Roe Vs Wade Essay
Roe versus Wade originally started in 1970, but Supreme Court ruling was finally made in January of 1973. Norma McCorvey, who goes by Jane Roe for the case, goes against the District Attorney of Dallas County, Henry Wade. Wade is the one who enforced the anti-abortion law in Texas. Roe versus Wade is most famously known as the "abortion case" of the Supreme Court cases, but it also helps protect women's privacy rights. The main focus of this case is to determine if abortion is a right to a woman's privacy or if it is illegal. Norma McCorvey became pregnant for her third time in 1969 when she was only 21 years old. Living with her father in Texas and not making a large enough income to support a child, she felt the need to terminate her pregnancy.
…show more content…
Coffee and Weddington fought on behalf of McCorvey, who went by the name 'Jane Roe' for the case. The three judges in the court agreed that the Texas law that made abortion illegal was unconstitutional based upon the legal aspects of the case and with backing of the 9th amendment. Even though the court came to that agreement, the state of Texas decided against the court and appealed the decision which lead the case to the Supreme …show more content…
Their argument was based on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th, and the 14th amendments. All of which have the common factor of privacy of an American citizen. The 9th and the 14th are the two main arguments during the case. The 9th amendment supports Roe's case because abortion is not clearly stated within the constitution, so the topic is saved for the people to decide. The due process clause of the 14th amendment supports legalizing abortion as well because it states that the state must respect all legal rights that are owned to a person. Coffee and Weddington fought that abortion was a part of a woman's right to privacy, which is a right owned to a person. According to just these two specific amendments, making abortion illegal would be considered unconstitutional. The Supreme Court finally ruled 7-2 in favor of
Coffee and Weddington fought on behalf of McCorvey, who went by the name 'Jane Roe' for the case. The three judges in the court agreed that the Texas law that made abortion illegal was unconstitutional based upon the legal aspects of the case and with backing of the 9th amendment. Even though the court came to that agreement, the state of Texas decided against the court and appealed the decision which lead the case to the Supreme …show more content…
Their argument was based on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th, and the 14th amendments. All of which have the common factor of privacy of an American citizen. The 9th and the 14th are the two main arguments during the case. The 9th amendment supports Roe's case because abortion is not clearly stated within the constitution, so the topic is saved for the people to decide. The due process clause of the 14th amendment supports legalizing abortion as well because it states that the state must respect all legal rights that are owned to a person. Coffee and Weddington fought that abortion was a part of a woman's right to privacy, which is a right owned to a person. According to just these two specific amendments, making abortion illegal would be considered unconstitutional. The Supreme Court finally ruled 7-2 in favor of