Risk Of Injury In Hockey Essay
In sports, liability is a serious risk. The problem is that one cannot predict an injury, however, it could have been easily prevented if the situation did not entirely take place. In this situation, an ice hockey coach was not present when one of his hockey players who gotten injured, therefore, for the cause of his injury was directly taken into a hospital. Considering that the coach was in the lobby at the time of the event, however, the coach cannot be found liable, since he is a volunteer who is unpaid and the nature of the sport of hockey could nevertheless result in injury. As a coach, it is his duty to protect his players from unreasonable risk of injury and having the standard of care in where a situation causes a player to suffer
…show more content…
With the intention to race without helmets, therefore, causes the severe risk of injury. As employees, they must follow their duty to understand the safety and risks involved with this sport. According to Law for recreation & sport managers, discusses employees/service personnel by stating that, “If the employee has a duty, breaches that duty by failing to meet the required standard of care, and that breach is proximate cause of injury to the plaintiff, the employee is negligent and may be legally liable” (Cotten & Wolohan, p. 53). Despite each employee being negligent, they will still all become held individually liable for not acknowledging the complete risks that could lead to injury or harm from their actions associated with it. Although, this situation only involved the coach and three rink employees, however, the rink owner is not liable. With this situation, the owner should become aware of an event such as this could happen, however, the accident was not justified, since this situation involved not knowing the risks rather than a problem with the rink itself. For example, in the Pinero vs. City of New York case, a student was assaulted while on his way home from school approximately 15 minutes after school had ended when they got into a “verbal alternation and subsequent physical altercation with an unknown
With the intention to race without helmets, therefore, causes the severe risk of injury. As employees, they must follow their duty to understand the safety and risks involved with this sport. According to Law for recreation & sport managers, discusses employees/service personnel by stating that, “If the employee has a duty, breaches that duty by failing to meet the required standard of care, and that breach is proximate cause of injury to the plaintiff, the employee is negligent and may be legally liable” (Cotten & Wolohan, p. 53). Despite each employee being negligent, they will still all become held individually liable for not acknowledging the complete risks that could lead to injury or harm from their actions associated with it. Although, this situation only involved the coach and three rink employees, however, the rink owner is not liable. With this situation, the owner should become aware of an event such as this could happen, however, the accident was not justified, since this situation involved not knowing the risks rather than a problem with the rink itself. For example, in the Pinero vs. City of New York case, a student was assaulted while on his way home from school approximately 15 minutes after school had ended when they got into a “verbal alternation and subsequent physical altercation with an unknown