Preview

Role Of Kings In Mesopotamia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role Of Kings In Mesopotamia
The role of kings in Mesopotamia was to lead the military forces. The kings would tried to form alliances with other rulers. The role of priest in the Mesopotamian in society was to discover ways to control these societies. Priest guided the king, by giving him information about the gods. Both priest and kings would use manipulation to get cooperation from the Sumerian people. They would put fear into the people by threating to increase taxes and persuasion. They would also use physical forces. (Pg.39) In Egypt the king was in charge of the rise and fall of the Nile. The king was seen as an extension of the gods and “god like”. The king controlled political aspects of Egypt. He controlled the people, crops, resources, and wealth. (Pg.45)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    They both had political and religious power. In Mesopotamia the city's ruler, was thought to be related to a god. In Egypt, the pharaohs were thought to be gods or related to gods. In Egypt, the gods had heads like animals and bodies like humans.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coffin Text From Duat

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The special attention that the kings were given particularly after death made the Egyptians respect them politically as…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kings were given the duties of priests and were given religious roles. The Kings were regarded as intermediaries between the gods and men. They were responsible for making sacrifices to the Gods at times such as before leaving on a campaign, or every month they offered a fully grown animal in sacrifice to Apollo. The kings were also responsible for leading the citizens in their religious celebrations.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Last, in Mesopotamia they had a government based strongly on Theocracy and in Egypt, they had a government based on the Pharaohs. The Mesopotamians thought the gods ruled the land and they were their leaders and in contrast, the Egyptians had Pharaohs who they followed and believed to be their leaders. Ultimately, the floodings of the two large rivers affected every aspect, of both the Mesopotamians and Egyptians way of life. Due to these floodings Mesopotamians and Egyptians formed two very different ways of life. These different views of life caused two different religions to form between Mesopotamia and Egypt. Due to the differences in religions in Mesopotamia and Egypt this caused their way of government, to be much…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia vary drastically in land and geographic features due to its location. They had more differences than similarities which was a cause for the uniquely different cultures of each.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Along with their outlooks being different, so were the structures of their government and cities. The Mesopotamian civilization was organized in a dozen or more different city states, while the Egyptian civilization maintained unity. This being, cities in Egypt were far less important than in Mesopotamia. Each city-state in Mesopotamia was ruled by a different king, that claimed to be that city's patron deity. The Egyptians were ruled by a pharaoh, believed to be a god in human form. This shows that were ruled in very different ways, by very different people. It also shows how different the structure of their cities were.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia Social System

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are some stark differences in the social structure when comparing Mesopotamia and India in the early time of the world, but there were many similarities as well. Religion was very powerful in that time and helped guide the social structure. In Mesopotamia you had a central monarchy that introduced the code of Hammurabi, while India lacking any form of bureaucracy followed a stringent caste system that has evolved and a form of it still used today.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the life of Egypt and Mesopotamia there were similarities and differences. There are comparisons in culture, social class, and gender. Also parallelism in their religions existed however, the differences found, clearly define them as individual entities.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP WORLD

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From 5,000 BCE to 600 BCE, the politics of Mesopotamia shifted from a religiously-led nation, to a secular nation due to the replacement of hunting and gathering for food, with agriculture. In 5,000 BCE, Mesopotamia was settled by the Sumerians, who built the main framework for the Mesopotamian Civilization. Mesopotamia is located between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, which is what made it an excellent place for growing crops. This change in lifestyle sparked the development of the first modern government system. Temples were located in the center of each city. Temples housed the deities who watched over their citizens. Priests made up the most powerful political force in the City. They tended to the shrine and managed the wealth of the deities, to whom citizens were expected to make contributions. By 4,000 BCE, farming had become the main industry of the Nation. Farmers used plows to turn the Earth. Families formed rural farming communities outside the main city. These villages were expected to grow a surplus for the citizens of larger cities. Since urban dwellers had a surplus of time and food, they devoted their days to other trades, such as metallurgy. In 3,000 BCE, the first kings emerged. The king was called “lugal”, meaning “big man.” Unlike Priesthood, the position of lugal was not necessarily hereditary, however, honorable sons were allowed to succeed their fathers. This was probably the origin of the monarchy. The Palace gradually succeed the Temple as the “central office” of the government, and by the end of 3,000 BCE, the Palace ruled over the Temple, supervising all of their religious practices. Many Kings claimed to be gods on Earth, however the more widely accepted version was that they were a representation of gods on Earth. Kings were responsible for overseeing the Temple, maintaining the city walls and defenses, supervising irrigation channels, and protecting the people. Thus, Mesopotamia became a…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What might be the meaning of the animals represented on the Lyre sound box (fig. 2.14a)?…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia Vs Egypt

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mesopotamian society was set up as city-states, where farming villages were connected to an urban are, ruled by a leader living in a palace in the city. This decentralized government is in sharp contrast with the centralized and divine leadership of the Egyptian ruler. The villages in Mesopotamia provided produce, and the urban area provided military protection and specialized goods. There were many city-states in Mesopotamia. The city-states often fought for control of resourses, but they also came together when large man power was needed as in building new irrigation systems. The geography of both Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization helped to develop the religion, the political and economic environment of two great early civilizations. Mesopotamian civilization was comprised of city-states. Their society was divided into landowners, farmers/artisans/and slaves. With the importance of farming, the role of women diminished, since the men did the hard labor of plowing. Women were still allowed to own land at the time. The writing system in Mesopotamia, cuneiform, was controlled by male scribes. This dominance probably led to a further decline in the role of women in Mesopotamian society. Women were allowed to engage in trade, work outside their homes, and make baskets and clean their homes. Politics was off limits.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The root of the differences between the Mesopotamian cultures lies within the politics. The two cultures operated very differently as Mesopotamia was ruled regionally while Egypt used a more centralized government. Kings in the Mesopotamian region formed city states ruled by leaders of their armies while they just oversaw what was going on via these mediums. On the other hand, Egyptian culture featured “god-kings” or pharaohs that controlled much larger expanses of land than Mesopotamian leaders did. Logically, it makes sense that this would occur because of the differences in influence for these two regions. For example, unification of Egypt was inspired by Sudan’s use of small kingdoms that governed the agriculture of the rulers. The Egyptians then faced competition which caused their small kingdoms to conquer neighboring kingdoms to the point where they controlled much larger territories. The notion of kings and pharaohs leads into another difference. Mesopotamian societies featured monarchies as they were led by kings while Egyptians had a theocracy as pharaohs were divine rulers. In Mesopotamia it is figured that their monarchs evolved from men making decisions on behalf of their whole…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like most civilizations of that time, the power of the people was held in the hands of the person in charge of the grain. In both Mesopotamia and Egypt, someone was appointed to be in charge of the grain and other agricultural products, on the other hand, the person in Mesopotamian culture that was in charge of the grain was usually a priest, and in Egypt it was usually an appointed official. City-states made up the Mesopotamian societies, and often neighboring empires invaded each other. Conversely, the Egyptian invaders were mostly from other areas of Africa rather than neighboring people. The reason behind the different types of invasion was due to the way the civilizations were split up. Egypt split in two, lower and upper Egypt, and Mesopotamia did not have definite territories in it, because of the way it was split, it effected where trading was possible. Trade routes accurately illustrate the way both societies interacted with surrounding empires. Both empires traded with the surrounding peoples, however, the Egyptians expanded their trade networks much farther than the Mesopotamians. The two civilizations did however trade with each…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt was a monarchy and Mesopotamia was a democracy. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was in charge of making laws and owned everything, meanwhile, in Mesopotamia, there were many kings in different city-states and they did not own people’s belongings. A difference is that the land was measured differently. In Mesopotamia, they divided the land into city-states. Also, both civilizations thought differently about their kings. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was considered a god. Meanwhile, Mesopotamia believed that the kings weren’t gods so they didn’t worship them as gods. At one point, when the Assyrians were expanding a lot, the city-state got cut up into provinces. The ancient egyptians wrote hieroglyphics about the profits, costs and laws civilians made. In Mesopotamia, the scribes would draw pictograms on clay boards. While Egyptians trusted their justice goddess to teach right from wrong among their citizens, Mesopotamians would follow Hammurabi's law that demanded and Eye for an Eye. With this law, the offended person would be free to do the same thing he suffered at the hands of the criminal. In Mesopotamia would have a voice and a vote for city matters as going to war or not meanwhile Egypt didn’t have a voice. Everything was decided by the Pharaoh. So after all, there are differences and similarities between these dissimilar civilizations that…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mesopotamia there were 4 classes of people. The Kings and Priests were at the top of the class. The Upper Class was the wealthy. The Lower Class was salaried for their work. The slaves were at the foot system. The kings and priests were very influential. The priests controlled the society because they owned most of the land, and a lot of. The Priests were over the schools and the libraries in their temples.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays