Preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Legalised'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Legalised'
Juliette Hughes wrote an article for The Age newspaper about how she thinks drugs should be legalised. She used many different sorts of metalanguage techniques such as using expert’s opinion, appealing to people’s self-interest etc. Hughes is an ethicist; her point of view is from an ethical standpoint. Hughes used examples from history and scientific experiment. The intended audience is a mature audience, who are open minded about the legalisation of drugs.
Hughes starts off by talking about cannabis and the effect it has. This leads to talking about drug users being criminalised and how she opposes. Hughes writes “whether we approve of the activity or not, it is not ethical to punish people for what they do to themselves.” She is appealing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    ("About marijuana," 2010). I hope to convince the reader as to why the legalization of marijuana would benefit society instead of criminalizing a natural substance that has been…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article entitled “Would Legalized Drugs Produce a Zombie Nation?”(Cederblorn and Paulsen, 332 - 334) written by Stephen Chapman. The author (Stephen Chapman) provides a clear details and analogy of the drug use and abuse in the American society. The article gave a picture of a theoretical view where the use of banned drugs is legitimized by the United States government. The unbelievable situation of having a legitimate way of circulating the proscribed drugs would create a lot of chaos in the communities and society in general.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Com/220 Appendix F

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    |In what ways is this topic appropriate for a |Drugs are everywhere, whether it’s illegal or legal. This essay will help |…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Syvret, in his opinion piece (The Courier-Mail, January 11, 2014) believes that Australia's laws prohibiting marijuana are inadequate as it is encouraging an illegal drug trade and makes little economic sense. He exacerbates the concern through various techniques, associating inordinate dangers with the prohibition of the drug, urging the government to legalise the drug; before the situation becomes irrepressible. The tone established by Syvret is reasonable and educational, as he relies on the experiences from the US and Mexico to demonstrate Australia’s need to change.…

    • 796 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1980s and early ‘90s, Nancy Reagan proposed an anti-drugs campaign with the slogan Just Say No. Her solution to the drug problem was to teach children to say no to drugs, and rely on self-restraint to defeat temptation. Reagan believed children would be able to turn away from drugs if they had parents who raised them to be morally sound. Conservatives give priority to Moral Strength, and see those who use marijuana and drugs as morally weak and lacking self-control. A drug user, then, must change their personal values instead of relying on drug treatment centers or social change in order to quit their habit, Lakoff explains, “If the metaphor of Moral Strength has priority over other forms of explanation, then your poverty or your…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1301 Eng

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two articles being discussed are on the topic of drug legalization, having my own opinion, what I’ve done is become completely open minded on the subject and only will judge the argumentative skills of the authors. Organizing it by article, I will review at the end of each analysis if the reader would have swayed my opinion. Judging on the use of ethos, pathos and logos to determine if the two authors give valid argument on Drug Legalization and the effects it would have on society, I will state which author has a higher chance to persuade the reader.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drugs Vidal Analysis

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Vidal author of "Drugs" witting in 1970 on New York Time's expresses the authors feeling and devotions making a stand on what she believes to be the truths, backing up every statement with facts or relatable historical events, which are relatable. The author Vidal speaks her mind about making drug illegal does not work, as to end drug addiction, deaths and trafficking, why legalizing drugs would work, and why nonetheless legalization is unlikely to happen, but also including Homage to Daniel Shays Collected Essays. The authors tone is opening straightforward and rational which haves a direct impact on the reader by the use of words creating an atmosphere of her true feelings on this subject which is that neither legalizing or abolishing drugs would solve the problem Americans are facing with the obsessive dealing of drugs which haves many effects on peoples'…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a very clear and accessible manner, Prof. David Nutt’s work argues the case for an evidence based approach, challenging elements of drug policy and myths on the harms of legal and illegal drugs. Relating the work to family, environmental and economic factors accompanied with the dangers of injury and death associated with different drugs, Nutt’s work demonstrates his framework for quantifying their harms. According to Nutt, in order to minimize these harms of drugs, public perception and policies must be informed by logical evidence and less determined by human ideology. His work, especially his book, Drugs without Hot Air, equips the reader with necessary knowledge of how drugs affect the body mentally and physically and how addiction happens. Nutt’s work contains very fascinating insight into the history of drug…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In "Against the legalization of Drugs", We've seen how James Q. Wilson says that Heroin and Cocaine should be kept illegal. Perhaps the strongest argument Wilson gives to support this claim, is that a government may rightly restrict an individual's liberty to prevent harm to others. Although this is in violation with an individual's freedom of thought and speech. In this paper, I will present two arguments from Kantian ethics and Douglas Husak that refute this idea, and further show that heroin and cocaine should not be kept illegal.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drugs have always been a social norm and throughout this essay I intend to look at four texts which portray drug use in different situations with different individuals. The four texts are songs, Deja Vu by Eminem, Chris Dolmeth by Hopsin, Ill Mind of Hopsin 6 by Hopsin and The Girls on Drugs by Wale. I have discovered two distinct connections in these songs, one of the connections is that there are many different reasons as to why people choose to do drugs, and the other connection is the purpose which is that the artists are trying to show us that the outcome of doing drugs will only ever be bad.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Bennett Drugs

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In William J. Bennett’s argument, Drugs: Should their Sale and Use Be Legalized, he tries to persuade the readers that drugs should not be legalized. He goes on to explain the national drug policy and the intellectuals that by and large are against it but have little to contribute to the matter. The argument like he says is a little one sided, there is a whole lot to say about the national drug policy and very little to say about the intellectuals.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “An End to the War on Weed”, Nathan Comp talks about how the legalization of marijuana has become a movement that has gained momentum in the past few decades and how, over the years, the number of people in favor of legalization has significantly increased. In this article, Comp seems to effectively use rhetoric to get his point across.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As Rolles so accurately points out, "the criminalisation of drugs has historically been presented as an emergency response to an imminent threat, rather than an evidence based health or social policy intervention". What the criminal justice system fails to take into account is that by enforcing punitive drug policies the issue at hand is merely subdued. This high level policy environment routinely ignores critical scientific engagement and is uniquely divorced from most public health and social policy norms, such as interventions using established indicators of health and wellbeing. Porter reminds us that the notion of 'drugs' as we understand it today is a relatively new invention, therefore classifying drugs as 'illegal' and punishing those…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays