Preview

Renewable Energy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13893 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Renewable Energy
Energy Economics 40 (2013) S12–S23

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Energy Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco

On the economics of renewable energy sources
Ottmar Edenhofer a,b,c,⁎, Lion Hirth a,d, Brigitte Knopf a, Michael Pahle a, Steffen Schlömer a, Eva Schmid a, Falko Ueckerdt a a Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, P.O. Box 601203, 14412 Potsdam, Germany Economics of Climate Change, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17, Juni 145, 10623 Berlin, Germany Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12-15, 10829 Berlin, Germany d Vattenfall GmbH, Chausseestraße 23, 10961 Berlin, Germany b c

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
With the global expansion of renewable energy (RE) technologies, the provision of optimal RE policy packages becomes an important task. We review pivotal aspects regarding the economics of renewables that are relevant to the design of an optimal RE policy, many of which are to date unresolved. We do so from three interrelated perspectives that a meaningful public policy framework for inquiry must take into account. First, we explore different social objectives justifying the deployment of RE technologies and review model-based estimates of the economic potential of RE technologies, i.e. their socially optimal deployment level. Second, we address pivotal market failures that arise in the course of implementing the economic potential of RE sources in decentralized markets. Third, we discuss multiple policy instruments curing these market failures. Our framework reveals the requirements for an assessment of the relevant options for real-world decision makers in the field of RE policies. This review makes it clear that there are remaining white areas on the knowledge map concerning consistent and socially optimal RE policies. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Available online 21 September 2013 JEL classification: Q21 Q28 Q42



References: Arvizu, D., Bruckner, T., Chum, H., Edenhofer, O., Estefen, S., Faaij, A., Fischedick, M., Hansen, G., Hiriart, G., Hohmeyer, O., Hollands, K.G.T., Huckerby, J., Kadner, S., Killingtveit, Å., Kumar, A., Lewis, A., Lucon, O., Matschoss, P., Maurice, L., Mirza, M., Mitchell, C., Moomaw, W., Moreira, J., Nilsson, L.J., Nyboer, J., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sathaye, J., Sawin, J., Schaeffer, R., Schei, T., Schlömer, S., Seyboth, K., Sims, R., Sinden, G., Sokona, Y., von Stechow, C., Steckel, J., Verbruggen, A., Wiser, R., Yamba, F., Zwickel, T., 2011. Technical summary. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Borenstein, S., 2008. The market value and cost of solar photovoltaic electricity production. CSEM Working Paper 176. Borenstein, S., 2012. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. J. Econ. Perspect. 26 (1), 67–92. Braun, F.G., Schmidt-Ehmcke, J., Zloczysti, P., 2010. Innovative activity in wind and solar technology: empirical evidence on knowledge spillovers using patent data. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 993 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1633875). Chum, H., Faaij, A., Moreira, J., Berndes, G., Dhamija, P., Dong, H., Gabrielle, B., Goss Eng, A., Lucht, W., Mapako, M., Masera Cerutti, O., McIntyre, T., Minowa, T., Pingoud, K., 2011. Bioenergy. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. International, U.S. and E.U. climate change control scenarios: results from EMF 22 [special issue]. In: Clarke, L., Böhringer, C., Rutherford, T.F. (Eds.), Enegy Economics, 31 (Supplement 2), pp. S63–S306. Cramton, P., Ockenfels, A., 2012. Economics and design of capacity markets for the power sector. Z. Energiewirtschaft 36, 113–134. Cramton, P., Stoft, S., 2006. The Convergence of Market Designs for Adequate Generating Capacity. http://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers2005-2009/cramton-stoft-marketdesign-for-resource-adequacy.pdf. Creutzig, F., Popp, A., Plevin, R., Luderer, G., Minx, J., Edenhofer, O., 2012a. Reconciling topdown and bottom-up modeling on future bioenergy deployment. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 320–327. Creutzig, F., von Stechow, C.D.K., Hunsberger, C., Bauer, N., Popp, A., Edenhofer, O., 2012b. Can bioenergy assessments deliver? Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 1 (2), 65–82. DeCesaro, J., Porter, K., 2009. Wind energy and power system operations: a review of wind integration studies to date. NREL Subcontract Report SR-550-47256. Edenhofer, O., Carraro, C., Hourcade, J.-C., Neuhoff, K., Luderer, G., Flachsland, C., Jakob, M., Popp, A., Steckel, J., Strohschein, J., Bauer, N., Brunner, S., Leimbach, M., Lotze-Campen, H., Bosetti, V., Cian, E.d., Tavoni, M., Sassi, O., Waisman, H., Crassous-Doerfler, R., Monjon, S., Dröge, S., Essen, H.v., Río, P.d., Türk, A., 2009. RECIPE — The Economics of Decarbonization. Synthesis Report. Edenhofer, O., Knopf, B., Barker, T., Baumstark, L., Bellevrat, E., Chateau, B., Criqui, P., Isaac, M., Kitous, A., Kypreos, S., Leimbach, M., Lessmann, K., Magné, B., Scrieciu, S., Turton, H., van Vuuren, D.P., 2010. The economics of low stabilization: model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J. 31 (Special Issue 1). Edenhofer, O., Seyboth, K., Creutzig, F., Schloemer, S., 2013. On the sustainability of renewable energy sources. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurevenviron-051012-145344 (in press). European Commission, 2011. COMMUNICATION: Energy Roadmap 2050. http://eur-lex. europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0885:FIN:EN:PDF. Farmer, J.D., Trancik, J.E., 2007. Dynamics of technological development in the energy sector. London Accord Final Publication. In: Onstwedder, J.-P., Mainelli, M. (Eds.), Santa Fe Institute Working Paper #07-12-046. Fischedick, M., Schaeffer, R., Adedoyin, A., Akai, M., Bruckner, T., Clarke, L., Krey, V., Savolainen, I., Teske, S., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Wright, R., 2011. Mitigation potential and costs. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Fischer, C., Newell, R.G., 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 55 (2), 142–162. Flinkerbusch, K., Scheffer, F., 2012. Eine Bewertung verschiedener Kapazitätsmechanismen für den deutschen Strommarkt. Z. Energiewirtschaft 37, 13–25. Fripp, M., Wiser, R.H., 2008. Effects of temporal wind patterns in the value of windgenerated electricity in California and the northwest. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23 (2), 477-485. GE Energy, 2010. Western wind and solar integration study. NREL Subcontract Report SR550-47434. GEA, 2012. Summary for policymakers. In: Johansson, T.B., Nakicenovic, N., Patwardhan, A., Gomez-Echeverri, L. (Eds.), Global Energy Assessment (GEA). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City. Gillingham, K., Sweeney, J., 2010. Market failure and the structure of externalities. In: Moselle, B., Schmalensee, R., Padilla, J. (Eds.), Harnessing Renewable Energy in Electric Power Systems: Theory, Practice, Policy. RFF Press. Greene, R., Yatchew, A., 2012. Support schemes for renewable energy: an economic analysis. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 1 (2). S22 O. Edenhofer et al. / Energy Economics 40 (2013) S12–S23 Mills, A., Wiser, R., 2012. Changes in the Economic Value of Variable Generation at High Penetration Levels: A Pilot Case Study of California. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (http://www.csp-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/ 11/Changes-in-Economic-Value-of-Variable-Gen-at-High-Penetration-Levels.pdf). Moomaw, W., Yamba, F., Kamimoto, M., Maurice, L., Nyboer, J., Urama, K., Weir, T., 2011. Introduction. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Müsgens, F., Peek, M., 2011. Sind Kapazitätsmärkte in Deutschland erforderlich? - Eine kritische Analyse vor dem Hintergrund der Ökonomischen Theorie. Z. N. Energierecht 6/2011, 576–583. Neij, L., 2008. Cost development of future technologies for power generation—a study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments. Energy Policy 36 (6), 2200–2211. Nemet, G.F., 2009. Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies. Energy Policy 37 (3), 825–835. Nicolosi, M., 2012a. The Economics of Renewable Electricity Market Integration. An Empirical and Model-Based Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks and Their Impacts on the Power Market. Universität zu Köln (PhD). Nicolosi, M., 2012b. Notwendigkeit und Ausgestaltungsmöglichkeiten eines Kapazitätsmechanismus für Deutschland. Kurzgutachten erstellt für das Umweltbundesamt.Ecofys GmbH (http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/ecofys_2012_ kapazitaetsmechanismen.pdf). Nordhaus, W.D., 2009a. Designing a friendly space for technological change to slow global warming. Snowmass Conference on Technologies to Combat Global Warming, Snowmass (CO), August 3–4. Nordhaus, W.D., 2009b. The perils of the learning model for modeling endogenous technological change. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 14638 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w14638.pdf). Pahle, M., Knopf, B., Tietjen, O., Schmid, E., 2012. Kosten des Ausbaus der Erneuerbaren Energien: Eine Metaanalyse von Szenarien. (http://www.umweltdaten.de/ publikationen/fpdf-l/4351.pdf). Palmer, K., Burtraw, D., 2005. Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies. Energy Econ. 27 (6), 873–894. Pérez-Arriaga, I.J., 2001. Long-term reliability of generation in competitive wholesale markets: a critical review of issues and alternative options. IIT Working PaperIIT00-098IT (June2001). Pérez-Arriaga, I.J., Meseguer, C., 1997. Wholesale marginal prices in competitive generation markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 12, 710–717. Piscitello, L., Garrone, P., Wang, Y., 2012. Cross-country spillovers in the renewable energy sector. Paper to be presented at the DRUID 2012 on June 19 to June 21 at CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark (http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/8sqn3os3fph4j08s4ic461g60k36. pdf). REN21, 2012. Renewables 2012 Global Status Report (Paris: REN21 Secretariat). http:// www.map.ren21.net/GSR/GSR2012_low.pdf. Rodilla, P., Batlle, C., 2012. Security of electricity supply at the generation level: problem analysis. Energy Policy 40, 177–185. Rodrik, D., 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press. Sathaye, J., Lucon, O., Rahman, A., Christensen, J., Denton, F., Fujino, J., Heath, G., Kadner, S., Mirza, M., Rudnick, H., Schlaepfer, A., Shmakin, A., 2011. Renewable energy in the context of sustainable development. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Schmid, E., Pahle, M., Knopf, B., 2013. A Meta-Analysis of Renewable Electricity Generation in German Mitigaiton Scenarios. Energy Policy 61, 1151–1163. Sensfuß, F., Ragwitz, M., Genoese, M., 2008. The merit-order effect: a detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany. Energy Policy 36 (8), 3086–3094. Sims, R., Mercado, P., Krewitt, W., Bhuyan, G., Flynn, D., Holttinen, H., Jannuzzi, G., Khennas, S., Liu, Y., O 'Malley, M., Nilsson, L.J., Ogden, J., Ogimoto, K., Outhred, H., Ulleberg, Ø., Hulle, F.v., 2011. Integration of renewable energy into present and future energy systems. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Smith, C., Milligan, M., DeMeo, E., Parsons, B., 2007. Utility wind integration and operating impact state of the art. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22 (3), 900–908. Stiglitz, J.E., 1990. Whither Socialism? MIT Press. Stoft, S., 2002. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. IEEE Press.e. Stoughton, M., Chen, R., Lee, S., 1980. Direct construction of the optimal generation mix. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 99 (2), 753–759. Sullivan, P., Krey, V., Riahi, K., 2013. Impacts of considering electric sector variability and reliability in the MESSAGE model. Energy Strategy Rev. 1 (3), 157–163. Tavoni, M., Cian, E., Luderer, G., Steckel, J., Waisman, H., 2012. The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy. Clim. Chang. 114 (1), 39–57. Ueckerdt, F., Hirth, L., Luderer, G., Edenhofer, O., 2013. System LCOE: what are the costs of variable renewables? USAEE Working Paper 2200572 (http://ssrn.com/abstract= 2200572). Ulph, A., Ulph, D., 2009. Optimal climate change policies when governments cannot commit. Discussion Paper 0909. University of St. Andrews. Gross, R., Heptonstall, P., Anderson, D., Green, T., Leach, M., Skea, J., 2006. The Costs and Impacts of Intermittency: An Assessment of the Evidence on the Costs and Impacts of Intermittent Generation on the British Electricity Network. www.uwig.org/mwginternal/de5fs23hu73ds/progress?id=GxdIkw+r0n. Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D., 2003. Economic development as self-discovery. J. Dev. Econ. 72 (2), 603–633. Hirth, L., Ueckerdt, F., Edenhofer, O., 2013. Integration Costs and the Value of Wind Power. Thoughts on a valuation framework for variable renewable electricity sources. Energy Policy (submitted for publication). Hirth, L., 2013. The market value of variable renewables: the effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price. Energy Econ. 38, 218–236 (http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0140988313000285). Hogan, W.W., 2005. On an “ENERGY ONLY” electricity market design for resource adequacy. Working Paper. Center for Business and Government John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. Holttinen, H., Meibom, P., Orths, A., Lange, B., O 'Malley, M., Tande, J.O., Estanqueiro, A., Gomez, E., Söder, L., Strbac, G., Smith, J.C., van Hulle, F., 2011. Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration. Wind Energy 14 (2), 179–192. IPCC, 2011. Summary for policymakers. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Irwin, D.A., Klenow, P.J., 1994. Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry. J. Polit. Econ. 102 (6), 1200–1227. Jaffe, A., Newell, R.G., Stavins, R.N., 2005. A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 54 (2–3), 164–174. Joskow, P.L., 2006. Competitive electricity markets and investment in new generating capacity. Working Papers 0609. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. Joskow, P.L., 2011. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. Am. Econ. Rev. 101 (3), 238–241. Junginger, M., van Sark, W., Faaij, A. (Eds.), 2010. Technological Learning in the Energy Sector. Lessons for Policy, Industry and Science. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Kalkuhl, M., Edenhofer, O., Lessmann, K., 2012. Learning or lock-in: optimal technology policies to support mitigation. Resour. Energy Econ. 34 (1), 1–23. Kalkuhl, M., Lessmann, K., Edenhofer, O., 2013. Renewable energy subsidies: secondbest policy or fatal aberration for mitigation? Resour. Energy Econ. 35 (3), 217–234. Knopf, B., Edenhofer, O., Barker, T., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., Chateau, B., Criqui, P., Held, A., Isaac, M., Jakob, M., Jochem, E., Kitous, A., Kypreos, S., Leimbach, M., Magné, B., Mima, S., Schade, W., Scrieciu, S., Turton, H., van Vuuren, D., 2009. The economics of low stabilisation: implications for technological change and policy. In: Hulme, M., Neufeldt, H. (Eds.), Making Climate Change Work for Us — ADAM Synthesis Book. Cambridge University Press. Knopf, B., Luderer, G., Edenhofer, O., 2011. Exploring the feasibility of low stabilization targets. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 2 (4), 617–626. Knopf, B., Chen, H.-Y., De Cian, E., Förster, H., Kanudia, A., Karkatsouli, I., Keppo, I., Koljonen, T., Schumacher, K., van Vuuren, D.P., 2013. Beyond 2020 — strategies for transforming the European energy system. Clim. Chang. Econ. 4 (4) (EMF28 special issue, in press). Krey, V., Clarke, L., 2011. Role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: a synthesis of recent scenarios. Clim. Policy 11 (4), 1131–1158. Lamont, A., 2008. Assessing the long-term system value of intermittent electric generation technologies. Energy Econ. 30 (3), 1208–1231. Leprich, U., Hauser, E., Grashof, K., 2012. Kompassstudie Marktdesign Leitideen für ein Design eines Stromsystems mit hohem Anteil fluktuierender Erneuerbarer Energien. www.bee-ev.de/_downloads/publikationen/studien/2012/1212_BEEGPE-IZES-Kompassstudie-Marktdesign.pdf. Luderer, G., Bosetti, V., Jakob, M., Leimbach, M., Steckel, J.C., Waisman, H., Edenhofer, O., 2012. The economics of decarbonizing the energy system — results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Clim. Chang. 114 (1), 9–37. Luderer, G., Krey, V., Calvin, K., Merrick, J., Mima, S., Pietzcker, R., Van Vliet, J., Wada, K., 2013. The role of renewable energy in climate stabilization: results from the EMF27 scenarios. Clim. Chang. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0924-z (in press). Mai, T., Wiser, R., Sandor, D., Brinkman, G., Heath, G., Denholm, P., Hostick, D.J., Darghouth, N., Schlosser, A., Strzepek, K., 2012. Exploration of high-penetration renewable electricity futures. Renewable Electricity Futures Study, vol. 1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO (NREL/TP-6A20-52409-1, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/ fy12osti/52409-1.pdf). Mai, T., Logan, J., Blair, N., Sullivan, P., Bazilian, M., 2013. RE-ASSUME A Decision Maker 's Guide to Evaluating Energy Scenarios, Modeling, and Assumptions. http://iea-retd. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/RE-ASSUME_IEA-RETD_2013.pdf. McCollum, D.L., Krey, V., Riahi, K., 2011. An integrated approach to energy sustainability. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1, 428–429 (December 2011). McCollum, D.L., Krey, V., Riahi, K., Kolp, P., Grubler, A., Makowski, M., Nakicenovic, N., 2013. Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges. Clim. Chang. 119 (2), 479–494. Milligan, M., Kirby, B., 2009. Calculating wind integration costs: separating wind energy value from integration cost impacts. NREL Technical Report TP-55046275. Milligan, M., Ela, E., Hodge, B.M., Kirby, B., Lew, D., Clark, C., DeCesaro, J., Lynn, K., 2011. Integration of variable generation, cost-causation, and integration costs. Electr. J. 24 (9), 51–63. O. Edenhofer et al. / Energy Economics 40 (2013) S12–S23 UNEP, 2011. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication — A Synthesis for Policy Makers. www.unep.org/greeneconomy. Verbruggen, A., Moomaw, W., Nyboer, J., 2011. Annex I: glossary, acronyms, chemical symbols and prefixes. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C.v. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate S23 Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Yeh, S., Rubin, E.S., 2012. A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves. Energy Econ. 34 (3), 762–771. You, C.F., Xu, X.C., 2010. Coal combustion and its pollution control in China. Energy 35 (11), 4467–4472.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    World carbon emissions (CO2) have reached the safety limits that scientists have set. Science claims that by the end of the century the long term impacts in the surface of earth will have inevitable irreversible consequences (Hansen, 13). The most discussed debate nowadays, as a solution for CO2 emissions and consequently global warming, is the shift to renewable sources of energy. The term renewable refers to sources of energy, such as solar, wind, geothermal and hydroelectric as some of them, that are related to a natural resource which is replenished. Moreover, renewables are clean, friendly to the environment and they do not produce emissions. However, this energy transmission is not an easy assignment. Vaclav Smil, in his “The Long Slow and Rise of Solar and Wind”, makes a strong claim that this energy transition to renewables is challenging for several reasons and it needs more time than the predicted. The intermittency issues of solar and wind, the increasing scale of power demands and the size and cost of reshaping the infrastructure are some basic reasons (Smil). According to Smil 87 percent of the world’s total energy comes from fossil fuels, which are responsible for the CO2 in the atmosphere, while renewables claiming only 10 percent of total energy (par. 2). This small percent of renewable is also mentioned by Larry Bell in his “Green Power Gridlock”. Bell argues that renewable energy is not an alternative to fossil fuels because of the unreliability of renewable grid system (Bell). However, numerous case studies that discussed in “Can Renewables Provide Baseload Power”, such as Denmark, Norway and Germany, have shown that with a well designed strategy renewable energy can provide base load power 24-hour per day…

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Tahvonen, O., & Salo, S. (2001). Economic growth and transitions between renewable and nonrenewable energy resources. European Economic Review,45(8), 1379 - 1398.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    resersh paper

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the current United States economy renewable resources are too expensive to rival fossil fuels in the energy market. Energy sources like wind and solar power require large government subsides to even compete in markets where the electricity cost is already incredibly high (Gold 1). Alternative energy sources require large amounts of government funding…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    North Mountain Nursery

    • 176409 Words
    • 706 Pages

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2013 (AEO2013) was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), under the direction of John J. Conti (john.conti@eia.gov, 202/586-2222), Assistant Administrator of Energy Analysis; Paul D. Holtberg (paul.holtberg@ eia.gov, 202/586-1284), Team Leader, Analysis Integration Team, Office of Integrated and International Energy Analysis; Joseph A. Beamon (joseph.beamon@eia.gov, 202/586-2025), Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis; Sam A. Napolitano (sam.napolitano@eia.gov, 202/586-0687), Director, Office of Integrated and International Energy Analysis; A. Michael Schaal (michael.schaal@eia.gov, 202/586-5590), Director, Office of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Biofuels Analysis; and James T. Turnure (james.turnure@eia.gov, 202/586-1762), Director, Office of Energy Consumption and Efficiency Analysis. Complimentary copies are available to certain groups, such as public and academic libraries; Federal, State, local, and foreign governments; EIA survey respondents; and the media. For further information and answers to questions, contact: Office of Communications, EI-40 Forrestal Building, Room 1E-210 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585 Telephone: 202/586-8800 (24-hour automated information line) E-mail: infoctr@eia.gov Fax: 202/586-0727 Website: www.eia.gov…

    • 176409 Words
    • 706 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Summary And Evaluation

    • 1254 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mr Epstein made a value claim that 'environmentalist' leaders adopt a policy to eliminate 'dirty' fossil fuel industry, by backing up alternative energy: solar and wind. However, he argued that these sources of energy are unreliable, expensive and not abundant, unlike that of fossil fuels. As such, countries pay negative effects as they use these energy. In this inductive argument, he has used several statistics to substantiate his claims. These data…

    • 1254 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are debating how to best meet energy needs in the United States. Some argue that the country must decrease its dependence on oil and invest in alternative sources of energy. The United States use tons of oil daily witch tends to be very expensive. Many people believe that to best meet energy needs would be to find alternative sources, such as wind, and solar power. The simple fact is, renewable and alternative energy should be a major investment for everyone. Energy conservation can result in increased financial capital, environmental quality, national security, personal security, and comfort. Individuals and organizations choose to conserve energy to reduce energy costs and promote economic security. However, Industrial, and commercial users can increase energy use efficiency. Repeated use of alternative sources would help the United States to gradually clean up pollution and also save millions of dollars in the future.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, economically, wind power is said to be expensive because the initial investment on it is higher compared to fossil fuels. However, wind power is cheaper compared to other renewable energy sources. Statistic has shown that for 1 Megawatt (MW) of power, wind energy only cost $80 compared to solar and wave energy which cost $180 and $100 respectively (Peacock, n.d.). Since future technology guarantees the installation and maintenance price to only continue decreasing, the lifetime investment on wind power is much more lower (Nash, 2008). This proves that this type of power generation is affordable for everyone.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    solar energy paper

    • 1239 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nersesian, R. L. (2007). Energy for the 21st Century: A Comprehensive Guide to Conventional and Alternative Sources. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Research Paper

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lifetime savings after green energy have been phenomenal: $4 for every $1 spent in 2006, $60 million a year in avoided energy costs. Air quality benefits are just as dramatic. Carbon dioxide emissions were reduced by 181,000 tons in 2006, the equivalent of removing 31,200 cars from the road (Anderson). By conforming to green energy and upgrading existing technologies, costs of energy are paid for by excess energy. There are programs that allow for any unused energy already collected, i.e. Solar Panels, wind turbines, water mills, etc., to be sold back to the provider for cost coverage and sometimes profit. Since 2005, the energy consumption per dollar has been reduced by half. Making the change from non-renewable energies needs large up-front investments which will cloud the long-term benefits for most of the public residencies. For this reason, the complete change to renewable resources is becoming near but still has a long way to go until non-renewable resources have departed.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cnooc Case Study

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Due to economic growth and development, global investment in renewable energy increased from $20 billion in 2004 to 120 billion in 2008. Throughout the substantial…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Renewable Energy

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Canada should subsidize renewable energy options such as wind and solar power in order to increase the share of renewables in Canada’s energy balance.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the last 20 years the clean energy industry has endured staggering growth. Public subsidies that have propelled the space to 25 percent annual growth rates in recent years have now become politically unsustainable. Last year, the number of new wind turbine installations dropped for the first time; in the United States, the figure fell by as much as half. The revolution in clean energy was supposed to help fix these problems while also creating green jobs that would power the economic recovery. Some niches in clean energy will still be profitable, such as residential rooftop solar installations and biofuel made from Brazilian sugar cane, which is already competitive with oil. While emphasizing the declining role of renewable energy going forward, the authors focus on vital energy sources, notably hydrocarbon fossil fuels and nuclear energy.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eco314

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Broad overview of major areas of energy economics and related environmental issues. Understanding of important economic tools used to analyse energy markets. Develop capacity to understand public discourse and critically assess energy and environmental debates, (e.g., decarbonization, fracking, renewable energy, markets v. regulation …). Facility with vast data resources on energy and related environmental issues.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wind Energy

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wind energy is a free, renewable resource, so no matter how much is used today, there will still be the same supply in the future. Because the wind energy is also the source of the clean, and non- polluting, electricity. Wind energy is friendly to the surrounding environment, as no fossil fuels were to generate electricity from wind energy.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Politics of Motivation

    • 6851 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Bolsen, Toby, James N. Druckman, and Fay Lomax Cook. 2011. “Opinions About Energy Policy.” Unpublished paper, Northwestern University.…

    • 6851 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Best Essays