Rhetorical Analysis Of Unpacking The Knapsack
Many people could say that white Americans are living with the fear that they didn’t really deserve their success, and that maybe luck and privilege had more to do with it, than brains and hard work, but there is always two sides to every story. That other side conflicts with that and say white Americans worked hard to get to where they are in life and it had nothing to do with privilege. There are numerous reasons for the widespread discrimination at all levels, but the main reason for the existence of discrimination is a privilege to certain groups of people, and widespread social prejudice towards certain groups of people. Differences between people have always existed, but they gain importance only when different importance are given to
…show more content…
She uses her observation of men’s attitude toward their privileges, and their unwillingness to accept that they are over privileged, as an analogy to introduce her claim that white privileges are alike to male privileges. By transferring the importance and the seriousness of the women’s rights movement to her topic of white privilege, she combines ethos and pathos to persuade the readers that this is an important issue in our …show more content…
According to him, all of these situations indicate the contrary: white people are often aware of their mark because they were taught about their so called privilege. But ordinary people such as working class, experience every day that white privilege is just a myth. “The Myth of White Privilege”, written by Selwyn Duke was published in an online magazine “American Thinker” on July 28, 2011. Selwyn Duke, is a columnist, public speaker, and Internet entrepreneur whose work has been published widely online, and also in print. He was motivated to write this column by learning about “The White privilege conference” and their ideas such as “Whites are taught not to recognize White privilege” and “special freedom or immunity from some liabilities or burdens to which nonwhite persons are subject.” The column is appealing to people of all races. The author wrote the text as a column with an explanation of why he wrote it as he did. The piece has been well covered and linked to the source of information. Duke used an informal - journalistic style to write his article. His piece is universal, factual, laconic and serious. He uses analogy by finding other examples of the same thing and breaks some facts down to analyze them in
She uses her observation of men’s attitude toward their privileges, and their unwillingness to accept that they are over privileged, as an analogy to introduce her claim that white privileges are alike to male privileges. By transferring the importance and the seriousness of the women’s rights movement to her topic of white privilege, she combines ethos and pathos to persuade the readers that this is an important issue in our …show more content…
According to him, all of these situations indicate the contrary: white people are often aware of their mark because they were taught about their so called privilege. But ordinary people such as working class, experience every day that white privilege is just a myth. “The Myth of White Privilege”, written by Selwyn Duke was published in an online magazine “American Thinker” on July 28, 2011. Selwyn Duke, is a columnist, public speaker, and Internet entrepreneur whose work has been published widely online, and also in print. He was motivated to write this column by learning about “The White privilege conference” and their ideas such as “Whites are taught not to recognize White privilege” and “special freedom or immunity from some liabilities or burdens to which nonwhite persons are subject.” The column is appealing to people of all races. The author wrote the text as a column with an explanation of why he wrote it as he did. The piece has been well covered and linked to the source of information. Duke used an informal - journalistic style to write his article. His piece is universal, factual, laconic and serious. He uses analogy by finding other examples of the same thing and breaks some facts down to analyze them in