Restricting Gun Control Laws In The United States

Enforcing more constricting gun laws is not the answer! By restricting the American people’s right to bear arms, the government is infringing on the Second Amendment. There are plenty of laws currently in existence that would benefit the nation if they were only better enforced. In addition to this, a common misconception of the populace is that reducing the number privately owned guns will in turn reduce the number of fatalities involving firearms. This is, however, not the case. For example, Mexico has many inhibiting and restrictive gun control laws in place. However, 2012 statistics observe the dramatic eleven thousand three hundred and nine murders by gun in Mexico and the nine thousand one hundred and forty-three gun homicides in the United States. This also stands in the statistics regarding suicide rate. for example Lithuania has almost the smallest rate of gun ownership in the world, yet it has the highest suicide rate out of the 71 countries available with this information. likewise, Japan's laws have basically forbidden most types
in this case people would be required to include their name and location and a background check required for the exchange of weapons. this may not be a good idea a good course of action for two reasons. first, corrupt government has previously used gun registries as a means of locating and seizing privately owned weapons. this would be in direct violation of the Second Amendment, as previously stated, but considering the government is assumed to be entirely corrupt at this point, the Second Amendment is likely considered obsolete by the government. second, the information that would be required will be could be considered an invasion of privacy. the likelihood of a series of lawsuits popping up new to this issue of privacy is high. this would cause another set of laws regarding privacy to be suggested and other issues would could potentially snowball from