutt.
Nyre, L. (2004). Mediumteori. Norsk Medietidsskrift, 11, nr. 1: 24–49.
Nyre, L. & M. Ala-Fossi (2007). The better platform. Article, forthcoming.
Olson, D.R. (1994). The world on paper. The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, W.J. ( 1992). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. London, New York: Routledge.
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death. Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking.
Scribner, S. & Cole M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sessa, Adi (2000). Changing minds. Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, Mass., London: The MIT Press.
Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In: Littleton, Karen & Paul Light (eds.) Learning with computers. Analysing productive interactions, pp. 144–161. London: Routledge.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document