Religious language

Satisfactory Essays
The problem of religious language
Religious language is the communication ideas about God, faith, belief and practise. The problem with the communication of these ideas is that behind the words used are concepts. Individuals have different understandings of the concepts and this might result in differences of interpretation and meaning. Some philosophers argue that religious language is used in different ways from everyday language.
Cognitive: when applied to religious language, this communicates knowledge, information and facts about God (something about God may be known about God). The problem with this is that religious statements are not about objective facts that can be proved true or false. The argument put forward is that we are unable to validate religious statements based on objective facts that are open to cognition then religious language is considered to be meaningless.
Anthropomorphises: attributes human forms or personality to a god, animal or object. There is the problem of how God is to be described when nothing is known about God. For example, is it right to refer to a supreme being using human terminology such as ‘he’ and ‘him’. It is felt that the use of language in this way anthropomorphises or objectifies God. Using words in this way appears to limit God’s majesty or power in some way.
This has led to religious believers seeking ways in which they can talk about God in a meaningful way and some non-believers seeking to demonstrate why religious language is meaningless. One group that considered religious language as meaningless was the logical positivists.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “Religious language is meaningless” The problem of religious language considers whether it is possible to talk about God meaningfully if the traditional conceptions of God as being incorporeal, infinite, and timeless, are accepted. Because these traditional conceptions of God make it difficult to describe him, religious language has the potential to be meaningless. Theories of religious language either attempt to demonstrate that such language is meaningless, or attempt to show how religious language…

    • 7517 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    which means that they can be proved as fact or fiction. The key areas pf philosophical debate during the 20th century concern meta-ethics and meta-physics, where the meaning of what is said takes central stage. For instance what is the nature of language and how can statements be shown to be true or false? If we want to fully understand morality we must analyse the meaning of the key moral terms used, what it means, what it does and how it may be verified. Take the word ‘good’; we may describe it…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A) Explain the problems of religious language. (30) Some words used within religious language may be viewed as contradictory to our inherent beliefs and logical view as human beings one example of this would be the story of the ‘virgin Mary’ as there is no logical explanation to how she gave birth. Many of the words used in religious language are also metaphysical and have no physical representation therefore it is very hard for us as humans to fully comprehend the ideas they are expressing. An…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A. J. Ayer considered all religious language to be meaningless. He came to this conclusion through his Verification principle, which argued that a statement which cannot be verified is meaningless. In Ayer’s own words, “A statement is held to be literally meaningful if and only if it is either analytic or empirically verifiable”. He says that a religious utterance may be emotionally significant to the person saying it, but it is not literally significant. An example of this would be the statement…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critically assess the view that religious language is meaningless (35) The view that religious language is meaningless is one that is shared by many as the religious statements claims can’t validated by evidence and equally can’t be falsified. In addition some hold the view that we can’t talk meaningfully about a being greater than ourselves as our language is limited in describing a being as great as God. However, there are those that believe we can meaningfully make religious statements so long as they…

    • 1812 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent is religious language meaningful? There are two ways to approach whether religious language is meaningful. Some philosophers such as logical positivist have a cognitive approach based on facts and learning through experience. Anthony flew is one philosopher whom shares the belief that something can be seen as meaningful through assertion, statements that can be proved empirically through synthetic reasoning. The other approach to the statement is a non-cognitivist method, which…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious Language and Concepts in Romeo and Juliet The epistle of Saint John unequivocally states, “Love comes from God” (1 John 4:7). This statement not only explains the source of love but it also provides a means to understand both love and God. If love is from God, then an understanding of love can be derived from knowing God. Thus, the converse, knowing love provides a level of knowledge concerning God, is true. In light of this conclusion, it only seems natural that the two should intersect…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the value of myth and symbol in Religious language Myth and symbol are part of the complex structure and character of religious language and are used when factual statements are deemed as inappropriate in conveying a certain message. Religious language is usually non-cognitive, this is as it can be used in order to evoke emotion in someone, for example like the poppy which is used for the remembrance of the soldiers who lost their lives fighting for their country. As symbols are non-cognitive…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Critically assess the claim that religious language is meaningless” Religious language has been argued about by many philosophers to whether or not the ways in which we speak about religion are relevant or meaningful. This issue of religious language looks at the way we talk about God, debate ideas and communicate our theist or atheist ideologies. For some, religious language is meaningful and full of purpose while others see it to being incomprehensible and pointless. The Vienna Circle was…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    of debates about religious language. Antony Flew believed that religious claims are cognitive in that they are intended to be factual assertions. Flew insisted that claims by the believer such as ‘God loves us’ are not to be taken as ‘anything but assertions’. Verification means to prove the truth of a statement whilst falsification means to prove a statement is false. Logical positivism was developed by the Vienna circle. They only accepted two forms of verifiable language: Analytical a priori…

    • 1026 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays