Preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Trump's Inaugural Address

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis Of Trump's Inaugural Address
President Donald J. Trump has certainly been one of the most controversial and outspoken candidates in United States history, and given that reputation one would expect nothing less from him for his inaugural address. While one could certainly decide how well Trump’s speech went based on party affiliations, most Americans will analyze the speech itself for the answer. By understanding Aristotle’s three modes of persuasion ( logos, ethos, and pathos) one can investigate how much of a success Trump’s speech truly was.
President Trump’s use of logos in his inaugural address is quite exiguous, which reflects negatively on the speech as whole, since logos is an imperative part of rhetorics. In the 2017 inaugural address, President Trump was vastly
…show more content…
In his speech, President Trump made promises such as, “America will start winning again, winning like never before,” and, “I will fight for you with every breath in my body and I will never ever let you down.” These quotes accurately demonstrate the use of pathos, since they are quite passionate and are precisely aimed at getting an emotional response from the audience. Following these statements, President Trump again used pathos when he declared “When America is united, America is totally unstoppable.” President Trump uses this proclamation to drive home the motive behind his address, to not only electrify the audience about his presidency but America as a nation. Although Trump used pathos correctly in his speech, his excessive use of this literary device creates an insipid and redundant inaugural address, due to his lack of content. Several educational state, “Many texts from the modern press or politicians are heavily dependent on pathos appeals. Appeals to pathos touch an emotional nerve and compel people to not only listen, but to also take the next step and act in the world” (“Understanding Modes of Rhetorical Appeal: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos”). Pathos is needed for a compelling rhetoric, however when one solely relies on this device, it can have the opposite of the desired impact, and showcase an inadequate speech

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In the politically motivated masterpiece Constructing the Political Spectacle, political scientist Murray Edelman argues that, politicians play with ambiguous language and false constructs to manipulate public ideology on current events. The author illustrates that by doing so, politicians can sway public opinion on matters that align with the goals of politicians. This analysis illustrates how President Trump utilized the elements of Edelman’s political spectacle in the 2018 State of the Union Address. This analysis identifies how President Trump constructs problems and enemies from within our country by illustrating how he plays on the opposing viewpoints of liberals and conservatives. By focusing on polarizing issues such as immigration,…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When giving a speech a speaker must be able to connect with his audience, the speaker wants his/her speech to be easy to follow and easy to understand. It is for those specific reasons that speakers purposely put in lots of logos, pathos, and ethos into their speeches so that the audiences can connect emotionally, ethically, and intellectually with what they are talking about. A particular speech that uses many examples of pathos, logos, and ethos is The Great Arsenal of Democracy given by President Roosevelt on December 29, 1940. Throughout the speech President Roosevelt uses excessive amounts of pathos to connect with his people emotionally. He plays on their pride, fear, and the feelings of shame. He uses logos to express the facts and reasoning behind why the American people should help the British. The president knows that his people won’t go on blind faith; they need facts and reasoning to help the British. It is also because of the knowledge that the American won’t go blindly into war just to help, that he also puts lots of ethos into it to appeal to their ethical side. FDR wants the American people to see him as a strong leader who has a plan, as well as; the best interest for his people in mind. He is truthful and honest with them and lays down the line that if they don’t help the UK that America will be in even greater danger if the UK was to fall to the Nazis. It is for the safety of America that the president wants his people to feel emotionally, ethically, and intellectually unified with Great Britain so that by saving them they can save themselves from an even bigger threat down the road.…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Lincoln’s opening lines of his speech, he establishes that he knows that neither attitude has changed. The North is still pressing for expulsion of slavery and the South is still pushing for expansion of slavery. However, he establishes that slavery is not the point of his address. He uses words such as “extended,” “pursued,” “progress” and “reasonably satisfactory” to show that his main points are the effects the war will have on future generations. He does not address the issue with a condescending tone: he speaks in a supportive, optimistic way that encourages unity.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All great speeches contain ingenious rhetorical strategies. It is a great way to captivate and relate the gist of it all to the audience. In his second Inaugural address, Abraham Lincoln's purpose was to reflect on the ever-lasting Civil War and look forth to peace. His strategy is to convey his view with God as his witness. President Lincoln successfully achieves his purpose of contemplating the effects of the Civil War and offering his vision for the future of the nation, using meaningful rhetorical strategies.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most severe depression ever encountered by the Western industrialized world began in 1929 and had reached its nadir in 1933. The unemployment rate was at about 24.9%, with around 13 million Americans not being able to find work, predominantly through no fault of their own. The United States Gross Domestic Product was at its lowest point. Thousands of banks had closed their doors while banks offered no guarantees on the money that they were supposed to be accountable for. The Great Depression negatively affected the entire world; in only 3 short years from the start of the depression, the World Wide GDP had fallen 15%. Beyond the shattered economy, the Great Depression had depleted the morale of a once triumphant nation.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 16th at his very own Trump Tower in New York City, Donald Trump announced that he would be running for president. It was only thirty seconds into his speech when Trump committed his first fallacy. In an attempt to insult the intelligence of his fellow GOP candidates, he compared their incompetence toward air conditioners to their supposed inability to beat ISIS. “They didn’t know the air-conditioner didn’t work,” “How are they going to beat ISIS?” This is a bad example fallacy due to his use of an example that fails to prove the conclusion and has little connection to it. Despite the complete lack of relation between Trump’s example and his conclusion, he was still able to provoke the audience into feelings of contempt toward the other…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the opening paragraph of Bush’s address he uses pathos the most and he does very effectively. A great example is when he put together the words “victims”,”moms and dads”, and “friends and neighbors”. He also uses the phrases “mass murders” and ‘attack” to make you feel scared. His creative usage of “our” as a pathos and ethos saying it 5 times makes us think that he is apart of the people and he lost apart of him too that day like…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his opening he alludes and appeals to the listeners sense of capitalism by referencing the founding fathers view of a bold declaration of independence with the backing of God (par. 42). By orientating the greatness and boldness of America with the will of God, he brings positive emotions to the surface. Clinton also states the nation’s need for each individual to rely on each other, because no one man can change a country alone (par. 38). He unifies the country with these words, by exemplifying the countries interdependence on each individual. Also, he discusses change in an anthropomorphic way, stating that we must make change or friend (par. 13). By comparing how we adapt to change in technology to how one develops friends or enemies, he draws on listeners past experiences and emotions in dealing with people. This appeal is designed to suggest that each individual has the choice on whether or not change will be his or her friend, making the listener feel the need to embrace change as Clinton has stated. He draws on a sense of nationalism in his speech by giving the democratic government of the United States an enormous compliment by stating “Our democracy must be not only the envy of the world but the engine of our own renewal (par. 19).” This statement not only makes the assumption that a government is the envied by the rest of the world, but also further states that it will shape the United States as it changes to flourish in the new era. This resounding statement evokes a strong sense of confidence and national pride by making each individual who was apart of the democratic process feel as though they have played a role in the best political system possible. Clinton uses pathos throughout his speech as the binding factor between all other forms of rhetoric. Without pathos, this speech would lose much of its…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    using a combination of ethos, pathos, and logos. The purpose of his speech was to…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Donald Trump’s use of rhetorical strategies truly made his inauguration speech stronger. People will respect him more now due to how he can speak in such a respectable matter. The use of rhetorical strategies in his speech should us another side of Trump I am sure not many of us have seen before. In conclusion, his use of diction and syntax lead to believe that he might actually prove many of us…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speeches often correlate, especially when they are written for a similar audience in a similar situation. For example, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “Pearl Harbor Address” appeals to Americans fear during the time of war. President Roosevelt states what has happened and how it will in turn affect the citizens of America. President Roosevelt also appeals to logic, stating that because America has been attacked, they must engage in World War II. In addition, President Roosevelt gives confidence to American citizens saying that, once they enter into World War II, they will win. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln empathizes with American citizens. At this time, President Lincoln addresses Americans who have come together to commemorate the lives that America has lost during the Civil War. He encourages Americans to join together to remember that these men have consecrated this ground. He encourages Americans to take courage and remember that they are together in a great country, just as President Roosevelt encouraged Americans to continue to take pride in their country and not to be discouraged. Both President Lincoln and Roosevelt use pathos, or emotion, to empathize with American citizens as well as ethos, or credibility, to be able to point out issues because of their positions as presidents.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By using a formal tone, structured diction, and a vernacular syntax, the nation and others saw a different side to Trump .He appropriately expressed his ideas on the social and economic problems that he will approach and that America will finally become a nation of the people, instead of it being in favor of the…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Bush delivered his speech for the 9/11 attack, some people would not have noticed that he was using Rhetorical devices while he was writing the speech and when he delivered it to the nation in the time of crisis. The five used in his speech were Sender(Ethos), Message, Emotional Strategies(Pathos), Logical Strategies (Logos), and Language (Ethos,Pathos,Logos) while delivering and having the people of America receive it in the way they needed it to be delivered to them to know that everything was going to be alright. So in this paper, we are going to analyze the speech he gave on 9/11.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My paper is about how many people have their own opinions about what being an American is. To complete my research I looked at various articles and videos to really see what everyone thinks. The American voice to me is that we should be able to have freedom and we should have many opportunities to do what we want. In my opinion, I believe that Barack Obama is the best representation of America because he seems like he really cares about even the future of America. Being in American to me means that we have rights to be what we want to be. No other place has what America has, and that is life, liberty and equality.In my paper I will be talking about how different people view the way America, or what is to be American to…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This speech began as epideictic, with a brief mention of his condolences for the families and the lives lost, and included a moment of silence. However, the remainder of his speech turned to a more deliberative type of oratory, which is also known as political rhetoric. This type of rhetorical setting addresses topics such as war and peace, national defense, trade, and legislation, to assess what is harmful and beneficial (Herrick, 2016). During his speech, Trump delivered self-congratulatory comments, political attacks, and strove to instill fear of terrorism. His speech was used an opportunity to spread suspicion and to frame himself as uniquely positioned to make the country safer. There was no sincere outreach to the American public, and the facts he presented did not appear to match the rhetoric.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics