Robust Knowledge

The definition of the word ‘Robust’ is wealthy or powerful built. Robust Knowledge is Knowledge that is relevant and accepted by actors in the context of its application. Robust knowledge requires both consensus and disagreement because it is a knowledge that is powerfully built, a powerfully built knowledge because consensus refers to collective opinion and disagreement refers to lack of approval. Although it does require consensus and disagreement, in some fields it is not necessary. Mathematics could be an area of knowledge that could explain why this claim is not accurate. Arts could be used as an area of knowledge, the arts could explain why this claim is justifiable. A good way of knowing that helps supports mathematics is reason, reason
Robust knowledge is the application of something that is known from a person’s experiment on a certain subject matter. Something can be robust if it can be explained and justified. Robust is the value that is placed on the knowledge that is brought from past experiment. I believe that the arts support this claim because if there was no disagreement and agreement in the arts, it would be boring instead of being spontaneous and different. The arts would not be the same if there would be different or the same perspective, it would not be art because everybody has a different point of view. That is what makes the arts Robust, it is required to create a powerful knowledge. Romeo and Juliet, a tragedy written by Shakespeare, some may say that it was the best love story ever told, some may say that it was not wise and that it does
In the painting Guernica by Pablo Picasso, Picasso painted that piece for one reason. The painting described all of the civilians pain during the bombing, all of the sadness and pain that was constructed because of the bombing. Not only did the painting express the event, but it also expressed how Picasso felt about the bombing. The painting only had one meaning, so other may say disagree in the arts field that robust knowledge does require consensus and disagreement. The painting only had one meaning, it was Picasso’s own opinion and emotions that explained what the painting meant. That means that others may disagree with this claim and argue that robust knowledge does not require consensus and disagreement because it should not require different perspectives, it should only require the perspective of the person that created the