Preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Sex Lies And Conversation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis Of Sex Lies And Conversation
Jissell Navarrete
Professor M. Harris
English 111
16 November, 2016 Sex, Lies and Conversations
What is the importance of communication? Communication is an important life skill that helps to people connect by building respect and trust; it can resolve differences in the environment. In Deborah Tannen’s essay “Sex, Lies and Conversations” she highlights the different styles of communication of man and woman. Tannen opens her essay with an anecdote that grabs the reader’s attention with her own personal experiences. Tannen discusses how men and women communicate with each other, how different the ways of communications for opposite sexes are, and how this can
…show more content…
She uses this tactic of persuasion to get to the main point on how men and women have grown up with different types of communication with the same and opposite sex. As she states “these systematic differences in childhood socialization make talk between women and men like cross-cultural communication” (Tannen 264). Tannen stated that man and a women have different ways of communicating with each other based on how they are raised to communicate. As kids we grow up to find a friend within the same sex; it’s what they are comfortable with at first. But as we get older and when it comes to talking to the opposite sex it’s difficult because it’s out of both genders comfort zone. She explains in her essay that “intimacy is the fabric of relationships” and girls create and maintain friendship by exchanging secrets, but boys struggle to avoid the subordinate position in the group (Tannen, 264). Another example that Tannen uses logos is by using analogies that make a comparison between the situations a man and woman experience in communication. Tannen uses other well-known sociologists that have reported facts of woman and man communication. For instance, she brings in author Catherine Riessman of “Divorce Talk”, states that, …show more content…
This can also relate to similar situations or articles that list these differences such as “Are We Speaking a Different Language?” by Lisa Evans where she states “The idea that men and women speak a different language is well-worn in regards to personal relationships”. However, Tannen reassures us, learning about these communication differences can help couples express their feelings and to listen one another. Tannen talks about ethos; Tannen quotes different books and articles to back up her claims. To continue to persuade the reader, we find logos in her essay, because she uses factual evidence to back up her claims, quoting sociologists like Catherine Kohler Riessman who talks about divorce, and also an American psychologist who talks about children’s development. Lastly, Tannen also uses figurative language. She appeals to our emotions and values by talking about how both genders interact with each other, making the reader either agree or disagree. Her strategies are really effective because she builds her credibility, sounds factual and connects to the reader. The purpose of her essay is to illustrate the differences of a men and woman interaction within the conversations in their relationship. And ultimately, she does a good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Can differences in communication between men and women be defined as black and white? Deborah Tannen’s essay “But What Do You Mean” divided the biggest areas of miscommunication between men and women into seven categories, three of which caught my attention for personal reasons. As examined, women have a habit of apologizing to maintain a pleasant atmosphere. Tannen expressed how men and women react to complaints, as well. Jokes were also discussed, suggesting that men razz each other to maintain a one-up position; however, women’s jokes tend to put themselves down. Regarding Tannen’s description of these three communication categories, my personal experiences fall more within a grey area rather than assigning themselves to black and white roles.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays are both talking about communication. One is focus primarily on the way different genders communicate whereas the other focuses on the ways different cultures communicate. The essays we are going to examine are “Indecent Exposure” by Carla Power and “Sex, Lies and Conversation” by Deborah Tannen. These essays use research to back up their claims. My personal favorite of the two essays is Tannen’s. I found it to be more humorous and I seen these differences firsthand. Whereas Power’s although informative and important had a more melancholy tone. Both essays have their merit but I choose to support Tannen’s more. We’ll examine further on their similarities by showing their way they present their argument, the way it sounds…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Amusing

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Deborah Tannen’s You Just Don’t Understand has a very ordered structure. Tannen organizes her book in an alternating point style. All of Tannen’s chapters are filled with sub-chapters. The sub-chapters contain material with a sharper focus on the chapter’s main topic. Throughout the chapters of the book, Tannen first specifies the various issues men and women face in conversation. Next, Tannen provides an example of the issue occurring in the everyday life. Lastly, Tannen offers either a solution or a way to compromise the problem. Additionally, in the start of the book, she begins with broadly focused chapters describing the reasons behind various miscommunications. As the book goes on, Tannen begins writing on more specific issues and solutions, pinpointing the main causes for misunderstandings between genders.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laura Schlessinger sees women as the issue in relationships, author Deborah Tannen believes that both genders cause problems in relationships. Tannen shows all the research she conducted that allows the reader to infer that males and females are very different. Obviously males and females are raised differently, but it seems no one expected for that to affect their relationships. Tannen provides evidence that shows the different mindset of males and females when she explains, “For women, as for girls, intimacy is the fabric of relationships, and talk is the thread from which it is woven. Bonds between boys can be as intense as girls’, but they are based less on talking, more on doing things together” (1). Simply, boys and girls are wired differently. They have a different mindset about what is most important in a relationship. Because they each have a different way of thinking, it can often cause problems. Those problems are getting more difficult to solve. Both the male and female want to be right and not at fault for why they fought. That concept is easy to understand after reading, “Sex, Lies and Conversation,” because Tannen explains it thoroughly. In relationships, the male and female tend to find a flaw in their partner and use it against them in the argument. An example of this is given when Tannen stated, “Many of the psychological explanations that have become second nature may not be helpful, because they tend to blame either women (for not being assertive enough) or men (for not being in touch with their feelings)” (3). These flaws are used against the other person in an argument. Evidently, it is not only the female’s fault as to why the relationship is not working; it can also be the male’s…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deborah Tannen

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Secondly, Tannen does observations that allow her to show how men and women tend to have discussions. While men tend to be more joking, women talk more about their problems. “When…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's Society conversations between males and females has become difficult. There are a lot of miscommunications between males and females. In Deborah Tannen’s article “ Sex, Lies and Conversations” Tannen talks about how men and women talk differently to each other as well as the misunderstandings between each. She believed that no one person was at fault, whereas the differences caused by sexual standards. I feel that communication changes between males and females when in a different age group. These groups range from children, to teens, and adults.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sex, Lies, and Conversation is a very interesting piece written by Deborah Tannen in which she discusses how men and women communicate in different ways, albeit with each other or with the opposite sex. She lists three different points which are, how contact is made in these conversations, how each other reacts to this contact, and we were all raised and taught differently in communication, determined by our sex. She drives home these points throughout her piece by using cold hard facts to support her claims.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way women converse varies greatly from the way men tend to converse. Even young girls and boys have very different ways of communicating with one another. Young children tend to play with other children of the same gender, and the boys and girls tend to have completely different social interactions with one another. Tannen states that “these systematic differences in childhood socialization make talk between women and men like cross-cultural communication, heir to all the attraction and pitfalls of that enticing but difficult enterprise (51).” We see in women and in young girls, talk creates intimacy and intimacy creates friendships, but men and boys tend to bond more on doing things with one another rather than talking to each other. Even the stance men take when talking varies from a woman’s.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Dr. Louann Brizandine, in a 24 hour period, the average man will speak anywhere from 7000-10,000 words, whereas a woman can speak anywhere from 20,000-24,000 words. Thousands upon thousands of words are thrown out of the human brains, but how many of those are truly understood? More importantly, how many of those are not? In Deborah Tannen 's essay, "Sex, Lies, and Conversation," pathos and logos are dropped in bombshells in order for the reader to feel accessible to such information. She poses the question, "Why is it so hard to talk to my spouse?" Through various statistics and examples, she makes the reader feel like it is his or her world she is talking about, or individualizing the audience members. The pathos in this essay mostly stirs the inner desire for a happy marriage; she simply makes the male or female reader feel like they too have misinterpreted the opposite sex. Suddenly, the reader might feel guilty, but then relieved when Tannen displays the solution. However, the statistics, quotes, and facts in the essay…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    You Just Don’t Understand Women and Men in Conversation by Deborah Tannen is basically an explanation on how women and men converse. Tannens main goal is to give advice to the different genders in order for them to avoid as much conflict as possible. Tannen’s main ideas are to explain how differently women and men react to each other’s way of being. It’s like they’re in their own little world while living in the same big world. Men tend to try to dominate situations and tend to always want to be at the top. Women do not tend to want to get into conflict but tend to show understanding. These big differences bring them into conflict. A Tannen explains, “What he wanted conflicted with what she wanted”. (40) Women and men are constantly clashing in opinions.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft Essay

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tannen, Deborah. "Sex, Lies and Conversation; Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?." Georgetown University: Web hosting. Washington Post, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2012. <http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/tannend/sexlies.htm>…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Relational Dialectic theory is valid when one is identifying the source of conflicts in relationships. In such situations, it is clear that the thoughts and the actions of those in a relationship clash. It helps establish a binding position for discussions, because of the “contradiction between connection and autonomy as primary strain within all relationships. If one side wins this me-we tug-of-war, the relationship loses” (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks, 2015, pp. 139). It occurs that when people are in a relationship, they have to accept one another and create terms of engagement. But in the pursuit of these terms, one can create tensions with the internal values gained from experience. On the other hand, aspects of the Genderlects Style occur when men and women converse. While women will be interested in cultivating emotional depth, men will avoid sentimentalism. As such, their discussions will be based on facts and fewer assumptions. Men also seek to accentuate status, but women tend to focus on social bonds. The Genderlect Style extends cultural theories to the genders asserting that “understanding each other’s style, and the motives behind it, is the first step in overcoming destructive responses” (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks, 2015, pp. 438). For example, it uses the same principle that explains the difference between Americans and Chinese in interactions and applies the same elements to gender…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Floyd (2011) discusses the many ways that gender affects interpersonal relationships. He describes is as a “defining feature of our identity, shaping the way we think, look, and communicate” (p. 51). It is explained that each gender culture puts emphasis on different parts of the relationship. Women come to value communication and closeness, while men value taking part in activities together (Floyd, 2011, p. 57). This makes sense when I think about how I communicate with men versus with women.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude with, I would say that the differences between men and women –in their communication styles doesn’t mean that one’s sex whether it be man or woman is better than the other; it simply means that both styles of communication are equally effective to that gender.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Damned If You Do

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In my Chemistry class, there are two students who always ask make remarks or ask questions about the topics discussed: a male and a female. When the male student asks questions, the people in my class sit quietly and listen to the professor’s explanation, but when the female student asks questions, the class—including myself— gets annoyed. They begin to roll their eyes and sneer. Even my professor seems to be annoyed at times. Often I hear my classmates complaining about her during break. They nag about how much she interrupts class with her foolish questions and interpretations, yet no one complains about the male classmate. I thought to myself, “Maybe he asks better questions than she?” But after a few weeks I began to realize that the intelligence of their questions and comments tends to be the same. So why do my classmates favor the male student’s remarks over the female student’s? Everyone has their own way of saying things, however the way we hear what a women says is often completely different in comparison to how we would hear it if a man had said it instead.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays