Preview

Richard III Literary Devices

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard III Literary Devices
Richard III Essay
The story of Richard III tells the tale of one of history’s most tyrannous kings who stopped at nothing to claim the throne. Set in colonial England, it’s a powerful story that is still relevant today of betrayal, honor, and the nature of man. It is also masterfully written, as Shakespeare uses language to depict imagery and provoke thoughts. Shakespeare uses literary devices to illustrate Richard’s tyrannous character in act 4 when Elizabeth and Margaret are grieving over their losses that Richard is responsible for and when he sends Tyrell to kill the princes in the tower.
In scene 4, Shakespeare uses an animal motif and a wheel of fortune motif to convey Richard’s personality. Elizabeth and Margaret are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The language is used in the scene to demonstrate Anne’s opinion of Richard as a cruel tyrant. Yet, through his cunning language, Richard is able manipulates Anne into marriage, increasing his political recognition to come closer to the crown and fulfilling his ambition.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard 3rd Comparison

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. List the people who die by Richard's orders in Act III. What does each of them realize as they die? What does this suggest about the idea of justice presented in the play?…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hsc essay 33

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard III- Richard, himself is very aware of the gap between his outwards reality and inward reality. As a consequence he carefully constructs his façade while fully acknowledging his Machiavellian motivations to the audience in his asides.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard III Fear Quotes

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard III is a remarkable, if not irregular, rendition of the renowned historical figure, Richard III. In it, Shakespeare poses Richard as a villain with no remorse towards others—without any fear. This is evident when Richard awakes and holds an internal dialogue in which he berates his conscience for giving him bad dreams. "What do I fear? Myself? There's none else by" (5.5.136). He continues in this vein, first blaming and then defending himself for a short while. Ratcliffe enters and gets…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A values that is used in both King Richard III and Looking for Richard is the value of integrity. In order to claim power to the throne, Richard uses much deceit and the misuse of power throughout the play, which highlights Richard’s lack of integrity. It is through such devious and detailed schemes that the audience is able understand the importance of the value of integrity throughout one’s life. One of the clear misuses of power can be seen in the scene of the innocent murder of the princes where Tyrrel expresses “The tyrannous and blood act is done, the most arch deed of piteous massacre that ever yet this land was guilty of…within their alabaster innocent arms. Their lips were four red roses on a stalk…A book of prayers on their pillow lay.” Through this quote, Tyrell describes the murder as the most ruthless in the country and pledges the innocence of the princes through their pure, white skin, red lips and uses religious imagery to describe their angelic innocence. The juxtaposition of the evil deed of their murder and the description of the innocence of the princes highlights the evil that has come out of…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diction In Richard III

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As just young children, we are almost immediately taught about the power of our words. Parents constantly lecture children on the consequences of what they say, emphasizing how powerful just one word can be to someone. Often, we are taught this with bullying. A common saying we learned as children is “If you don’t have nothing to say, don’t say it at all.” Throughout Shakespeare’s epic, Richard III, there is a clear theme showing the power of word choice. Richard uses words to gain power, woo Lady Anne, motivate his army, and to trick Hastings in putting himself to death. Throughout Richard III, Shakespeare shows the power of diction in getting what one wants.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fling

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once Richard took the throne he was known as Richard III. He was the great-great-grandson of Edward III and the uncle of the previous king Edward V. It was rumoured that he caused the death of the princes in the tower. Although it was never proven he had a motive to do it because he wanted the throne for himself. To help himself get there he also started a rumour that Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville’s marriage was illegitimate because Edward had already been set to marry someone before Elizabeth. People believed what they heard which meant they believed that Edward V was also illegitimate to have the throne, and so shortly after Richard was made king. During his reign the Buckingham Rebellion took place. Henry Stafford, The Duke of Buckingham, was once a loyal supporter of Richard but switched sides to bring Richard down. This caused Richard to build a huge army, but it wasn’t particularly strong. The rebellion failed leaving Richard still on the throne; however it left a…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crossbow Persuasive Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no doubt that Richard and Joffrey shared similar personalities: they are both flagitious. In the play Richard III, Richard not only spreads rumors of his own brothers, but also kills them in order to gain more power and obtain the crown. Similarly, Joffrey slaughters every potential threat to his throne, from powerful nobles to innocent civilians. Despite the fact that they are both cruel, their ways of interpreting cruelty are profoundly different. Richard was a subtle, sneaky, deceitful person. In the play, he didn’t simply just stand out and kill people. On the contrary, he manipulated his followers to perform the murders. Consequently, other royalties would never expose his secrets. Joffrey, on the other hand, is a well-known tyrant. He kills people without evidence that they have betrayed the throne. Joffrey and Richard differ in their attitude towards others: while Richard III is shrewd and hides his motives, Joffrey let his emotions overrule his strategic developments. Joffrey’s impulsiveness is a critical factor to his final, though Richard III was able to successfully avoid death thus far in his…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many opposing sides battling each other. King Richard 3 and Richmond represent either side of this never ending battle. The battle is good versus evil, dark versus light, death versus life, the sun against the darkness. It isn’t just Richard and Richmond though; they are but mere soldiers in the battle. This battle arises constantly and at random. Sometimes the soldiers of the battle are more important. For instance, Hitler’s battle with the world is more important than some petty rivalry (which is still included in the battle). However, who’s to say which side is the light and which is the dark? “History is written by the victor.” Whoever wins each skirmish gets to let history know who was good, and they usually write themselves off as the light. Sometimes it’s obvious who was good, but we can’t be certain for every skirmish in our history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Life and Death of King Richard the Second, Shakespeare writes in the form of a historic play the last years of King Richard’s rule, and his ultimate demise. The arguably most significant speech in this play is given by John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. For readers to understand what Gaunt says to Richard in his final hours, it is important to evaluate how Gaunt perceives a king’s rule and what he requires from King Richard. Before his speech, he essentially views a true king as having a balance of two qualities: divine influence and human nature. Gaunt’s speech helps readers understand the play as he explains why Richard’s human nature will destroy him by overpowering the divine aspects that accompany his rule.…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays