Preview

Robespierre: Hero or Villain?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robespierre: Hero or Villain?
Maximilien Robespierre has always been known to be controversial and misunderstood. He was the face of the French Revolution. In accordance with the Jacobins, they controlled the time known as the Reign of Terror, due to their influence in the accumulation of murders of those opposed to the revolution. Reign of Terror was a symbolic time period within the French Revolution that involved corruption of power and influence and mass executions. With Robespierre at the forefront, he became one of the most important men in the Revolution. As soon as Maximilien Robespierre decided to react to enemies of the revolutions, mass execution being his choice of force; his implementation of the Reign of Terror was a villainous act striking those who spoke out as traitors with the belief that those people were sinners and were to be killed for the betterment of humanity.

From the time Robespierre became active and prominent in the National Assembly and the Parisian Jacobin Club, he was never considered much more than an average man; he was not regarded as one to sport the face of the Reign of Terror. With a pale complexion, cat-like facial features and glasses that seemingly never stayed on his nose, he embodied that of a man in the Old Regime (Palmer 6-7). He was described as a talker, not a doer. His rhetoric was excellent; however, is delivery was confusing. He was shy and his voice did carry well. His attributes as a shy and nervous man did not suggest he would take over and lead the Committee of Public safety, serving alongside the ruthless Jacobins.

On the contrary, Robespierre took a firm stand in his beliefs. Individual liberties were very important. He had good morals; he believed that money and birth should dictate how one is valued in society. He defended democracy. He strived to defend the Revolution and wanted "liberation of all of the oppressed-actors, Jewish, Negro slaves in the colonies" (Soboul 55). He continues to go on by stating,

The Republic must guarantee



Citations: Jordan, David P. _The Journal of Modern History_. 2nd ed. Vol. 49. U of Chicago, 0. 282- 291. Print. McLetchie, Scott. "Maximilien Robespierre, Master of the Terror." _Maximilien_ _Robespierre, Master of the Terror_. Loyola University of New Orleans, 1 Jan. 1984. Web. 24 Sept. 2014. Mirabeau, quoted in Jean Matrat, _Robespierre, or the Tyranny of the_ _Majority,_ trans. Alan Kendall (New York: Charles Scribner 's Sons, 1971), p. 51. R. R. Palmer, _Twelve Who Ruled: The Year of Terror in the French_ _Revolution_ (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1941), pp. 3-21. Soboul, A. _Robespierre and the Popular Movement of 1793-1794_. Vol. 5. Oxford University Press, 0. 54-70. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Robespierre’s idea of virtue and terror is somewhat contradicting. In Justification of the Use of Terror we see that Robespierre starts off by stating that the French people have gone through many obstacles to set up a new government. At some point the new government has to be put in place. According to Robespierre the new government’s principles should come from the spirit of the revolution. The new government should also realize that the new system will encounter some jeopardizing.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a moment in french history that began in 1793 and ended a year later in 1794. The Reign of Terror was just like how its name sounded; terrifying. Robespierre began the reign of terror the moment the french king, Louis XIV, was guillotined. He claimed that the only way to go through with the french revolution was to rid France of all their enemies and potential threats by beheading them at the guillotine. People may wonder if the Reign of Terror was even justifiable, stating that the French Revolution would have gone through successfully without it, but in all actuality the Reign of Terror was justified by France’s internal and external conflicts along with newer humane methods of ending people’s lives.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ideals of the French Revolution were "Equality, Liberty, and Fraternity," but the methods that were used to fulfill these goals were complicated. During the Reign of Terror, about 40,000 people were guillotined because of Maximilien Robespierre. He thought that “Liberty could not be secured unless criminals lose their heads”. Napoleon Bonaparte, a Revolutionary hero, seized control of the government in France in 1799, he was looking to bring peace to the French people by ending the Revolution. For this to be done, he had to be in complete control like a monarch or a dictator. However, the French people still wanted to have some of the privileges they had during the Revolution. Napoleon Bonaparte stabilized and united French society, yet supported the ideals of French Revolution.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Primary Analysis

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    [ 3 ]. Duiker, William .and Spielvogel, Jackson. The Essential World History. Sixth Edition. (United States 2011), 346…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The promises of the Declaration of the Rights of Man were forgotten. Terror was the order of the day. In the words of Maximilien Robespierre, "Softness to traitors will destroy us all" (“History Wiz”). He promoted violence and used his power to force the others in following him by means of fear. The old saying “the end justifies the means” could easily be applied to Robespierre’s theories. Even though his reasoning’s seem irrational, immoral, and unfair he truly believed it would solve France’s problems. In a speech to the National Convention Robespierre further explained how terror would lead to a republic of virtue. “If the spring of popular government in time of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror: virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless.”…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    to be specific Robespierre wanted to protect the Revolution because he was the main figure of the French Revolution.Also,he supported the Revolution because he didn`t wanted the slavery ends.But,though the time his voice itself was weak and did not carry well outside or in large halls.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reign of Terror started with the onset of the French Revolution, and during this period of time anyone thought to be an enemy of the revolution was executed. Document 6 shows a picture of a public execution occurring with thousands of people watching. The primary method of execution was by guillotine and during the Reign of Terror this gruesome contraption took the lives of over 16,000 people over the course of 9 months. The Reign of Terror finally ended with the execution of Robespierre in 1794. When Napoleon seized power in 1799, many citizens saw it as a good thing. They believed France needed a strong leader, and Napoleon filled that description well. Napoleon believed that “To have good soldiers, a nation must always be at war.” (Document 8). He was a very strong military leader, and he always looked to achieve more military conquests. He won lots of crucial battles for France and was remembered as a great war…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre states, “What is the goal toward which we are heading? The peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality.” (Bienvenu, p. 1, para.1) The laws that have been passed by the royalty that are meant to bring long lasting righteousness, are laws that are recognized; these laws are not written any where but in the essence of all individuals. Robespierre was elected as the representative of the National Convention and joined a political club called the radical Jacobin party. Being apart of the Convention and the Jacobins, Robespierre took over the administrative power of the Republic. Because the Jacobins believed that France was in need of change and restructuring, and Robespierre was now the head of the Convention, he can develop such change. By doing so he argues that in the land, the use of ethics must be replaced with the use of pride, proposition for traditions, self-regard for arrogance, magnificence for narcissism, prestige for money, and immorality of the sovereign for virtues and the phenomenon. He believed in democracy and the Republic of virtue. He felt that in order to set the basis of democracy within the people, the merge of both ending the war of independence and oppression must take place in order to put an end to the revolt. The essences of the Republic are virtue and equality. He explains how it is the development of virtue and the maintenance of equality that creates the Republic. Therefore, it is embraced or founded by an individual. He believed that the quality of being an admired government would be an advantage in gaining the trust of the citizens in order to create a strict and rigorous government, “…be trustful towards the people and severe towards itself.” (Bienvenu, p. 2, para. 2) Robespierre states the strengths and weaknesses of this theory: the strength being the triumph of truth rather than dishonesty, and the rights of the community’s interests than the private. The purpose…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The radical leader of the Committee of Public Safety, Robespierre had fanatic and opinionated ideas and beliefs that made him a passionate leader. He believes that to safely go through the stormy revolution, the people's behavior should be regulated by stormy circumstances, and their plans should be based on the combination of the spirit of revolutionary government and democracy. Virtue, the "fundamental principle of the democratic government," was a strong factor of his viewpoint. He thinks that if there is no virtue in the government, then the people's virtue can be a source, but when the people are corrupted too, there is no chance of winning liberty. These ideas did no harm; they were beneficial and very true.…

    • 366 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre was a man with humble beginnings. Growing up in Arras, a small town in Northern France, Robespierre developed into the strong and prominent figure he grew up to be. Robespierre’s parents were not in the picture for the large majority of his rise to power. His father was a lawyer and his occupation influenced Robespierre to head down the same career path; Robespierre moved to Paris and received a degree in law from Lycée Louis-le-Grand. His rise to political success began with his consistent bashing of the standing French Monarchy in addition to his ability to fight for the common man in France which made up the Third Estate. Robespierre, once a man of the people became a man against the people toward the end of his life.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial leader at the time of the Reign of Terror was Maximilien Robespierre however incite of the conflict between rival political factions the advocacies were the Girondins and the Jacobin’s. As the Jacobin’s gained control of the committee of public safety and Robespierre made his entrance quickly become the most influential member of the committee as it moved to take radical measures against the revolutions domestic and foreign enemies.…

    • 4973 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Robespierre and the Terror” by Marisa Linton, Maximilien Robespierre is foremost depicted as a heartless monster that terrorized the people of France during the 1790’s. The article states facts about Robespierre starting with his birth in 1758, his “Reign of Terror” and ultimately ends with his death by beheading. Though Robespierre was an active revolutionary that represent common people, his radical ideas and hofficic actions inevitably scarred France’s history so he will forever be an infamous figure. Towards the end of the article, however, Linton sheds light on the idea that one person, by themselves, is not capable of this destruction; rather the people in their entirety are to blame. Instead of accepting the anarchy they…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre once said, “The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant.” This quote means that the government upholds their power by keeping the people uneducated and suppressing their freedom. Maximilien Robespierre was a lawyer and a politician who strongly disagreed with the French government. He was an essential figure of the French Revolution that had an immense impact on the French government. Robespierre led France during the reign of terror and soon became suspicious of many revolutionists, consequently leading to his downfall.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Committee of Public safety formed to protect the newly formed republic from outside attacks and internal conflicts. Maximilien Robespierre, the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, introduced new legislation and expressed his ideals in a series of speeches. These speeches touched on the nature of public virtue and theory of revolutionary government. Robespierre differentiated a revolutionary government from a constitutional government, saying, “It has nothing in common with arbitrary rule; it is public interest that governs it and not the whims of private individuals” (Hanson 170). From this statement, it is clear that Robespierre’s revolutionary view focused on the importance of public interest instead of solely influential members who make up the first and second estates. The constitution of 1793 motivated the efforts of the committee as they worked to stabilize the economy. Individual freedoms and social equality would flourish under these principles, but Robespierre’s power went to his head. Paranoid that counterrevolutionary traitors would interfere with the government, Robespierre launched the Reign of Terror. The Terror served as an emergency form of government that was meant to scare the citizens into conforming to Robespierre’s ideals. Robespierre’s republic of virtue quickly diminished as men lost the majority of their rights. Because Robespierre executed anyone who expressed an opinion that lead him to believe they were a traitor, the citizens lacked freedom of speech, their opinions, and even their property. All progress towards individual freedom and equality the French government made since overthrowing the monarchy was essentially reversed. Filled with paranoia and fear caused by the Terror, the people wanted to eliminate Robespierre because he had grown to become almost dictator-like. Once the economy stabilized, Robespierre no longer had a purpose,…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacobin leaders (including Robespierre and St. Just) were elected by the National Convention to oversee the Committee of Public Safety – a committee designed to implicate and eradicate internal and external threats to the French state during the Revolution. They were able to maintain political power over this institution until the summer of 1794 by way of fear and intimidation. They were complicit in repeatedly and violently eradicating the Convention of individuals deemed and implicated as disloyal to the Republic. This ended with widespread executions. This time period was called the Reign of Terror (5 September 1793 – 28 July 1794), and occurred in their last months of power. Robespierre was the spokesman for the successful faction, and was held in high regard for his reputation as "the Incorruptible" – an individual whose personal virtue seemingly appeared as unshakable in the face of great adversity and challenges. He framed the newfound Republic as the ‘Republic of Virtue’, until the Jacobins' final purge ended on July 27, 1794. There is some uncertainty and speculations that a soldier shot Robespierre after storming the Parisian city hall known as the Hôtel de Ville the night before his execution, and some historians also argue that he attempted suicide. In any…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays