Response to Intervention Essay
Grand Canyon University: EDA 561
July 10, 2013
Response to Intervention
“Of all forms of mental activity, the most difficult to induce even in the minds of the young, who may be presumed not to have lost their flexibility, is the art of handling the same bundle of data as before, but placing them in a new system of relations with one another by giving them a different framework, all of which virtually means putting on a different kind of thinking-cap for the moment. It is easy to teach anybody a new fact…but it needs light from heaven above to enable a teacher to break the old framework in which the student is accustomed to seeing.” Arthur Koestler
Twenty-first century educational institutions are on a research journey exploring continued models, theories, plans, strategies and so much more to bring resolve to the problems facing our schools. Many schools are facing the ills of low performance and a decline in meeting Adequate Yearly Progress. Plans and studies to improve schools academic performance are on the rise. School leadership and districts continue to explore and search for the perfect research based model that will pull them up and out of the pit of despair to a maximum and successful learning community where students master learning through engaged instructional practices.
An alternative to classroom learning experiences evolving on the educational scene is Response to Intervention (RTI). Response to Intervention refers to the many ways created to assist teachers in implementing instruction through new and improved activities that will redirect low performance to successful outcomes. This program was birthed years ago out the policies established from No Child Left Behind. Response to Intervention (RTI) is a researched based model used by school systems all over the country to deter academic and behavioral failure in the educational system. Through the engagement of ‘scientifically based...
References: Danielson, C. (2002). Enhancing Student Achievement: A Framework for School Improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gentry, M. (2006, Fall 2006), No Child Left Behind: Neglecting Excellence. Roeper Review, 29(1), 24-27.
Interstate School Leaders Consortium (ISLLC) Standards: (2008)
Wedl, Robert J. (2005). Response to Intervention: An Alternative to Traditional Eligibility Criteria for Students with Disabilities. Education Evolving.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document