Preview

Research Paper On The Right To Bear Arms

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
704 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research Paper On The Right To Bear Arms
Throughout history many have experienced the debate questioning who has the right to bear arms. This subject can easily affect each individual. The ownership of a fireman symbolizes personal protection. According to Pew Foundation: “seventy-nine percent of male gun owners and eighty percent of female gun owners said that owning a gun made them feel safer” (ProCon.org). There have been several court cases that concerned the second amendment. The Constitution was upheld in most cases; unfortunately, some were overruled unconstitutionally. The second amendment guarantees all Americans the right to bear arms. The Constitution of the United States was established to solve the problems that came after the Articles of Confederation. The Article …show more content…
Heller case. This case was the first one addressed in approximately seventy years that concerned the second amendment in only the second time that the “famous phrase was used: ‘the right to bear arms.’” Heller was allowed to protect himself on the job; however, he was not granted the permission to have a gun (“Supreme Court”). Heller states, “ D.C. law has it backwards: ‘I can protect federal workers, but, at the end of the day, they say,’ turn in your gun—you can’t protect your home’” (North). Heller and five others confronted the Districts Firearms Control and Regulation Act of 1975. The act consumed a strict gun control regulation that limited few from owning a personal firearm. This required all guns to be unloaded and put away after each shift. The court protected the Second Amendment of the Constitution in a five to four vote that an individual does have the right for personal protection with handguns (“Supreme …show more content…
Heller case, McDonald v. City of Chicago petition the right to consume a handgun in one’s home for self-defense. The city of Chicago and Oak Park suburb banded citizens the possessions of hand guns(Nieto). The court recognized that the murder rate has excelled since the ban was forced. The city is now facing one of the highest murder rates and violent crimes in the country (Coia). Otis McDonald desired the want own a firearm due to the right crime rate in his neighborhood. According to Chicago City Council, the hand gun ban was established to protect property and the lives of Chicago citizens. The petitioners believe that this ban increased the crime rate and left them to fin for their own safety. McDonald, himself, demonstrated safety procedures to eliminate such criminal activity. Colleen Lawson, another petitioner who experienced home burglary, believed that the chance of being killed in future acts would decrease while in the possession of a gun. Each petitioner due to the ban were obligated to keep their handguns outside the city which made home security incompetent. The court was first approached by the petitioners petitioning to overrule the current bans. Secondly, they petitioned that it did not meet the right of the second amendment. The Supreme Court voted five to four that the local bam was surely unconstitutional

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2nd Amendment.

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller 554 U.S. __, 128 S. Ct. 2783, 171 L. Ed. 2d 637 (2008)that the Second Amendment prohibits the Federal government from passing laws prohibiting an individual's right to possess a handgun in the home and requiring any firearms in the home to be inoperable during possession. However, the Court held that the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. The Federal government may enact some restrictions on firearms possession, such as: prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons, possession by felons and the mentally ill, possession in schools or government buildings, the conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms, possession of dangerous and unusual weapons (e.g., machine guns), and that…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a old saying that guns dont kill people, people kill people. This is a known saying that comes out all the time when this conversation pops up.The media portrays gun control in a positive light, they believe that this is something that would work; I believe that gun control will never work and giving people guns to protect themselves and taking guns from people the public judges or deems unfit is a terrible idea. It is unsafe, and also endangering people's lives and is unfair, plus it is going against the second amendment which many have died to protect.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals' access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Right to Bear Arms

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." ("Second Amendment to the United States Constitution"). Today, the interpretation of the amendment has polarized the American people among two different views (Greenslade, 2004). Those opposed to private ownership of firearms agrue that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms because the Second Amendment refers to the people 's collective right as a members of a well-regulated State militia. In contrast, the individual right view holds that individuals may bring claims or raise challenges based on a violation of their rights under the Second Amendment just as they do to vindicate individual rights secured by other provisions of the Bill of Rights. This view appears to be the most valid after placing the Second Amendment in appropriate historical and Constitutional context.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Library of Congress. (2011, April). United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court. Retrieved from…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with this the gun needed to be broke down, have a trigger lock, the ammo needed to be store in one room, while the firearm was stored in another room. DC said this needed to be done with the intent of not to use the firearm even in self defense. This violated the second amendment. Heller did not violate the second amendment rights in this case at all. The second amendment states we have the right to bare arms. The only time we are not allowed to carry a firearm on us is if we are a felon, on government or school properties, or selling firearms illegally. Heller was not doing any of these things. He simply wanted to protect himself and his family just like I would if I were him. He was also an officer, so for his job duties he needed a handgun on him at all times for…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Court orders reconsideration of Maryland gun law ruling” by Larry O’Dell February 2016, The Washington Post. Richmond, Va. Maryland’s assault weapons ban implicates it citizens Second Amendment rights and must be reviewed under a judicial standard. District Judge Catherine C. Blake gave gun-rights supporters a chance to argue to overturn and challenge the law. The Firearms Safety Act was passed after Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. The Act was a pro because it was designed to reduce gun violence and make the public safer. Maryland’s law affects the constitutional right to possess firearms for self-defense and home protection for the law-abiding citizens. Because of Maryland’s ban on commonly owned firearms violates an individual right…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every Time there is a violent crime involving guns the media and public leaders blame guns and not the person accused of committing the crime FBI conducted an experiment and people were likely to be killed by a handheld object five times more than a rifle. Banning guns will affect only the law abiding citizens not criminals. Criminals don't follow the law that's why they are called criminals. If you're going to outlaw guns then might as well ban everything on market that can potentially hurt people. Gun laws in the U.S. should not be restricted because…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment reflects the right of all Americans to own weapons for a legal purpose, such as self-defense in the home. It also recognizes the need for weapons to ensure safety for the citizens and keep a well-regulated militia. The prefatory clause refers to the concept of the militia being allowed to bear arms for the safety of the state. The operative clause is very controversial, as it discussed the average citizens ability to own a weapon. The District of Columbia vs. Heller case was centered on a Washington D.C. law that was enacted in 2008, prohibiting citizens to bear arms within their homes. The court claimed this law to be clearly unconstitutional, as it violated the command of the Second Amendment. A restriction still remained on the mentally ill and felon ownership of handguns, but every qualified individual was again granted permission to own a handgun for lawful purposes.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” To an average person this means that anyone at anytime should be able to possess a gun without being questioned. However, if you interpret the amendment based on vocabulary I believe this means that a trained group of people who have the countries best interest at hand to protect are the one protected under the constitution. Today there is a lot of debate about control and whether or not people should be aloud to have guns.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Only Washington, D.C. prevents concealed carry except for both active and retired law enforcement officers. This article explores both sides of the concealed carry debate. For example, between May 2007 and March 2010 statistics reveal that nine law enforcement officers and 142 non-law enforcement individuals were killed by concealed carry handgun permit holders across the nation. It is also statistically significant to note that the majority of those who legally carry concealed do not abuse their rights and are non-violent. While it may seem obvious that criminals are less likely to attack someone that they believe might be armed, it is also important to emphasize that handguns are not an effective form of self-defense often resulting in injury and death for the individual carrying. A concealed handgun significantly increases the chances of a confrontation escalating in violence to a lethal degree. The risk of suicide is magnified as a vast majority of all suicide attempts are done in times impulsiveness where not only owning, but carrying a handgun gives an individual a method to act. There are those proponents of concealed carry who will tout the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as a proof that citizens, who are to bear arms for a well-regulated militia, should be entitled to personal carry. Those on the anti concealed…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its second major ruling on gun rights in three years, ensuring our federally protected right to keep and bear arms in all 50 states. The ruling states that the right to "keep and bear arms" is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. No longer will State or local governments be allowed to ban most Americans from owning most types of handguns. The ruling effectively strikes down Chicago's handgun ban, not unlike the Washington D.C. law that was already ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court two years ago in D.C. v. Heller. Gun Rights Advocates hailed the decision across the Country as a major victory before the "conservative" majority…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control In Australia

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The second amendment of the US constitution stipules: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In the District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) decision, the US Supreme Court explains that the second amendment provides with two separate rights: the right to have a functioning fire arm at home for self-defense and the other right that is not clearly defined. After multiple shootings that happened in the recent years, the federal government feels the necessity to have a certain control over guns in the country. President Barack Obama tried to introduce in congress a universal background check that could not pass. Why Congress could…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays