Rhetorical Report Proposal

Rhetorical Report on Research in Writing Studies Having to pick only two pieces of writing to analyze was a challenge. There were many great topics that stood out, but out of them, these two topics stood out from the rest. In the first part of my report, the reader will gain an understanding of the main argument that is at hand for that specific piece on texting. This article was an argument that engages a reader and keeps them intrigued. The reader will have an understanding of what was the audience the report was presenting to and will also understand my opinion on texting and how it affects my literature capabilities. In the second part of the paper, the reader will get a glimpse of what a surgical short story is and how it helps doctors
The articles as a whole had no note from the editor. But at the end of the surgical short story, there was a section on notes for the reader on the article. On the YSW site, it stated the abstract in the short description on what the article would be about. There was little information on the writer who wrote these articles. The main information that was found was where they lived and where they had received their education and published these specific articles.
The article, “Texting and Writing”, found in Spotlight on First-Year Writing section that explores if textspeak is hindering the writing abilities of students or if it has no effect on students writing, while others still believe texting has a positive effect on writing. This text is a six-page research paper written by Michaela Cullington who attends Marywood University. The paper is arranged in four parts starting with the concerns of textspeak stated first, then responds to the concerns after. The first section is titled Concerns About Textspeak and goes in depth on how the form of texting is hindering students literature abilities. The second section is Responds to Concerns About Textspeak which is self-explanatory,
This theory has three main characteristics to identifying it. The first one is that it provides medical “terminology that expands or contracts the narrative gap by creating more or less room within the text for readers to “fill in” with their own complementary details to aid in the creation of empathy” (Bartlett 107). Also, surgical short stories use the precise terminology to show the audience the brutal truth about surgeries. Rather sugar coating the text they say it how it is. Lastly, suture theory helps the readers understand the medical problem they are faced in the reading. What this article did was examine five examples of surgical short stories, showing that the context was specified in the material it held and in some parts very broad in themes. The piece is arranged with an abstract introduction explaining what the article will be. What this article did was examine five examples of surgical short stories, showing that the context was specified in the material it held and in some parts very broad in themes. Following the one page introduction, there are five short stories that have been taken apart to show this so-called suture theory. To end the piece there is a section that goes in depth on how the surgical short story will change the doctor-patient relationship. The