Preview

Roderick Chisholm's Solution to “the Problem of the Criterion”

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roderick Chisholm's Solution to “the Problem of the Criterion”
Roderick Chisholm’s Solution to “The Problem of the Criterion” In this paper, I will argue that Roderick Chisholm fails to give an adequate solution to the problem of the criterion. According to Chisholm, the problem of the criterion is the ancient problem of “the wheel” or “vicious circle” (Chisholm, 77). Chisholm explains the problem of the criterion by stating that in order to know whether things are as they seem to be, we must have a procedure for recognizing things that are true from things that are false (Chisholm, 77). He then states that to know if the procedure is a good one, we have to know if it really recognizes things that are true from things that are false, and that we cannot know whether it really does succeed unless we already know what things are true and what things are false (Chisholm, 77). Thus, we are caught in a circle (Chisholm, 77). Chisholm states two questions that he says express some of the philosophical issues that are involved with the problem of the criterion. Question “A” says, “What do we know? What is the extent of our knowledge?” and question “B” says, “How are we to decide whether we know? What are the criteria of knowledge?” (Chisholm, 79). Chisholm considers a skeptical solution for the problem of the criterion and, two non-skeptical solutions for the problem of the criterion (Chisholm, 80). One of the non-skeptical solutions Chisholm considers is “methodism”. According to Chisholm, “methodists” are those who think that they have an answer to question “B” and from that, they can then figure out the answer to question “A” (Chisholm, 80). The other non-skeptical solution Chisholm presents is “particularism”. According to Chisholm, “particularists” are those who think they have an answer to question “A” and from that, they can then figure out the answer to question “B” (Chisholm, 80). Chisholm himself prefers the non-skeptical solution to the problem of the criterion of “particularism” (Chisholm, 81). Chisholm


Bibliography: 1. Chisholm, Roderick (1973). “The Problem of the Criterion.” In Philosophical inquiry, Adler and Elgin (eds). Indianapolis: Hackett 77-85.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    THEO 201 Quiz1 Study Guide

    • 2424 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3) The test of priority of data – constructing a systematic theology is to discriminate between what is…

    • 2424 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gooch, John, and Dorothy U. Seyler. Argument! 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * P. 10 What are the kinds of issues that raise epistemological concerns? HOW WE ACQUIRE OUR BELIEFS, WHAT WE BELIEVE IS TRUE, WHETHER WE BELIEVE RATIONALLY, WHETHER WE OUGHT TO RECONSIDER BELIEFS THAT HAVE BEEN CRITICIZED---HOW TO TREAT CLAIMS PURPOSED FOR OUR ACCEPTANCE, HOW TO HANDLE IDEAS OPPOSITE OF OUR OWN BELIEFS---…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    16th century German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is often credited as being the first philosopher to posit the principle known as the Identity of Indiscernibles (Loemker 1969: 308). This principle states that if x has exactly the same properties as y, then x is identical to y. An interesting consequence of this principle arises from the implication that no two objects have all of their properties in common; as such an implication suggests that perfect duplicates cannot exist. Perhaps the most famous opponent of the Identity of Indiscernibles is Max Black, who argued against the truth of this principle in his essay “The Identity of Indiscernibles” by postulating a world in which two exactly similar spheres (perfect duplicates) could exist. In this paper, I shall argue against the Identity of Indiscernibles by defending Black’s claim that perfect duplicates can exist. Our discussion will be focused on the argument below.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The verification principle is a significant concept used by many philosophers in order to determine whether a religious statement is meaningful or not. This was highly influenced by logical positivism: group of 20th century philosophers called the Vienna circle and was then further developed by British philosopher A.J Ayer. Religious language refer to statements such as ‘God exists’ and ‘God loves me’. Whilst these metaphysical claims are often rendered as meaningless by verificationism, one must take into account the strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages

    Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (1) philosophy can prove by means of reason unaided by revelation some truths proposed by Christian faith;…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sibley, W.M. (1953) “The Rational Versus the Reasonable”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Oct., 1953), pp.554-560, Philosophical Review, Duke University Press.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assimilating to the Us

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Crusius, Timothy W., and Carolyn E. Channell. The Aims of Argument. 6thth ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Print.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Fifth Edition. John Perry, Michael Bratman, John Martin Fischer. Oxford University Press. 2010. )…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I will then move onto discuss various theologians that oppose the ontological argument and critique their responses. The aim of the essay if to show the strength of the argument and to expose some key weaknesses with its criticisms. Hopefully the essay will be convincing enough for the reader to not accept the words from Scott Aikin that the ontological argument is merely “the litmus test for intellectual seriousness”.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christian Worldview

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Cosgrove, M. (2006). Foundations of Christian thought: Faith, learning and the Christian worldview. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications. Samples, K. (2007). A world of difference: Putting Christian truth-claims to the worldview test. Dartmouth: Baker Books.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of the paper is to answer several questions arising from an article by H. J. McCloskey entitled “On Being an Atheist”.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For instance, David Hume was an agnostic philosopher who approved the skeptical observation that we do not know enough to proclaim or reject the existence of God (as cited in Soccio, 2013, p. 296). Another theory, Thomas Aquinas is a philosopher that has a theory of five ways to demonstrate God’s existence for natural reasons; these are the argument from motion, the cosmological argument, argument from necessity, the argument from gradation, and the teleological argument (Soccio, 2013, p. 230). “The argument from motion explains that motion must be given to each object by some other object that is already moving. The cosmological argument clarifies that there is a cause for everything created in this world. The argument from necessity is based on the idea that nothing had ever occurred, nothing will continually occur, hence to some degree the existence of supernatural being is necessary. The argument from gradation creates the idea that the existence of god grows from having more being than a nonliving thing. Teleological argument believes that the universe displays order and resolution that can only be the outcome of a God” (as cited in Soccio, 2013, p. 232-236). Thomas Aquinas is an example to show that with his multiple ways of proving God existence can increase many people wanting answers. The way that no theories has completely demonstrated the presence of God indicates the proposal of this paper that people do not need evidence for the existence of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays