Preview

Rene Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
Since the dawn of mankind, the concepts of personal identity and the nature of consciousness have mystified us. We have gazed up to cosmos in search of answers for millennia, constantly eluded by the dazzling complexity of our senses, memories, emotions, passions, and intellect. As a result of our ever-present wonder, philosophers have theorized over the course of many centuries about the nature of the human experience – during the 17th century, the Age of Reason brought about Rene Descartes’ concepts of innate knowledge, mind/body dualism, and theories of consciousness as a byproduct of the mind. These ideas transformed the face of philosophy and solidified Descartes as the venerable “Father of Philosophy” until John Locke’s progressive concepts …show more content…
In his work, Meditations on First Philosophy, he explores the concept of doubt, and within this exploration, discoveries what he believes to be the nature of human consciousness, the soul, and personal identity. Descartes theorized that consciousness itself proves that we are real – he asserts that, should you reflect on and doubt your existence, you must actually exist in the first place in order to do so. This, to Descartes, encapsulates the concept of Cogito ergo sum, or “I think, therefore I am.” However, consciousness is a byproduct created in response to something beyond the mind – it does not exist without external stimuli giving it purpose, according to the French philosopher. Similarly, Descartes goes on to state that the role of consciousness is purely perfunctory, in that it provides certain inarguable truths to the mind, which he defined as “innate ideas.” Among these ideas were the concepts of the existence of self, or “Cogito ergo sum,” the existence of God, and statements such as, “nothing comes out …show more content…
Locke indicates that all of the ideas of the mind are a result of the actions and perceptions of the body in the material world. Due to the heavy emphasis on empiricism in his work, the British philosopher differs from Descartes in that he rejects the concept of innate ideas, claiming that the mind contains no inborn or private truths. The mind, according to Locke, receives the world as a tabula rasa, or blank slate, and garners knowledge and belief systems based on sensory data. In An Essay, he explains the blank slate of the mind as “white paper, void of all characters, without any ideas: — How comes it to be furnished?... To this I answer, in one word, from EXPERIENCE. In that all our knowledge is founded; and from that it ultimately derives itself”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Other than the Cogito stating ‘so long as I continue to think I am something,’ which was determined to be a first principle in the First Meditations, another self-evident truth arises in the beginning of the Third Meditation that is a crucial antecedent for Descartes’ belief system regarding the existence of God. This first principle explicitly states that everything Descartes’ thinking being clearly and distinctly perceives is true. A few other important claims are made in the Third Mediation that are especially relevant to the Fifth Mediations, such as the claim that ideas considered alone in their own right cannot be outwardly false. Accounting for intuitive error, Descartes elaborates that even though ideas might have proceeded from things outside him, it does not follow that these ideas must resemble those outside things. An idea for a substance however, or something that exists in itself, has a greater objective reality than ideas without a substance, because it is more clear and distinct. It is from this foundation that Descartes’ idea of God is defined as, “a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful.”…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Are We?

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this section ‘I think, therefore I am’ Alsford looks into human beings as subjects and refers to the philosophy of Rene Descartes concerning human nature. Descartes theorized that if he thought that something is false and he is the one thinking it, he states: “I think, therefore I am.” Descartes philosophy continues to dominate Western thought and culture even to this day.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another philosophical reference found in the Matrix is the work of René Descartes. He is responsible for Cartesian coordinates, a system that specifies each point uniquely in a plane by a pair of numerical coordinates, and the phrase, “I think, therefore I am.” In his book Meditations on First Philosophy, he poses the question of how we can know that the world we experience daily is not an illusion being forced upon us by an evil demon. Because we believe what we see and feel when we are dreaming, how can we trust that our senses will tell us when we are no longer dreaming. If senses cannot provide us with proof that the world we live in actually exists, then senses are unreliable and that for all we know, the world might be under the control…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that consciousness is always accompanied by thinking. And thinking distinguishes us from other thinking things. And this consists of our personal identity. Locke says that for a man to be the same man overtime it is necessary that man's body persist over that time. And thus our conception of a person involves perception and consciousness.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates once said, “As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it, as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge, while in Empiricism, true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene Descartes, a rationalist, and John Locke, an empiricist, were prime examples of epistemologists who were seen to differentiate greatly within each of their philosophies. However, although Descartes and Locke’s ideas did contrast in that sense, they both shared common concepts that helped mould the basis of their ideas.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    BETWEEN APPEARANCE AND REALITY Bertrand Russell once asked, “Is there any knowledge in the world which is so certain that no reasonable man could doubt it?” (Cahn, 2012) In his own method, he believed this to be false; after all, everyone perceives the world differently than the person next to them. By using a table as an example, he explains that everything should be questioned, even the things that appear to be absolute. In this paper, Russell’s theory is compared to those of René Descartes and David Hume. Descartes convinces himself that everything in life is a falsehood; from the world around him to his very limbs. To combat this, he views everything as deception. He admits to being “lazy” occasionally, slipping into the habit of believing instead of doubting the things around him.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the day I was born, I have constantly been presented with new information. As this new information is processed in my head, I discover new things, create new beliefs within my mind, and reach new levels of understanding. Unfortunately, I 've learned that not all the beliefs I hold are based on fact. I often misunderstand the facts or confuse the ideas that I already possess. When I was young, I often believed certain things to be fact, merely because my elders had told me so, that I now recognize to be false. In my own philosophical thinking, how many of those beliefs remain undiscovered to me to this day, and what impact have they made on my life?…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Rene Descartes’ Meditations on Philosophy, he attempts to prove the existence of God, by lowering things to the most basic truths that can be known. He wishes to prove God’s existence beyond any doubt, so he lays out everything that cannot be proven, in order to get to what can be proven beyond doubt. However, his initial doubts end up disproving the argument he is trying to make. He rightly believes that nearly everything people experience throughout their lives can be doubted, but then tries to use this as evidence for God, which disproves his own point. He ends up saying that God can be proven to be real, but it is impossible to say for sure because of the doubt he has already laid out.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Yweah

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Have you ever felt that you didn’t know what your purpose was in this world? Or if you even exist at some times? Well by even questioning the idea of existence, by definition of Descartes and David Cunning, you do exist. Descartes came up with this notion of “I am. I exist,” which means if you are doubt, ponder, think or judge then you exist (THC 224). Before we get too far into Descartes beliefs we need to understand his two conjectures of the res extensa and the res cogitans, which respectively means extended thing and the thinking thing (THC 223).…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As he attempted to combine the new with old, Rene Descartes became one of these groundbreaking philosophers who attempted to start philosophy from scratch. The premise of Descartes’ works began with the saying, “I think, therefore I exist”. This motto came from Descartes not accepting anything and trying to doubt everything that exists. Descartes came to this realization after many hours of trying to determine what aspects of his existence were undeniable. He worked from outside to inside, quickly placing doubt on many aspects of the world that, at first glance, seem trustworthy. He went past where people had drawn the line before, and soon he was left with only a mind that necessarily exists because it thinks. Nonetheless, now knowing that the mind exists, it is important to point out that Descartes was a Metaphysical Dualist, which means that the world is separated into thinking things and extended things. The thinking things are the mind, and the extended things are all the physical and material objects in the world. Descartes states that the mind does not…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aptly subtitled “Of the Nature of the Human Mind, and That It Is More Easily Known Than the Body”, Descartes tasked himself with using philosophical reasoning in determining truths of the universe and of his own being. Motivated to justify that which he has held to be true, and to use those truths to find answers for questions that he poses both of the truths themselves and of his own existence, Descartes became suspicious of even the most basic elements of himself. Therefore, he needed to explore one innate form that he could be absolutely sure of: his own mind. Descartes closes the First Meditation with a limited starting point, as he has just proven to himself that he must doubt everything that he has and holds to be true, including his…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays