Self-Awareness – Key to Effective Leadership
Mendemu Showry* and K V L Manasa**
Many theories and thinkers have attempted to explore what truly makes a person emerge as a leader. Successful leadership often surfaces when people become aware of critical personal experiences in their life, understand the driving forces, respond by rethinking about self, redirect their moves and reshape their actions. Stanford rates soft skill like selfawareness as one of the pillars of managerial capabilities that predicts managerial effectiveness and leadership success. It suggests that IQ and technical skills are far less important to leadership success than selfawareness. In a world of unprecedented business complexities, leaders, besides explicit knowledge, need an inner compass of self-awareness to walk the tight rope of leadership. The paper explores the concept selfawareness and traces the two essential components of self-awareness. The paper dwells on the reasons for self-ignorance arising out of individual’s inability to exploit two components. It also underlines how self-awareness contributes to self-actualization and managerial effectiveness.
An impartial and objective attitude toward oneself ... is a primary virtue, basic to the development of all others.
– Allport (1937, p. 422)
any theories and thinkers have attempted to explore what truly makes a person emerge as a leader. Successful leadership often surfaces when people become aware of critical personal experiences in their life, understand the driving forces, and respond by rethinking about self, redirect their moves and reshape their actions. The book, True North: Discover Your Authentic Leadership states that only those who scan their experiences to know who they really are and realize how they should live ultimately emerge as leaders. Stanford rates soft skill like self-awareness as one of the pillars of managerial capabilities that predicts managerial effectiveness and leadership success. It proposes that IQ and technical skills are far less important to leadership success than self-awareness. It exhorts that self-awareness—an exact estimation and evaluation of one’s own personality and a lucid understanding of how *
Assistant Professor, IBS Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Research Scholar, University College of Commerce and Business Management, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, India. E-mail: email@example.com
© 2014 IUP. All –Rights
others perceive one—is an indispensable trait that all good managers strive to develop to be successful leaders. A survey of 75 members of the Business Advisory Council of Stanford Graduate School rates self-awareness as the superior competency that leaders must develop. Harvard Business School enumerates self-awareness among the key attributes that their program seeks to develop in its candidates. Dartmouth, University of Chicago, and other Business Schools are all designing programs that focus on selfawareness as the vital step in leadership development. A survey of business leaders indicates that self-awareness is vital to success in organizational environments, and many business schools are introducing tools and processes to make the students become more self-reflective. In a world of unprecedented business complexities, spiraling competition and economic turbulence, leaders and managers dealing with competent employees and ever demanding customers, need an inner compass of self-awareness to walk the tight rope of leadership. Besides explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge related to self can be the hallmark of managerial success. The paper explores the concept selfawareness and traces the two essential components of self-awareness. Firstly, it dwells on self-ignorance arising out of an individual’s inability to exploit two components. It also underlines how self-awareness...
References: 1. Ashford S J (1986), “Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource
Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol
2. Ashford S J and Tsui A S (1991), “Self-Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness:
The Role of Active Feedback Seeking”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol
3. Avolio B J and Gardner W L (2005), “Authentic Leadership Development: Getting
to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol
4. Baron R A and Byrne D (1991), Social Psychology: Understanding Human
Interaction, 6th Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
5. Baumeister R F (1998), “The Self”, in D T Gilbert, S T Fiske and G Lindzey (Eds.),
The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp
6. Bem D J (1972), “Self-Perception Theory”, in L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, Vol
7. Burns Jodi A (2009), “Assessing the Importance of Building Self-Efficacy to Impact
Motivation, Performance Levels, and Team Effectiveness”, United States Sports
8. Campbell J D (1990), “Self-Esteem and Clarity of the Self-Concept”, Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, Vol
9. Church A H (1997), “Managerial Self-Awareness in High-Performing Individuals
in Organizations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol
10. Coopersmith S (1967), The Antecedents of Self-Esteem, Freeman, San Francisco.
11. Creed Douglas W E and Miles R E (1996), “Trust in Organizations – A Conceptual
Framework Linking Organizational Forms, Managerial Philosophies, and the
12. Downs Alan (1997), Beyond The Looking Glass: Overcoming the Seductive Culture
of Corporate Narcissism, Amacom.
13. Duval T S and Lalwani N (1999), “Objective Self-Awareness and Causal
Attributions for Self-Standard Discrepancies: Changing Self or Changing
14. Epstein S and Feist G J (1988), “Relation Between Self- and Other-Acceptance
and its Moderation by Identification”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
15. Finkelstein S (2003), “Seven Habits of Spectacularly Unsuccessful People”,
Business Strategy Review, Vol
16. Goleman D (1985), Vital Lies, Simple Truths: The Psychology of Self-Deception,
Simon and Schuster.
17. Goleman D (2000), “Leadership that Gets Results”, Harvard Business Review,
18. Goleman D, Boyatzis R and McKee A (2002), Primal Leadership: Realizing the
Power of Emotional Intelligence, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
19. Hall D T (2004), “Self-Awareness, Identity, and Leader Development”, in D V Day,
S J Zacarro and S M Halpin (Eds.), Leader Development for Transforming
20. Hogan R and Briggs S R (1986), “A Socioanalytic Interpretation of the Public and
the Private Selves”, in R F Baumeister (Ed.), Public Self and Private Life,
21. Ilies R, Morgeson F P and Nahrgang J D (2005), “Authentic Leadership and
Eudaemonic Well-Being: Understanding Leader-Follower Outcomes”, Leadership
22. Kunda Z (1990), “The Case for Motivated Reasoning”, Psychological Bulletin,
23. London M (2003), Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for
Performance Improvement, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
24. Luthans F and Avolio B J (2003), “Authentic Leadership: A Positive Developmental
Approach”, in K S Cameron, J E Dutton and R E Quinn (Eds.), Positive
25. Maslow A H (1962), Toward a Psychology of Being, D. Von Nostrand Company,
26. Moss S E and Sanchez J I (2004), “Are Your Employees Avoiding You? Managerial
Strategies for Closing the Feedback Gap”, Academy of Management Executive,
27. Paulhus D L and Reid D B (1991), “Enhancement and Denial in Socially Desirable
Responding”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol
28. Peck M S (1983), People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil , Touchstone,
29. Rogers C R (1951), Client-Centered Therapy, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
30. Rosenthal S A and Pittinsky T L (2006), “Narcissistic Leadership”, Leadership
31. Schwartz S H (1992), “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values:
Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries”, Advances in
32. Sedikides C and Strube M J (1997), “Self-Evaluation: To Thine Own Self Be Good,
to Thine Own Self Be Sure, and to Thine Own Self Be True, and to Thine Own
33. Sharp M J and Getz J G (1996), “Substance Use as Impression Management”,
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol
34. Smith D L (2004), Why We Lie: The Evolutionary Roots of Deception and the
Unconscious Mind, St
35. Suls Jerry M and Miller Richard L (1977), Social Comparison Processes:
Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Hemisphere Publishing Company.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document