Preview

Right to Counsel

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Counsel
THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL

The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).
In the early founding of this country, the colonies used common law brought over from England which prevented serious offenders from obtaining counsel even at their own expense (Right to Counsel Clause). Some attorneys, out of the kindness of their heart and others for self-serving purposes, would lend their services freely and other times the public would pay. This pattern continued until the Revolutionary war at which time the practice of hiring one’s own representation was well practiced. The right of counsel was secured in the Sixth Amendment.
The Sixth Amendment gave the right to counsel but only people who could afford an attorney could hire one. Thus, a large population of people was left to defend themselves at a great disadvantage for many of them were uneducated or had other issues that prevented them from getting a fair trial. The first major incremental case to impact the right to counsel was Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). In Powell, the court recognized that poor and illiterates were not receiving a



References: Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972). Kanovitz, J.R. (2010). Constitutional law (12thed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938). Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). Right to Counsel Clause(2010). Revolutionary War and Beyond. Accessed on 21 February 2012 at http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/right-to- counsel-clause.html United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When suspects are facing trial they can defend themselves, hire an attorney, or have one appointed by the state. Having a lawyer can help because they have training in defending their clients. This right also protects the poor suspects who can not afford a lawyer to represent them. The people that can not afford one can choose to have a lawyer or to represent themselves. It is a good idea to have a lawyer because he will be best fit to defend someone because of his experience and practice.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zero Tolerance Case Study

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Judge Civarelli denied juveniles their constitutional right of the 6th amendment: right to counsel. He claims that only once did he deny the right to counsel to a juvenile and the rest, if requested, could have asked for counsel and they would have placed the case in a continuance. As we see in the…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon's Trumpet Analysis

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Everyday people around the nation are brought to trial. The litigants may or may not have sufficient resources, but are still entitled to a fair trial under the Sixth Amendment. Clarence Earl Gideon was accused of felony by the state of Florida and did not have the money for attorney representation. Instead, Gideon had to approach the Florida court system blinded by the rules of litigation and unaware of the processes of making an argument. He was helpless and could not win the battle, eventually being sentenced to five years in prison. In America, people are supposed to be treated equal in the eyes of the law, yet Gideon’s circumstance was unjust. As he ultimately reached the Supreme Court of the United States, Gideon was given an attorney. However, here he challenged the state of Florida for his rights. According to Marc Galanter, there is no way that Gideon should have won the appeal in the Supreme Court. Gideon was a one-shooter, lacking resources. Despite Gideon’s loss in the state court, he still won his appeal in federal court system, shaping the law to impact society and showing that “the haves” do not “always come out ahead”.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Lasnik Case

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Right to an Attorney Who Actually Does His Job The public defense systems of two towns near Seattle, Washington were found to be so in adequate that they violate the sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel in criminal prosecutions. U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik condemned the cities of Mount Vernon and Burlington, Washington for failing to provide meaningful representation to indigent defendants facing misdemeanor charges. A class-action suit against the cities, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington affiliate and private citizens went to trial in June.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thorpe, M. (2012). U.S. Law and the History of English Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/CommonLaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Courts have carefully evaluated the press’s First Amendment rights against the defendants Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. In doing so, the Court takes…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a reason the U.S. Supreme Court Justices tend to quote Dickens frequently in their opinions: he usually some good points about the law. When it comes to legal fees, Dickens often pontificated as to whether it was ever possible to have a fair trial when money determined the quality of representation. Two hundred years later and on the opposite side of the Atlantic, this issue is still ripe for debate because regardless of all the services available; social equality in the law does not exist - particularly when it comes to the mentally ill or disabled. This paper will discuss the ethical issues surrounding legal fees, examine the options for representation available, and touch upon how this affects the mentally ill or disabled - a group…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sixth amendment has to do with a speedy trial. The defendant has a right to a quick hearing.The court system cannot procrastinate and delay the prosecutor’s trial for any reason. The defendant is also entitled to a lawyer and they also have the right to an impartial jury. The defendant has the right to know who is accusing them of committing the crime. So the main points behind the sixth amendment are having a speedy trial, holding a public trial, the right to a jury, arraignment clause (which means they’ll be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation), confrontation clause (confronted with the witnesses against him), a compulsory process clause (obtaining witnesses in his favor), and a right to counsel clause (right to having…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Story, Joseph. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution. Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange, 2001.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The amendment guarantees a “speedy and public” trial with a jury. Defendants are also given the right to be represented by a lawyer, question witnesses, and know if charges are being made against them.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kesha Ray November 25, 2013 Constitutional Law Judge Clariday The Sixth Amendment The Sixth Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights which consist of the first ten amendments that gives citizens’ rights and privileges. “The Sixth Amendment was introduced as a part of the Bill of Rights into the United States Constitution on September 5, 1789 and was voted for by 9 out of 12 states on December 15, 1791” (Laws, 2013). James Madison implemented the Sixth Amendment into the Bill of Rights. The Sixth Amendment was created to protect the basic rights of the accused. In earlier years, kings and churches would abuse their power and accuse people of crimes that they did not commit to get the person to go away. The Sixth Amendment was founded by the founding fathers, who rebelled against the treatment that they received by the British in matters of crime and justice, so they felt that not only should the…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama, and overruled Betts v. Brady, which allowed selective application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states, itself previously binding only in federal cases. Instead, the court held that the right to the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right, essential for a fair trial, thereby emphasizing the procedural safeguards which were needed for due process of law. In this sense, the court ruled specifically that no one, regardless of wealth, education or class, should be charged with a crime and then be forced to face his accusers in court without the guidance of counsel. All of the other justices concurred in the judgment.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conclusion The criminal justice system has come a long way in providing Due Process for all defendants. Amongst all the opinions, one thing runs the same; each and every defendant must be provided adequate representation for their criminal cases. Whether or not the client can provide their own, legal assistance must be provided as to ensure the defendant’s rights are protected. The right to adequate counsel should never be a luxury only affluent people can provide, but thanks to the Sixth Amendment, every citizen has a right…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Congress (1776) The Declaration of Independence, Choices: About Freedom and Justice Concepts, (pp 81 -85), Pearson Custom Publishing (2008) Boston, MA.…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Devonair Cheeks February 22, 2014 Intro Criminal Justice Gideon v. Wainwright The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person brought into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, can’t be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law, can’t be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays