Preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Enoch Powell's Speech 'Rivers Of Blood'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis Of Enoch Powell's Speech 'Rivers Of Blood'
Makayla Kirby
Mrs. Wilinski
English 10 3rd Hour
13 January 2016
Rivers of Blood “As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “The River Tiber foaming with much blood.” These were the famous words of Enoch Powell in his “Rivers of Blood” speech. With his use of rhetorical devices and fallacies, his speech came off as very effective.
Before Powell gave his speech, in Wolverhampton, England around twenty or thirty immigrants were arriving overseas and around fifteen to twenty additional families were coming to England. As a country they were allowing fifty-thousand immigrants to come in, allowing the immigrant-descended population to grow. “We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation,” Enoch made people believe.
“For Powell, immigration was a threat to
…show more content…
This rhetorical device was used to his advantage by asking questions he knew how to answer, to make people believe that he knew exactly what he was talking about. It made him seem smarter than he already was by being able to answer the questions on the spot. An example of this is when he said “I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation? The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so.” Anaphora was another device that was used. The use of repetition helped get his point across to his audience.
Although fallacies normally weaken a speech, Enoch Powell used his effective enough to strengthen his. He grouped people together using argument from omniscience, making the people wonder if they were part of the minority that he was talking about. There were also a large amount of euphemisms and connotations to have people more intrigued and nervous about what he was speaking of. He referred to the immigrants as evil multiple times to make sure that everyone would believe him and agree on the fact that they were an evil group of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr. King was a Babtist minister and had been advocating nonviolence and civil disobedience. He utilized many things in his approach to the speech. The powerful setting of the Lincon monument, the man who ended slavery, his appeal to both head and heart, his vivid and metaphorical use on language, use of contrast, reenforcment and repetition, his call to action, and he ends on a powerful and hopeful note. "Free at last, free at last, Great god a-mighty, we are free at…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Patrick Henry uses these rhetorical devices towards Britain to ease his way to get his thoughts across. The devices work because he is able to get into their heads and make a call to action. Henry uses Rhetorical questions to make them think about his thoughts he is asking. He alluded to many well know stories at the time, which was more gentle than saying harsher things. Two other devices he uses are imagery and parallelism. His speech today is very known and it worked against the Britains at the time to go to…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John F. Kennedy’s speech calling for stable steel prices, many methods are used to persuade. Kennedy uses logos, diction, and rhetorical modes as means to provoke action in his audience.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech, John Lewis acknowledges the support the marchers have towards the civil rights movement, but also states its limitations. Lewis does this by proclaiming that the marchers “support [the civil rights bill] with great reservations” (para 2). In other words, Lewis is trying to convey a sense of doubt and the idea that there are flaws in the civil rights bill. Lewis brings up this idea to ensure that the audience is aware that the fight for rights is not over yet. Furthermore, Lewis includes the use of imagery and rhetorical question to connect to the audience in the sense of pathos. The essence of Lewis’ argument was to make known how the journey to civil rights was still not complete. From this, readers can learn how important…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Communicating to a unfriendly or an aggressive people can be very complicated, hard, and impossible at times. It’s simply because those people are against you and don’t want the better for you or whatever reason you are fighting for. They’re blind as an eagle; They see the situation crystal clear yet, they ignore. This country we live in today is heading towards a sink hole under the presidency of Donald Trump. This news has created a unkind type of environment throughout the country with people disagreeing with us. We need to look at the example to deal with those unpleasant people. To help us learn how to deal with a hostile audience we will look at Dr. King’s letter from Birmingham City jail. Dr. King's message was thorough; Non-violent direct action to deal with such people who disagree with everything you seek for the better of all color people.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Large scale immigration took place into the UK after the end of World War 2 from former Commonwealth countries particularly the Caribbean and Indian Sub continent. People were invited here in order to work and assist in rebuilding Britain, but tensions with indigenous people in inner city areas caused some small scale rioting in 1958. MPs used the ongoing antagonisms to push racially motivated rhetoric, culminating in the famous “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968 by Enoch Powell, where he advocated reductions in immigration numbers and possible repatriation of those already in the UK. This meant that tensions continued to rise throughout the 1970's, and problems were exacerbated by the economic crises during the decade.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All great speeches evoke emotions and provoke thought in order to engage their audience. Through rhetorical treatment of human aspirations and beliefs speakers are able to ignite thought, stir emotions and in some cases even inspire their audiences to take action. This concept is evident in Paul Keating’s speech ‘Funeral For An Unknown Soldier’ (1993) and even more so in Noel Pearson’s speech ‘An Australian History For All Of Us’ (1996). The following interpretation of these two prescribed speeches will show how each speaker has used rhetorical devices to inspire emotion, thought and action but firstly it is important to know the context of these speeches in order to understand the impact they have on their audiences.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Speech Ethos Pathos Logos

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During every campaign season, politicians and activists seek approval of the public by affirming issues of concern and making decent pledges to the electorate. They use rhetorical techniques as well as political gimmickry to capture the public’s attention, get their approval and persuade them tactfully, all this in order to achieve power. This is interesting because the public’s approval plays a significant role in ascertaining the president’s political power and policy-making.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the many rhetorical devices they used rhetorical questions many times in their speeches in order to regain focus from their listeners, and add extra emotion. Patrick Henry, the writer of the Speech in the Virginia Convention used many rhetorical questions throughout his writing. He asks questions such as, " Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? " Using this type of questioning he is able to state his opinion, and he doesn't allow much time for protest. It forces his listeners to think about the points he is making, and it usually persuades them into his point of view.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Civil War, African Americans were initially not allowed to join the army, until after the war began in 1861. Although it was not yet permitted for African Americans to fight in the Civil War, Alfred M. Green foresaw the validation and encouraged African Americans to prepare for enlistment. Throughout his speech, Alfred M. Green points out America’s grandeur, acknowledges and refutes the opposition, and lastly, goes on to appeal to the public’s faith and fear in order to inflame their spirits of joining the Union forces. Alfred M. Green delivers his speech in hopes of persuading his fellow African Americans to join the Union forces in the Civil War.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During his speech Alfred M. Green uses various methods of persuasion in an attempt to get his fellow African Americans to join the Union forces during the Civil War. Alfred bases his speech on persuasion using an emotional connection, because he and his fellow African Americans were not allowed to fight in the war.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anwar Sadat Essay

    • 385 Words
    • 1 Page

    Great speeches combine rhetorical techniques and structuring to reveal and emphasise their key themes and memorable ideas. This is evident in Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Israeli Knesset all of which present ideas memorable in both their original contexts and to contemporary audiences.”, Paul Keating’s “Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier” and Sir William Deane’s “On the occasion of an ecumenical service for the victims of the canyoning tragedy”,…

    • 385 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, the speech can be said to be biased as he may have written it based on experience. There are certain aspects that I am concerned about. One would be: Why did he choose this particular figurative…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His use of imagery made what he was saying flow and the ethos he used gave him a stronger credibility. For example, he stated “...we will not be satisfied until ‘justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.’” (King). His simile expressed that America is a desert-- he wanted people to venture out toward the ocean. Moreover, he declared that “Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.” (King). The strong analogies he made clearly outlined his and every other African American’s dream and he mixed it into his speech well. Lastly, he decreed that “Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning.” (King). The flow of his hopes made it fairly easy to follow along which helped his speech greatly. His background with what he spoke about gave him a stronger sense of credibility and helped convince America’s people to change.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both President Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. mastered the technique of using words to effectively influence and persuade their audience into action. Their words delivered during difficult times in America’s history are still referenced today in speeches of prominent politicians. Additionally, their words are continuously analyzed for the rhetorical strategies applied in order for others to understand the techniques and apply them to their own speeches or writings. However, President Lincoln was able to use his words more effectively in order to influence his audience in comparison to Martin Luther King Jr.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays