“Thus a public can only attain enlightenment slowly. Perhaps a revolution can overthrow autocratic despotism and profiteering or power-grabbing oppression, but it can never truly reform a manner of thinking; instead, new prejudices, just like the old ones they replace, will serve as a leash for the great unthinking mass” (36). Kant prophesied that enlightenment will cause waves in bourgeoisie class, and it was possible through revolutions and changes that the world went over. As an illustration, a great example of the transformation could be shown from the changes of political view in France. That is, when revolution was sparked by the fierce passions of Frenchmen and issued statement of rights, demanding equality and freedom, among others. King Louis XVI was viewed as villain through the eyes of the revolutionary, where he governed France through monarchy. His rich in the palace of Versailles were seen as tyranny, and his credibility worsened as the people of French starved from scarcity. “the kernel gradually reacts on a people’s mentality, and it finally even influences the principles of government, which finds that it can profit by treating men, who are now more than machines, in accord with their dignity” (42). As Kant’s prediction, the First French Republic was formed and aimed for a better government and the desire for equality. They…
1794 Maximilian Robespierre was experiencing the negative repercussions of his creation. The French revolution changed the order of society and it came with a price. Prince Louis the 14th grandson Louis Capet married at age of 15 years old. The prince lacked of experience and social skills and leadership. The wedding was a political union between Austria and France. Marie Antoniette was 14 years old and was not interested in politics. Four years after the wedding Prince Louis the 14th dies leaving the throne to Prince Louis the 16th. He was not ready for the responsibility; he was only 20 years old.…
The two documents “Thomas Jefferson on the French Revolution,” and “A Positive American View,” are both written by American public figures, who are both in support of the revolutionary cause in France. In these documents they both express their views on the progress and steps taken by the people of France in general during this time. They raise interest in the reign of terror and what the monarch’s role should be in the future France.…
Lastly , the introduction to the proposal of a ‘Republic of virtues;angered many people.First, the Republic of virtue angered many people when Robespierre introduc it.that is to say ,the idea of the ‘Republic of virtus’ association with the de-christianization of France during the French Revolution;where the Christianicimos process involved the closing of churches,and the selling of many churches. These were the causes that provoked a…
My two historians are Tocqueville and Blanc. They both describe the revolution in very different and interesting ways. Though they both has both believed that the french revolution was split up onto two parts. For Tocqueville, he firmly thought the first part was about liberty, which he found to be ‘beautiful’. That the citizens of France worked together for the right to liberty and to get rid of the Feudal regime or Accien regime. Take for example, a country priest a man that has an estate and who is not put down by the seigneurs felt compelled to offer and seek help out for what he called ‘the wretched’ or poor. Instead of taking the side that a man of his position should be on, he stand for the people that he cares and watch over. As said by Tocqueville, 1789 democrat was the…
Tocqueville pursued his evaluation amidst a shift in French government from an aristocracy toward a more democratized nation. During his work within the courts of Versailles, Tocqueville developed a sense of strong liberalism as he knew that the aristocracy was bound to vanish. The shifting form of France’s government precipitated into a revolution, and Tocqueville saw a great opportunity and responsibility to analyze what lessons other democracies had learned so he could be part of leading France and other nations into governments that were modeled from the strengths of democracy while avoiding the weaknesses.…
Inspired by the achievement of the American Revolution, the people of France decided to protest against the unjust monarchy and have a revolution of their own. France needed a change in leadership, and a shift in power in order for this revolution to be a success .Unfortunately, for the people to get what they needed from the government, they took drastic and disturbing measures to make their voices heard. Through this France not only left an impact on themselves, but influenced other nations in need of change in their governments.…
He enumerates several conditions by which the government could be remedied including the following: the decentralization of government; the decentralization of the administration; the creation of non-political associations; and the imposition of religion. Only then “a legislative power could be so constituted as to represent the majority without necessarily being the slave of its passions, an executive so as to retain a proper share of authority, and a judiciary so as to remain independent of the other two powers, a government would be formed which would still be democratic while incurring scarcely any risk of tyranny” Unlike Rousseau, Tocqueville has the advantage of having working with more than just a theoretical model of a society and, as such, his understanding of how realistically the majority rule could function differs significantly. He perceives the majority rule of the legislature less as a route for achieving the common good, but rather as a threat of tyranny both political and social; furthermore, and the solutions he offers to this condition are not only far more complex but would require an entire social…
The ideals of the French Revolution were "Equality, Liberty, and Fraternity," but the methods that were used to fulfill these goals were complicated. During the Reign of Terror, about 40,000 people were guillotined because of Maximilien Robespierre. He thought that Liberty could not be secured unless criminals lose their heads. Napoleon Bonaparte, a Revolutionary hero, seized control of the government in France in 1799, he was looking to bring peace to the French people by ending the Revolution. For this to be done, he had to be in complete control like a monarch or a dictator. However, the French people still wanted to have some of the privileges they had during the Revolution. Napoleon Bonaparte stabilized and united French society, yet supported the ideals of French Revolution.…
The French Revolution contained an abundance of violence and radical ideas; however, in spite of this, a progressive slogan diminished these oppressive acts. “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” is a reformist idea that was a foundation for French society. The idea of liberty is apparent in various aspects during the French…
Napoleon’s personal greed for power drove him to infringe the basic principles of the revolution on the rights to hereditary and absolute rule. Robespierre, an enlightened leader of the Jacobins, stated that the purpose of the French Revolution was to abolish absolute monarchy and institute a “democratic or republican government” that could help increase political equality within a nation (Robespierre). However, Napoleon rejected any republican form of government; he was solely concerned with maintaining a “hereditary power, which… may endure for generations, even for centuries” (Selected). Ironically though, in hopes to gain popularity among members of the 3rd estate, he abolished the power of the nobility and appointed governors that were loyal to the central government. Not only did he crown himself emperor of France, but also, “he established an imperial court and the members of his family were made royalty, while other titles and honors were given to his…
1793 to 1794 is when the Reign of Terror began and end. The Reign of Terror was about 2 years from when Louis XVI was beheaded and around the time 20,000 people were guillotined. 35,000 people were killed by officers and officials. The Reign of Terror was not justified.The claim stated can be supported by these 3 reasons: they were threatened in wrong ways for the wrong things , the methods used were not necessary, and the reasoning they gave did not match the actions.…
At first, Robespierre wasn’t that bad of a guy. Supporting the abolition of slavery and opposing the death penalty, he was an eloquent lawyer who just happened to have the bad luck to be born into Revolutionary France. His rise and fall from power can be analyzed in any number of ways, but what I am most curious about is what exactly caused the shift in Robespierre’s mental and emotional state which resulted in the brutal execution of 40,000 of his own citizens. Could he sense the shift? Was he helpless to stop his changing attitudes, so hypnotized by the lure of power that he was willing to do anything to keep it? Or did he know what was taking place, the horrors that he was committing, and did he continue to commit them for his own pleasure? Since he is not alive, killed by the very reign of terror he conceived, I think about it.…
The Enlightenment of the eighteenth century inspired revolutionary ideas in France in the 1790s. During the French Revolution time, the rulers of the revolution, the bourgeois, promoted liberal, enlightened ideas like equality before the law and religious freedom. With the idea of natural rights for a couple years, feminists such as Mary Wollstonecraft and Olympe de Gouges began to stand up for women's right. However it was felt that the bourgeois were not capable enough to survive in a free society. Throughout the revolution liberalism and nationalism were growing and the people were becoming known as highest citizens in politics. The ideas and objectives of the people during the French Revolution changed throughout its Declaration of the Rights of Women, National Convention and the National Assembly.…
From early in his life, Robespierre apposed violence. While he worked as a judge in rural France, Robespierre was upset when his job made him sentence a convicted killer to death. He quit his position as judge because of this. Even in the early stages of the revolution Robespierre was pleased that the revolt in which he participated had been able to be successful without the evil of bloodshed. One can only conjecture what caused him to change from the peace loving rational of the early phases of the revolution into the bloodthirsty tyrant who history remembers. Many see his transformation stemming from his further inquiry into Rousseau's politics. The usually nonviolent Rousseau does advocate execution of any who claim to believe in the "Supreme Being" but act as an unbeliever. This stance of Rousseau explains Robespierre's increased vigilence of executing his enemies after his May 7, 1794 proposal that the government recognize the existence of a Supreme Being and that the state adopt an official religion called the Cult of the Supreme Being. But what first compelled this usually calm nonviolent man to begin the practice of taking lives in the name of the state?…