Religious Language Is Meaningless Discuss

Better Essays
The debate here is do ethics and religion deal with fact or opinions. There are two types of ethical statement descriptive and normative. Descriptive ethical statements such as “most crime is carried out by young men” are verifiable which means that they can be proved as fact or fiction.
The key areas pf philosophical debate during the 20th century concern meta-ethics and meta-physics, where the meaning of what is said takes central stage. For instance what is the nature of language and how can statements be shown to be true or false?
If we want to fully understand morality we must analyse the meaning of the key moral terms used, what it means, what it does and how it may be verified. Take the word ‘good’; we may describe it in an absolute way, “this is a good essay” or in a relative way, “compared to the previous one, this essay is good”. Or in a utilitarian way, “this essay will get a good result” However none of these uses or descriptions actually tell us what the word good means.
G. E. Moore stated that ‘good’ could not be defined in his book, Principia Ethica. You just know what is good by intuition; you can speak about something being good without knowing how to define it. A weakness of the view that ethical terms have a meaning that we can intuit, but not define, is how can we be sure that our intuitions are correct? Also, why, if my moral obligations are self-evident, do I have dilemmas over conflicting duties? The issue of verification is also raised; intuition may be considered to be a meaningless concept itself, since it is non-verifiable.
The meaning of language and the principle of verification was at the forefront of debate in the 20th Century movement known as Logical Positivism. Philosophers such as A.J. Ayer, writing in Language, Truth and Logic and members of the Vienna Circle, wanted to be able to break down language into its simplest components. All meaningful propositions were divided into two categories, analytic and synthetic. Analytical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “Religious language is meaningless” The problem of religious language considers whether it is possible to talk about God meaningfully if the traditional conceptions of God as being incorporeal, infinite, and timeless, are accepted. Because these traditional conceptions of God make it difficult to describe him, religious language has the potential to be meaningless. Theories of religious language either attempt to demonstrate that such language is meaningless, or attempt to show how religious language…

    • 7517 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Ethical language is meaningless” Discuss Ethics is concerned with what is right and what is wrong. Meta-ethics however looks at the language, it asks “What does it mean to say that something is right or wrong”. In the words of Pojman, "normative ethics is a philosophical examination of morality, meta-ethics is philosophising about ethics -that is, about the very terms and structure of ethical theories." I aim to explore the claim that all ethical language is meaningless by looking at some of…

    • 1272 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss. Twentieth Century ethics has been highly dominated by linguistics. Ethicists now worked to discover the meanings of terms such as “good” or “bad”. This goes beyond normative ethics such as Utilitarianism, Kantian ethics or Virtue ethics but rather looks at the usefulness and meaningfulness of ethical language, known as Meta ethics. It also tries to understand the meaning of terms used in descriptive ethics usually used by sociologists. Ethical language…

    • 706 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critically assess the view that religious language is meaningless (35) The view that religious language is meaningless is one that is shared by many as the religious statements claims can’t validated by evidence and equally can’t be falsified. In addition some hold the view that we can’t talk meaningfully about a being greater than ourselves as our language is limited in describing a being as great as God. However, there are those that believe we can meaningfully make religious statements so long as they…

    • 1812 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Critically assess the claim that religious language is meaningless” Religious language has been argued about by many philosophers to whether or not the ways in which we speak about religion are relevant or meaningful. This issue of religious language looks at the way we talk about God, debate ideas and communicate our theist or atheist ideologies. For some, religious language is meaningful and full of purpose while others see it to being incomprehensible and pointless. The Vienna Circle was…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Religious language

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The problem of religious language Religious language is the communication ideas about God, faith, belief and practise. The problem with the communication of these ideas is that behind the words used are concepts. Individuals have different understandings of the concepts and this might result in differences of interpretation and meaning. Some philosophers argue that religious language is used in different ways from everyday language. Cognitive: when applied to religious language, this communicates…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the value of myth and symbol in Religious language Myth and symbol are part of the complex structure and character of religious language and are used when factual statements are deemed as inappropriate in conveying a certain message. Religious language is usually non-cognitive, this is as it can be used in order to evoke emotion in someone, for example like the poppy which is used for the remembrance of the soldiers who lost their lives fighting for their country. As symbols are non-cognitive…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the debate about religious language, it is important that broadly speaking, there are two types of language, cognitive and non-cognitive. Cognitive language conveys facts i.e. things that we can know or be cognisant of. Non-cognitive language conveys information that is not factual; feelings and emotional claims. Those who believe that religious language is non-cognitive and so meaningless stem their beliefs from the Logical Positivist. The Logical Positivists were a group of philosophers who…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy Is Meaningless

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All Men are Liars: Is Democracy Meaningless? 1 by Gerry Mackie St. John's College University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3JP United Kingdom gerry.mackie@sjc.ox.ac.uk April 18, 1997 Forthcoming in Jon Elster, ed., Deliberative Democracy 2 I. Introdu ction. One current of thought within the rational choice approach to the study of politics asserts that democratic voting and democratic discussion are each, generally, inaccurate and meaningless. 2 I will call an emphasis on these descriptive…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A. J. Ayer considered all religious language to be meaningless. He came to this conclusion through his Verification principle, which argued that a statement which cannot be verified is meaningless. In Ayer’s own words, “A statement is held to be literally meaningful if and only if it is either analytic or empirically verifiable”. He says that a religious utterance may be emotionally significant to the person saying it, but it is not literally significant. An example of this would be the statement…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays