Preview

Revolutionary War Dbq Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Revolutionary War Dbq Analysis
The colonists were in every right waging war and breaking away from the British. Not only was this justified but it was about time that they stood up for themselves and actually took action against the British. For instance, the colonist had no say in any governmental matters when it came to the British. They had every right to come apart and take over their own government. Moreover, they were being taxed an absurd amount of money for everything they did. Furthermore, why should the colonists be forced to pay for a war that they didn't even fight? It was time to take control. Additionally, Britain’s policy of salutary neglect, or a healthy ignoring of the colonies, gave them the chance of gaining more independence in their trade practices which …show more content…
The policy of mercantilism, the belief that colonies were established for the benefit of the mother country, played a major role in the colonies endeavor for freedom. The excerpts from, Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, by John Dickinson found in document 2 object the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts. The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 requiring a tax stamp on printed material, from newspapers to wills. In 1767 Parliament passed the Townshend Acts which taxed imports. Document 2 reveals the opposition of internal taxes, where producing revenue is the only objective. Dickinson specifically opposed those acts but there were many more influencing a revolution. Such as the Navigation Acts which forced colonists to trade with Britain and its possessions. Parliament imposed customs duties, or tariffs, to enforce the regulations. This act along with the Sugar Act caused smuggling among the colonies, importing foreign items and bribing colonial officials. Colonist viewed these new taxes as a threat to their liberties, and their natural rights were violated due to no representation in Parliament. “No Taxation without

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Restated Thesis. Taxation without representation was common in the 13 colonies. Colonists often debated about why a small island, Great Britain, should rule a piece of a continent, the 13 colonies, from 3,000 miles away. The Stamp Act was issued by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act directly taxed printed materials. In Document 2, John Dickinson, a political leader from Pennsylvania, shows his disagreement with the Stamp Act. John Dickinson shares that Great Britain never thought the colonies would thrive as much as they did, so when the British Parliament issued the Stamp Act, and it was just for the purpose of raising Britain’s revenue, he disagreed with it. In addition, all the laws regarding the colonies only talked about regulating trade but it never intended the raising of taxes. John Dickinson, like many other patriots tolerated the old taxes, but at the Stamp Act, they drew the line, because Britain was taking money from the abundant colonies, with no benefits in return. The Townshend Acts followed the Stamp Act in 1767. Similarly, in Document 2, John Dickinson talks about the Townshend Acts having the same purpose as the Stamp Act, bringing more money to Britain. However, this time, when the Townshend Acts were issued, the tax was hid in the price. Charles Townshend hoped the colonists would be glad there were no more taxes even though the taxes would be right in the price. Unfortunately for Great Britain, the colonists realized that Britain was trying to be sneaky and hide the tax, so they got even madder. Moreover, the British never…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many of the policies found most unacceptable by the colonists were those regarding taxation of goods. One of the first acts to anger the colonists was the Sugar Act of 1764. The law effectively ended the smuggling caused by the earlier Molasses Act. It ended it by charging the same amount that people were using to bribe dock masters, decreasing the profit the colonies made producing rum. Colonies fought the act, due to their belief that they were being taxed without representation, as well as decreasing the revenue of sugar plantations. The act was repealed in 1765, due to the harsh response of the colonies towards it. The same year, Parliament passed the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act taxed all printed documents, including wills and newspaper. The Act sparked fierce resistance against the British. The Sons of Liberty, a rebel group determined on stopping taxation, made examples of many British tax collectors. The British ended up making little, if any money. This can be contributed in part to the taxation of newspapers, whose owners would then unite patriots against the British through their newspaper. The British, making literally zero profit,…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq French and Indian War

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After 1763, Britain was in dire need for revenue to pay for the French and Indian War. Britain was clever on finding ways to raise revenue from the colonies. From 1650 to the end of the French and Indian War was a period of "salutary neglect". Britain had very little involvement in the lifestyle of the colonies. After the French and Indian War, Mercantilism became strictly enforced. Mercantilism was a form of raising revenue from the colonies in which the colonies could only trade with Great Britain and would import more than they exported. Under George Greenville was the solution to Britain’s money issues. It was to directly tax the colonies. The Stamp Act(1765) was passed by British Parliament to directly tax the colonies on all printed material from newspapers and wills to marriage licenses and playing cards. This put the colonies through a great distress. In (Document H.. Newspaper masthead, October 1765),It states times as"Dreadful, Doleful, Dismal,…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the French and Indian War, tensions grew between Britain and the colonies. American colonies were justified for waging war and breaking away from Britain because we were trying to defend ourselves from unfair Parliament measures that were imposed on us without our consent. Such as, being so poorly and unfairly treated by British officers, we had no other choice but to resist the power of Britain over us and fight for our independence; and having imposed high taxes on necessary things.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roles individuals played in the beginning of world war one, led to a shift in the American position regarding their entrance into the war. Some of these revolutionary individuals include Secretary of State Lansing, German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmerman, and President Woodrow Wilson.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonists sought independence from British government for a multitude of reasons. Tension quickly rose between England and the thirteen colonies due to the unjust taxing without fair representation in Parliament, the colonist’s rights to assemble were taken away by the British, and there were many unreasonable Acts and laws put into place in attempt to have complete control over the colonists as well as intimidate them. For these reasons and the suffering that the colonists endured at the hands of the British government, I feel that the colonists had plenty just causes to separate themselves from England.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women, African Americans, and Foreigners all had different roles that positively impacted the outcome of the revolution. Without these groups of people the colonists victory would not have happened.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ American Revolution

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In discussing the American revolution, the role of individual liberty and equality is at the forefront of important matters. While the war was viewed holistically as struggle between Great Britain and the colonists, there were also important internal issues among the colonists themselves. For instance, the equality of people among different social classes, races and genders played a serious role in terms of determining what kind of nation would most effectively foster equality. In Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty, chapter six offered insight into how these internal struggles manifested and what kind of implications they had. While matters such as social class, race and gender were important during the American Revolution, these factors were just few of many others related to the broader theme of equality. Throughout the secondary accounts of various social issues during the revolution, other facets of society such as religion and political views were also relevant to the discussion. Mainly, religious freedom was something that was also taken into account. In the segment titled Toward Religious Toleration, the author outlined that church and state had to be separated in order to ensure that people’s views were not used as means by which others were oppressed. James Madison even outlined that the United States of America would be a haven for those that were religiously oppressed in other nations. The attention paid towards religion reflected a much broader focus on holistic freedom. Despite this, the revolution was also a struggle with regards to freedom of opinion. For instance, The Limits of Liberty outlined that loyalists, or “those who retained their allegiance in the Crown,” were forced to swear allegiance and even chose to emigrate in some instances. This represented the nature of internal struggles within the revolution that extended beyond just Great Britain. Surely, not everyone in the revolution agreed that a new order was the right course of action for the…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Civil War was the bloodiest war the United States has ever fought - killing over 620,000 Americans and causing more destruction than any other war. Long standing conflicts and disagreements made the violent war seem inevitable years before it happened, and led to it becoming a major turning point in US history. Americans have struggled with sectionalism since the colonial days, as seen in the issue of slavery and states rights, and the passing of documents and compromises such as the Articles of Confederation in an attempt to unify the colonies. During the period around the Civil War, the universal idea of manifest destiny reignited sectionalism between states because of arguments over whether to admit new lands in the West as slave or…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all of the hardship and violence the British imposed on the colonists, the Americans were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain. The Colonists were justified in breaking away because the parliament passed laws that were unjustified, The British king was of tyranny, The Stamp Act of 1765, The Townshend Act and The Boston Massacre. All of this lead to the colonies joining together and rebelling against the British.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Birth of the Republic

    • 1232 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The British saw an opportunity to tax the colonies as well as demand more of their property from them to help benefit their own economic issues. They continued to tax the colonies until finally the Colonial people had had enough. The parliament tried to pass the Stamp Act which stated that the newspapers and other legal and commercial documents had to be taxed. They also tried to pass the Sugar Act which tried to tax people three cents on not only sugar but coffee, indigo, and wine as well. Most of the people felt that the British parliament did not have the right to tax them, and many of whom migrated to the colonies to escape British rule, yet they were still being controlled heavily by them. Before the Stamp Act could be finalized the Colonial people made for certain that the act did not get passed.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Neglect and conflict the colonists had with the british made an impact that would change the lives of millions. There are those who say the colonists were not justified for breaking away from the British because of the war they fought for the colonists. However the colonists were justified because the king violated the colonists rights, put the colonists in economic parallel and punished them instead of listening to their needs.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stamp Act Essay

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the acts King George III and the British Parliament placed on the colonists was the stamp act. The stamp act was passed by the British Parliament on March 22, 1765. The new tax was imposed on all colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used. What made the law so offensive to the colonists was not so much its immediate cost but the standard it seemed to set. In the past, taxes and duties on colonial trade had always been viewed as measures to regulate trading, not to…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonists had many justifications for declaring independence, including the British taxes they considered to be unfair and their beliefs that one family shouldn’t run the government, and the government was not giving them they natural rights they deserved. Although the colonists had a lot to lose by declaring independence, they had much more to gain if they were…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revolutionary War Analysis

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The time of the Dirty War was suitably volatile: amidst its failed war, the Argentine government’s mandates gave control to the government but took away the country’s strength.President Juan Perón, who propitiated policies of social welfare and maintained a brutal grip on his people, set the Dirty War in motion after his return to power in October 1973. The incoming military government temporarily kept Argentina afloat by borrowing increasingly large loans and delivering propaganda to its people. However, by the start of the 1980s, the government’s spending and lies caught up with them and both Argentina’s economy and popularity plummeted. As protests sparked across Argentina and international organizations discovered the dictatorship's human…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays