Resources and Capabilities
The purpose of this essay is to apply the resource based view to critically analyse how Toyota use their resources and capabilities to establish core competences, sustain competitive advantage and achieve their corporate strategy. Toyota Industries Corporation was established on November 18th 1926. Their business industries include; Manufacture and sales of textile machinery, automobiles, materials handling equipment and logistics (www.Toyotaindustries.com). For the purpose of this essay however, the automobile industry is the key focus with specific attention given to the vehicle market segment (see figure 1 below). Fig 1.
Toyota Motor Company was established on August 28th 1937. Within the vehicle industry, Toyota has become the world’s largest automotive manufacturer, overtaking General Motors in 2008 and produces sports and luxury vehicles, SUV’s, trucks, minivans and buses. Additionally Toyota’s subsidiaries manufacture Daihatsu mini-vehicles, with Hino motors producing trucks and buses. Vehicle parts are also produced by Toyota for its own use and to sell around the world, with Asia generating near 40% of vehicle and vehicle parts sales (www.Hoovers.com). Toyota Motor Corporation’s top competitors are; Ford Motor Company, General Motor Company and Honda Motors Co., Ltd (www.uk.finance.yahoo.com). The resource based view identifies that a firm is a set of resources and capabilities that determines strategy and performance (Grant 2005) (See fig.2 below). This view is a development from Porter’s (1980) structural perspective of strategy where emphasis is on the competitive environment rather than the resources and capabilities firms have, develop and evolve to compete (Miller et al 1996). Broadly speaking, a resource can be defined as: “An economic or productive factor required to accomplish an activity, or as means to undertake an enterprise and achieve a desired outcome” (businessdictionary.com). Resources can be categorised into types, each essential for creating competences. These include; physical, technological, financial, human and intellectual capital. Johnson et al (2008) defines resources as the tangible and intangible assets of an organisation, such as buildings, people and reputation (Johnson et al, 2008). Toyota is a vast organisation that competes in many markets (fig.1). Over the years it has built up its market resources in order to compete in an array of market segments. By using resources in an effective way, Toyota has created competences in ‘lean’ manufacturing, efficient supply chain management and inventory management. This has enabled flexible, reliable production on a global scale, whilst being able to react quickly to fast changing customer needs. These elements are at the heart of their strategy in the vehicle market segment (Chen 2004; Lee 2007; Vaghefi 2000). We will now take a look at Toyota’s resources in respect to the categories above. First are the financial resources. Net income was (Yen in millions) ¥209,456 (see appendix page 1) with a loss of ¥86,370 in the automotive sector (see appendix page 2). In the past Toyota has seen bigger profits and in turn have invested a lot of money in physical, technological and human resources, with many assets all over the globe. Using flexible production methods and standardised production, Toyota have invested heavily in physical and technological resources around the world in order to produce cheap and reliable cars in a number of markets. The graph below demonstrates the extent to which Toyota invests in assets (per employee) in comparison to their main competitors. Fig2.
Adapted from (Raghefi et al 2000)
Toyota has physical assets all over the world with facilities in Japan, North America, Europe, Asia, central and south America, Oceania and Africa (property, plants and equipment) and are valued at (US dollars in millions) $326,196 (see...
Bibliography: Bakker,H., Jones, W. and Nichols, M.. (1994). Using Core Competences to Develop New Business. Long Range Planning. 27 (6),
Bower, J. and Thomas, M. H. . (1988). Fast cycle capability for competitive power. Harvard Business Review. 66 (3), 110-118.
Chandler,D.L (1992). Organisational capabilities and the economic history of the industrial enterprise. Journal of Economic perspectives.
Curado, C. (2006). Organisational learning and organisational design. The Learning Organization. 13 (1), 25-48.
David C.B and Scanlan, G. (1995). Strategic Control through Core Competencies. Long Range Planning. 28 (2), 102-114.
Dyer, J.H., Nobeoka, K., 2000. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), 345–367.
Fiegenbaum,A., Stewart, H., Achedal,D. (1996). Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management Journal. 17 (6), 219-235
Gadden, L., Hakansson,H
Grant,R.M (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge. Organization Science. 7 (4), 375-387..
Grant, R.M.. (2005). Analyzing Resources and Capabilities. Contemporary Strategic Analysis. 5 (1), 130 - 185.
Grant,R.M and Fuller,C.B. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies. 41 (1), 61-84.
Henry, A. (2008). Understanding Strategic Management. New York: Oxford University Press. pp124-150.
Injazz J.C, Paulraja, A., Augustine A. L, (2004). Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management. 13 (12), 505–523.
Javidan,M. (1998). Core competence: What does it mean in practice?. Long Range Planning. 31 (1), 60-71.
Johnson, G., Scholes, K, and Whittington, R. 2008. Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education Limited.
Kakuro,A. (2004). Development of ‘science TQM’, a new principle of quality management: effectiveness of strategic stratified task team at Toyota. International Journal of Production Research. 14 (7), 3691–3706
Lee,B.H a & Jo,H.J
Micheline,A. (1999) Toyota Promises CustomerOrders in 5 Days, USA Today, August 6, B1.The New York Times, February 10, 1999, C1. 21 and October 18, 1998
Offodile, F.O and Arrington, D.
Prahalad, C. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard BusinessReview, Vol. 68 No. 3, pp. 67-101
Teece,J.D; Gary Pisano; Amy Shuen. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal. 18 (7),
Vaghefi,R., Woods,A., L. and Huellmantel,A. (2000). Toyota Story 2: Still Winning the Productivity Game. Business Strategy Review,.
Witcher,J.B and Chau,S.V. (2007). Balanced scorecard and hoshin kanri: dynamic capabilities for managing strategic fit. Management Decision. 45 (3), 518-538
Mahadevan, B. (2010). Operations Management: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. South Asia: Dorling Kindersley. p1-21.
Rifkin, J. (2000).The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism Where All of Life is a Paid-For Experience. USA: Ken Tarcher/Putnam. 1-312.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/resource.html Last Viewed (5/12/2011)
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/co?s=TM Last Viewed (24/11/2011)
http://www.trekconsulting.com/Publications/Articles/ThePowerofICAssessment.pdf Last View (10/12/2011)
Please join StudyMode to read the full document