Riordan Manufacturing Executive Report
Riordan Manufacturing Executive Report
Warren Buffet once said, “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” With a company that has over five hundred employees, four locations worldwide, and $50 million in annual sales, placing the value on the organization is simple; look at the bottom line and see the profit. This is the situation at Riordan Manufacturing where the price it paid to do business was less than what it made, defining a clear value in what Riordan provides. Riordan’s Sales and Marketing department has a clear value; $50 million is sales to show of it. But how do we show the value for other departments within the organization such as Information Systems (IS) and Information Technology (IT) solutions? While the IS and IT costs and what Riordan pays for it are clear from looking at the financials, the value is not. This brings us to the question of what value does Riordan Manufacturing get out of its IS services and IT department.
This question is the problem that Riordan Manufacturing has had for many years. Recently, Riordan executive management hired a new Chief Information Officer (CIO) to improve its infrastructure and to answer this question. While management wants to use more IS and IT solutions throughout the organization, it has had trouble finding the perfect fit in all aspects of its operations. Even though IS and IT costs have risen, the puzzle pieces still have not come together; the value and benefit has not been clear to the company. As we will see throughout this review, it is time to focus and find the value that technology and information brings to the organization. It is time to find the efficiencies and savings that the company needs to clearly see the value. With Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Customer Relationship Management (CRM), or Supply Chain Management (SCM) systems, there has got to be value in the way they are used. There has also got to be value in using outside services such as Application
Warren Buffet once said, “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” With a company that has over five hundred employees, four locations worldwide, and $50 million in annual sales, placing the value on the organization is simple; look at the bottom line and see the profit. This is the situation at Riordan Manufacturing where the price it paid to do business was less than what it made, defining a clear value in what Riordan provides. Riordan’s Sales and Marketing department has a clear value; $50 million is sales to show of it. But how do we show the value for other departments within the organization such as Information Systems (IS) and Information Technology (IT) solutions? While the IS and IT costs and what Riordan pays for it are clear from looking at the financials, the value is not. This brings us to the question of what value does Riordan Manufacturing get out of its IS services and IT department.
This question is the problem that Riordan Manufacturing has had for many years. Recently, Riordan executive management hired a new Chief Information Officer (CIO) to improve its infrastructure and to answer this question. While management wants to use more IS and IT solutions throughout the organization, it has had trouble finding the perfect fit in all aspects of its operations. Even though IS and IT costs have risen, the puzzle pieces still have not come together; the value and benefit has not been clear to the company. As we will see throughout this review, it is time to focus and find the value that technology and information brings to the organization. It is time to find the efficiencies and savings that the company needs to clearly see the value. With Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Customer Relationship Management (CRM), or Supply Chain Management (SCM) systems, there has got to be value in the way they are used. There has also got to be value in using outside services such as Application
References: Ambuhl, C., & Bitterman, M. (2004). IT Benchmarking: A Baseline for improving performance. Retrieved from http://www.rfgonline.com/events/highperformance.pdf Baihaqi (2009) Baltzan, P., & Phillips, A. (2010). Business Driven Technology (4th ed.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Demand Media Inc. (2012). What are the cons of ERP? Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/list_6591648_cons-erp_.html Gartner Research Janstal[v1] , S. (1999) Enterprise Resource Planning: Integrating Applications and Business Processes Across the Enterprise. Retrieved from http://www.dpu.se/CTR/ctrerp_e.html. Morello, D. (2003). The Organizational Implications of Offshore Outsourcing. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/resources/118100/118136/the_organizational_implicati_118136.pdf Pearlson, K.E., & Saunders, C.E Rose India Tecnologies Pvt.Ltd. (2011). Outsourcing Services – Outsourcing Company in India. Retrieved from http://www.roseindia.net/services/outsourcing/index.shtml Sans Institute (2006) Subramanian, M. & Williams, R. (2007). Outsourcing Models: Aligning Source Strategy to Business Objectives retrieved from http://www.infosys.com/global-sourcing/white-papers/Documents/aligning-sourcing-strategy.pdf Sumner, M UMaine. (2009). Enterprise Systems: SCM, CRM, & ERP. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/mgraham213/enterprise-systems-scm-crm-erp University of Phoenix Wailgum, T. (2008). Supply chain management definition and solutions. Retrieved from http://www.cio.com/article/40940/Supply_Chain_Management_Definition_and_Solutions#scm_abc Yarmoff, L