Interracial Dating: The Implications of Race for Initiating a Romantic Relationship Tina M. Harris
Department of Speech Communication University of Georgia Athens, Georgia, USA
Pamela J. Kalb eisch
Department of Communication and Mass Media University of Wyoming Laramie, Wyoming, USA Currently, limited research exists that explores the socially taboo topic of interracial dating between African Americans and European Americans. Historically, African Americans and European Americans have had a highly destructive relationship of enslavement and oppression, which has resulted in a history of mistrust, according to P. H. Collins (African American Feminist Thought : Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment, New York,Routledge, 1990). As a result, this relationship symbolizes the institutionalized oppression embedded in race relations despite the very intimate nature of this romantic relationship. Using the centrality of race within the context of romantic relationships, this study was designed to determine how race in uences the communicative process. Q-sort methodology was used, which required participants to determine what waiting, hinting, direct, and third-party intervention strategies they would use to initiate a date in both same-race and interracial contexts. Findings reveal that when comparing verbal strategies across both contexts and open-ended responses to likelihood or reality of dating interracially, participants were resistant to the idea of dating a person from another race. External factors such as family and society were cited as primary deterrents to involvement in an interracial romantic relationship. In general, participants in this study used more social distancing strategies for initiating interracial dating relationships than same-race dating relationships. KEYWO RDS interracial, romance, dating, race, date initiation, strategies, relationships, Q-sort methodology, interracial dating. Address correspondence to Tina M. Harris, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Georgia, 128 Terrell Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA. E-mail: email@example.com. Copies of the Q-sort Items, Z Scores for Same-Race and Interracial Date Initiation, Same-Race and Interracial Q Sort Types and Strategies are available from this author. T he Howard J ournal of Communications, 11 :49–64, 2000 Copyright Ó 2000 Taylor & Francis 1064-6175 /00 $12.00 1 .00
T. M. Harris and P. J. Kalb eisch
esearch indicates that attitudes toward interracial romantic relationships are complex ; however, minimal attention has been given to motivating factors for involvement in such relationships. Public opinion polls ( Romano & Trescott, 1992) and self-reports ( Murstein, Merigihi, & Malloy, 1989) indicate that external pressures are ever present, and, consequently, relational partners are expected to dissolve these relationships for a myriad of ‘‘reasons.’’ Currently, two theories exist that articulate why most individuals might become involved in an interracial romantic relationship. Kouri and Lasswell ( 1993) used the structural theory and the racial motivation theory to better understand these motivations. The structural theory posits that demographics ( i.e., socioeconomic status, education, occupation, residence) and mutual attraction contribute to the initiation, development, and maintenance of an interracial marriage. Conversely, the racial motivation theory hypothesizes that interracial marriages occur because of racial diÚ erence, whereby at least one partner nds the racially diÚ erent other more appealing because of her or his race. In their in-depth interviews with interracial couples ( African Americans and European Americans) , Kouri and Lasswell ( 1993) found that 44 of the 46 interviewees were attracted to their partners due to similar values and interests, or overall compatibility ( structural theory) . Seven African Americans ( 1 female and 6 males) and 9 European...
References: Collins, P. H. ( 1990) . African American feminist thought : K nowledge, consciousness , and the politics of empowerment . New York : Routledge. Dickson, L. ( 1993) . The future of marriage and family in African American America. J ournal of African American Studies, 3( 4) , 472–491. Duncan, V. J., & Kalb eisch, P. J. ( 1996) . Patterns of trust and distrust across race and gender. Challeng e : A J ournal of Research on African American M en, 7( 4) , 5–28. Fitzpatrick, K. M., & Hwang, S. S. ( 1992) . The eÚ ects of community structure on opportunities for interracial contact : Extending blau’s macrostructural theory. Sociological Forum, 7( 3) , 517–536. Harris, T. M. ( 1994) . Date initiation : A q-sort analysis of dating behaviors in same race and interracial romantic relationships. Paper presented at the annual Speech Communication Association conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. Kouri, K. M., & Lasswell, M. ( 1993) . Black-white marriages: Social change and intergenerational mobility. M arriag e and Family Review, 19( 3–4) , 241–255. Leonard, R., & Locke, D. C. ( 1993) . Communication stereotypes: I s interracial communication possible? J ournal of Black Studies, 23( 3) , 332–343. Masini, E. B. ( 1993) . Future studies and the trends toward unity and diversity. International Social Science J ournal, 45( 3/137) , 323–331. Mongeau, P. A., & Carey, C. M. ( 1996) . Who’s wooing whom II ? An experimental investigation of date-initiation and expectancy violation. Western J ournal of Communication, 60( 3) , 195–213. Mongeau, P. A., Hale, J ., J ohnson, K. L., & Hillis, J . D. ( 1993) . Who’s wooing whom ? An investigation of female initiated dating. In P. J . Kalb eisch ( Ed.) Interpersonal communication : Evolving interpersonal relationships ( pp. 51–68) . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum. Mongeau, P. A., Yeazell, M., & Hale, J. L. ( 1994) . Sex di Ú erences in relational message interpretations on male- and female-initiated rst dates: A research note. J ournal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 731–742. Murstein, B., Merigihi, J . R., & Malloy, T. E. ( 1989) . Physical attractiveness and exchange theory in interracial dating. T he J ournal of Social Psychology, 129( 3) , 325–334. Orbe, M. ( 1995) . African American communication research: Toward a deeper understanding of interethnic communication. Western J ournal of Communication, 59( 1) , 61–78. Orbe, M. ( 1996) . Laying the foundation for co-cultural communication theory : An inductive approach to studying ‘‘non-dominant’’ communication strategies and the factors that in uence them. Communication Studies, 47, 157–176. Orbe, M. P. ( 1998) . From the standpoint( s) of traditionally muted groups: Explicating a co-cultural communication theoretical model. Communication T heory, 8( 1) , 1–26. Paset, P. S., & Taylor, R. ( 1991) . Black and white women’s attitudes toward interracial marriage. Psychological Reports, 69, 753–754. Romano, L., & Trescott, J. ( 1992) . Love in black and white, Redbook, 178( 4) , 88–94. Stephenson, W. ( 1953) . T he study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press. Suzuki, S. ( 1998) . I n-group and out-group communication patterns in international organizations. Communication Research, 25( 2) , 154–182. Todd, J ., McKinney, J. L., Harris, R., Chadderton, R., & Small, L. ( 1992) . Attitudes toward interracial dating : E Ú ects of age, sex, and race. J ournal of M ulticultural Counseling and Development, 20, 202–208. Weitz, R., & Gordon, L. ( 1993) . Images of African American women among Anglo college students. Sex Roles, 28, 1/2, 19–33.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document