Preview

Roderick Chisholm's Solution to “the Problem of the Criterion”

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roderick Chisholm's Solution to “the Problem of the Criterion”
Roderick Chisholm’s Solution to “The Problem of the Criterion” In this paper, I will argue that Roderick Chisholm fails to give an adequate solution to the problem of the criterion. According to Chisholm, the problem of the criterion is the ancient problem of “the wheel” or “vicious circle” (Chisholm, 77). Chisholm explains the problem of the criterion by stating that in order to know whether things are as they seem to be, we must have a procedure for recognizing things that are true from things that are false (Chisholm, 77). He then states that to know if the procedure is a good one, we have to know if it really recognizes things that are true from things that are false, and that we cannot know whether it really does succeed unless we already know what things are true and what things are false (Chisholm, 77). Thus, we are caught in a circle (Chisholm, 77). Chisholm states two questions that he says express some of the philosophical issues that are involved with the problem of the criterion. Question “A” says, “What do we know? What is the extent of our knowledge?” and question “B” says, “How are we to decide whether we know? What are the criteria of knowledge?” (Chisholm, 79). Chisholm considers a skeptical solution for the problem of the criterion and, two non-skeptical solutions for the problem of the criterion (Chisholm, 80). One of the non-skeptical solutions Chisholm considers is “methodism”. According to Chisholm, “methodists” are those who think that they have an answer to question “B” and from that, they can then figure out the answer to question “A” (Chisholm, 80). The other non-skeptical solution Chisholm presents is “particularism”. According to Chisholm, “particularists” are those who think they have an answer to question “A” and from that, they can then figure out the answer to question “B” (Chisholm, 80). Chisholm himself prefers the non-skeptical solution to the problem of the criterion of “particularism” (Chisholm, 81). Chisholm


Bibliography: 1. Chisholm, Roderick (1973). “The Problem of the Criterion.” In Philosophical inquiry, Adler and Elgin (eds). Indianapolis: Hackett 77-85.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The verification principle is a significant concept used by many philosophers in order to determine whether a religious statement is meaningful or not. This was highly influenced by logical positivism: group of 20th century philosophers called the Vienna circle and was then further developed by British philosopher A.J Ayer. Religious language refer to statements such as ‘God exists’ and ‘God loves me’. Whilst these metaphysical claims are often rendered as meaningless by verificationism, one must take into account the strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    16th century German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is often credited as being the first philosopher to posit the principle known as the Identity of Indiscernibles (Loemker 1969: 308). This principle states that if x has exactly the same properties as y, then x is identical to y. An interesting consequence of this principle arises from the implication that no two objects have all of their properties in common; as such an implication suggests that perfect duplicates cannot exist. Perhaps the most famous opponent of the Identity of Indiscernibles is Max Black, who argued against the truth of this principle in his essay “The Identity of Indiscernibles” by postulating a world in which two exactly similar spheres (perfect duplicates) could exist. In this paper, I shall argue against the Identity of Indiscernibles by defending Black’s claim that perfect duplicates can exist. Our discussion will be focused on the argument below.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William K. Clifford sets out to show in “The Ethics of Belief” that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence…” In this paper, I will show that his argument lacks key definitions needed in order to found his inference upon and that it begs the question as to what qualifies as “insufficient” evidence. Furthermore, I will show that the primary issue is not the belief but the results of the belief that is important and that all judgment and interpretation should be based upon said results.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of the paper is to answer several questions arising from an article by H. J. McCloskey entitled “On Being an Atheist”.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    4-Mat Review

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (p. 16). The author points out that regardless of the discipline being discussed, everyone formulates their belief system based on their own particular worldview.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual Project Unit 5

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Solomon, R.C. & Higgins, K.M. (2015). The Big Question: A Short Introduction to Philosophy (9th ed.) [Online version]. Retrieved from AIU Online Virtual Campus. Introduction to Philosophy: PHIL201-1503A-03 website.…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christian Worldview

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Cosgrove, M. (2006). Foundations of Christian thought: Faith, learning and the Christian worldview. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications. Samples, K. (2007). A world of difference: Putting Christian truth-claims to the worldview test. Dartmouth: Baker Books.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immanuel Kant argued that although human knowledge comes from experience, nonetheless knowledge must be grounded in some necessary truths. It is hard to see how the existence of logically and metaphysically necessary truths is enough to ground human knowledge. Following Kant’s reasoning, there are certain types of knowledge we have no access to. I will argue that Presuppositionalism is more plausible than Kant’s skepticism about certain types of knowledge, and that from the Presuppositionalist perspective skepticism is self-refuting. If we don’t assume that God exists, we find that we can’t reach certain conclusions and are left wanting.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hospers' Argument

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hospers challenges the view of a radical sceptic of that there is no knowledge for everything is doubtful by providing vital grounds on how it can ultimately be attained and by adopting the two different senses of knowing, the strong and weak sense. He then fortifies his argument by proving the incoherence of a doubter. This essay will look on his arguments against radical scepticism and finally to what extent it is successful.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sibley, W.M. (1953) “The Rational Versus the Reasonable”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Oct., 1953), pp.554-560, Philosophical Review, Duke University Press.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Fifth Edition. John Perry, Michael Bratman, John Martin Fischer. Oxford University Press. 2010. )…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stages of Faith

    • 4395 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Fowler's theory can be used to understand the development of all religious faiths. Hence his work is not focused on a particular religious tradition or content of belief, but on the `psychological concept of faith (Fowler, 1991:1). Fowler does not concentrate on the contents of faith. He is not suggesting that people change the content of their faith at each stage, but there are differences in styles of faith. This is what Fowler calls the operations of knowing and valuing .…

    • 4395 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his argument, Basinger formulates this epistemic duty with a notion that if a religious exclusivist desires to maximize the truth, avoid or minimize errors, he/she must be under a prima facie obligation to try and resolve any substantial epistemic peer conflict (Williams, 2013). In supporting his stand, Basinger argues that religious exclusivism becomes more practical when individuals consider intra-theistic systems. In his explanation, he gives an example of a disagreement between the Christians on the nature of God’s omnipotence and the nature of the human being freedom that poses a substantial difference with…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain the verification principle and the challenges (consider whether Ayer’s response to the verification principle is sufficient) – Explain the falsification principle and challenges…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays